Rossella Nicoletti, Alex Qinyang Liu, Susan Evans-Axelsson, Asieh Golozar, Katharina Beyer, Bertrand De Meulder, Riccardo Campi, Mauro Gacci, Jeremy Yuen-Chun Teoh, Carl Steinbesser, Ayman Hijazy, Artem Harbachou, James T Brash, Peter-Paul M Willemse, Teemu Murtola, Monique J Roobol, Jesus Moreno Sierra, Anders Bjartell, Axel S Merseburger, Pawel Rajwa, Philip Cornford, Thomas Abbott, James Ndow, Juan Gomez Rivas, Eleanor Davies, Qi Feng, Robert Snijder
{"title":"转移性激素敏感前列腺癌的治疗轨迹:先锋+大数据分析。","authors":"Rossella Nicoletti, Alex Qinyang Liu, Susan Evans-Axelsson, Asieh Golozar, Katharina Beyer, Bertrand De Meulder, Riccardo Campi, Mauro Gacci, Jeremy Yuen-Chun Teoh, Carl Steinbesser, Ayman Hijazy, Artem Harbachou, James T Brash, Peter-Paul M Willemse, Teemu Murtola, Monique J Roobol, Jesus Moreno Sierra, Anders Bjartell, Axel S Merseburger, Pawel Rajwa, Philip Cornford, Thomas Abbott, James Ndow, Juan Gomez Rivas, Eleanor Davies, Qi Feng, Robert Snijder","doi":"10.1016/j.euo.2025.08.007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objective: </strong>The treatment landscape for metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer (mHSPC) is evolving rapidly. Real-world data (RWD) are essential to understand actual treatment use and outcomes. This study aimed to describe treatment trajectories and clinical outcomes in a large, multicenter RWD cohort under the PIONEER project.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Eight European and US databases (2016-2020), including electronic health records, insurance claims, primary care data, and cancer registries, were standardized to the Observational Medical Outcome Partnership Common Data Model. Patients diagnosed with mHSPC and those receiving treatment were identified. The compared and analyzed outcomes included treatment switch, symptomatic progression, adverse events, and death.</p><p><strong>Key findings and limitations: </strong>In total, 107 438 patients with mHSPC were identified, and 67 909 received treatment. Most of the patients received androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) monotherapy (69.4%), followed by ADT + an androgen receptor pathway inhibitor (ARPI; 15.2%), ADT + chemotherapy (14.0%), and triplet therapy (1.2%). The use of ARPIs increased over time. ADT + ARPI showed the highest persistence (53.8%) and a 5-yr switch-free survival rate of up to 72.3%. ADT monotherapy had 5-yr switch-free survival rates of 21.3-58.6% and adverse event-free survival rates of 64.7-81.2%. Addition of an ARPI improved switch-free survival (24.1-72.3%) but lowered adverse event-free survival (55.2-82.7%). Chemotherapy-based and triplet therapies showed variable results without consistent survival benefit. Limitations include residual confounding, inconsistent adverse event reporting, and possible data overlap.</p><p><strong>Conclusions and clinical implications: </strong>This is the largest RWD study of systemic mHSPC treatment. Despite evidence, ADT monotherapy remains the most used first-line therapy. Increased use ADT + ARPI is associated with better persistence and improved outcomes in the real-world setting, supporting its broader adoption in clinical practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":12256,"journal":{"name":"European urology oncology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":9.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Treatment Trajectories in Metastatic Hormone-sensitive Prostate Cancer: A PIONEER+ Big Data Analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Rossella Nicoletti, Alex Qinyang Liu, Susan Evans-Axelsson, Asieh Golozar, Katharina Beyer, Bertrand De Meulder, Riccardo Campi, Mauro Gacci, Jeremy Yuen-Chun Teoh, Carl Steinbesser, Ayman Hijazy, Artem Harbachou, James T Brash, Peter-Paul M Willemse, Teemu Murtola, Monique J Roobol, Jesus Moreno Sierra, Anders Bjartell, Axel S Merseburger, Pawel Rajwa, Philip Cornford, Thomas Abbott, James Ndow, Juan Gomez Rivas, Eleanor Davies, Qi Feng, Robert Snijder\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.euo.2025.08.007\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background and objective: </strong>The treatment landscape for metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer (mHSPC) is evolving rapidly. Real-world data (RWD) are essential to understand actual treatment use and outcomes. This study aimed to describe treatment trajectories and clinical outcomes in a large, multicenter RWD cohort under the PIONEER project.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Eight European and US databases (2016-2020), including electronic health records, insurance claims, primary care data, and cancer registries, were standardized to the Observational Medical Outcome Partnership Common Data Model. Patients diagnosed with mHSPC and those receiving treatment were identified. The compared and analyzed outcomes included treatment switch, symptomatic progression, adverse events, and death.</p><p><strong>Key findings and limitations: </strong>In total, 107 438 patients with mHSPC were identified, and 67 909 received treatment. Most of the patients received androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) monotherapy (69.4%), followed by ADT + an androgen receptor pathway inhibitor (ARPI; 15.2%), ADT + chemotherapy (14.0%), and triplet therapy (1.2%). The use of ARPIs increased over time. ADT + ARPI showed the highest persistence (53.8%) and a 5-yr switch-free survival rate of up to 72.3%. ADT monotherapy had 5-yr switch-free survival rates of 21.3-58.6% and adverse event-free survival rates of 64.7-81.2%. Addition of an ARPI improved switch-free survival (24.1-72.3%) but lowered adverse event-free survival (55.2-82.7%). Chemotherapy-based and triplet therapies showed variable results without consistent survival benefit. Limitations include residual confounding, inconsistent adverse event reporting, and possible data overlap.</p><p><strong>Conclusions and clinical implications: </strong>This is the largest RWD study of systemic mHSPC treatment. Despite evidence, ADT monotherapy remains the most used first-line therapy. Increased use ADT + ARPI is associated with better persistence and improved outcomes in the real-world setting, supporting its broader adoption in clinical practice.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12256,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European urology oncology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":9.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European urology oncology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euo.2025.08.007\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European urology oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euo.2025.08.007","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Treatment Trajectories in Metastatic Hormone-sensitive Prostate Cancer: A PIONEER+ Big Data Analysis.
Background and objective: The treatment landscape for metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer (mHSPC) is evolving rapidly. Real-world data (RWD) are essential to understand actual treatment use and outcomes. This study aimed to describe treatment trajectories and clinical outcomes in a large, multicenter RWD cohort under the PIONEER project.
Methods: Eight European and US databases (2016-2020), including electronic health records, insurance claims, primary care data, and cancer registries, were standardized to the Observational Medical Outcome Partnership Common Data Model. Patients diagnosed with mHSPC and those receiving treatment were identified. The compared and analyzed outcomes included treatment switch, symptomatic progression, adverse events, and death.
Key findings and limitations: In total, 107 438 patients with mHSPC were identified, and 67 909 received treatment. Most of the patients received androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) monotherapy (69.4%), followed by ADT + an androgen receptor pathway inhibitor (ARPI; 15.2%), ADT + chemotherapy (14.0%), and triplet therapy (1.2%). The use of ARPIs increased over time. ADT + ARPI showed the highest persistence (53.8%) and a 5-yr switch-free survival rate of up to 72.3%. ADT monotherapy had 5-yr switch-free survival rates of 21.3-58.6% and adverse event-free survival rates of 64.7-81.2%. Addition of an ARPI improved switch-free survival (24.1-72.3%) but lowered adverse event-free survival (55.2-82.7%). Chemotherapy-based and triplet therapies showed variable results without consistent survival benefit. Limitations include residual confounding, inconsistent adverse event reporting, and possible data overlap.
Conclusions and clinical implications: This is the largest RWD study of systemic mHSPC treatment. Despite evidence, ADT monotherapy remains the most used first-line therapy. Increased use ADT + ARPI is associated with better persistence and improved outcomes in the real-world setting, supporting its broader adoption in clinical practice.
期刊介绍:
Journal Name: European Urology Oncology
Affiliation: Official Journal of the European Association of Urology
Focus:
First official publication of the EAU fully devoted to the study of genitourinary malignancies
Aims to deliver high-quality research
Content:
Includes original articles, opinion piece editorials, and invited reviews
Covers clinical, basic, and translational research
Publication Frequency: Six times a year in electronic format