Daria M Odermatt, Frank Chidawanyika, Daniel M Mutyambai, Bernhard Schmid, Luiz A Domeignoz Horta, Collins O Onjura, Amanuel Tamiru, Meredith C Schuman
{"title":"推拉式种植系统中的挥发物及对秋粘虫的防护。","authors":"Daria M Odermatt, Frank Chidawanyika, Daniel M Mutyambai, Bernhard Schmid, Luiz A Domeignoz Horta, Collins O Onjura, Amanuel Tamiru, Meredith C Schuman","doi":"10.7554/eLife.100981","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Push-pull systems for sustainable pest management combine repellent stimuli from intercrops ('push') and attractive stimuli from border plants ('pull') to repel herbivorous insects from a main crop and attract the herbivores' natural enemies. The most widespread implementation, intercropping the legume <i>Desmodium</i> with maize surrounded by border grass, reduces damage from the invasive fall armyworm (FAW) <i>Spodoptera frugiperda</i>. While initial research indicated that <i>Desmodium</i> volatiles can dampen the attraction of FAW to maize, a recent study recovered very low volatile emission from the commonly used <i>D. intortum</i> and found that the <i>D. intortum</i> headspace did not reduce FAW oviposition on maize (Erdei et al., 2024). Here, we detect volatiles from the headspace of two <i>Desmodium</i> species sampled within the activity window of FAW: <i>D. intortum</i> and the more recently adopted <i>D. incanum</i>; and we present the behavior of gravid FAW moths in bioassays. We detected 25 volatiles from field-grown <i>Desmodium</i>, many in the headspaces of both species, including volatiles previously reported to repel lepidopteran herbivores. In cage oviposition assays, FAW moths preferred to oviposit on maize over <i>Desmodium</i>, but not on maize further from, versus closer to <i>Desmodium</i> plants that were inaccessible to the moths, but sharing headspace. In flight tunnel assays, moths approached the headspace of maize more than shared headspaces of maize and <i>Desmodium</i>, but pairwise differences were often insignificant. Thus, headspaces of <i>Desmodium</i> species include volatiles that could repel FAW moths, and gravid moths were generally more attracted to maize and its headspace than to either <i>Desmodium</i> species or mixed maize-<i>Desmodium</i> headspaces. However, our results suggest that direct effects of <i>Desmodium</i> volatiles on FAW behavior are insufficient to explain reduced FAW infestation of maize under push-pull cultivation.</p>","PeriodicalId":11640,"journal":{"name":"eLife","volume":"13 ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12510683/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"<i>Desmodium</i> volatiles in 'push-pull' cropping systems and protection against the fall armyworm, <i>Spodoptera frugiperda</i>.\",\"authors\":\"Daria M Odermatt, Frank Chidawanyika, Daniel M Mutyambai, Bernhard Schmid, Luiz A Domeignoz Horta, Collins O Onjura, Amanuel Tamiru, Meredith C Schuman\",\"doi\":\"10.7554/eLife.100981\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Push-pull systems for sustainable pest management combine repellent stimuli from intercrops ('push') and attractive stimuli from border plants ('pull') to repel herbivorous insects from a main crop and attract the herbivores' natural enemies. The most widespread implementation, intercropping the legume <i>Desmodium</i> with maize surrounded by border grass, reduces damage from the invasive fall armyworm (FAW) <i>Spodoptera frugiperda</i>. While initial research indicated that <i>Desmodium</i> volatiles can dampen the attraction of FAW to maize, a recent study recovered very low volatile emission from the commonly used <i>D. intortum</i> and found that the <i>D. intortum</i> headspace did not reduce FAW oviposition on maize (Erdei et al., 2024). Here, we detect volatiles from the headspace of two <i>Desmodium</i> species sampled within the activity window of FAW: <i>D. intortum</i> and the more recently adopted <i>D. incanum</i>; and we present the behavior of gravid FAW moths in bioassays. We detected 25 volatiles from field-grown <i>Desmodium</i>, many in the headspaces of both species, including volatiles previously reported to repel lepidopteran herbivores. In cage oviposition assays, FAW moths preferred to oviposit on maize over <i>Desmodium</i>, but not on maize further from, versus closer to <i>Desmodium</i> plants that were inaccessible to the moths, but sharing headspace. In flight tunnel assays, moths approached the headspace of maize more than shared headspaces of maize and <i>Desmodium</i>, but pairwise differences were often insignificant. Thus, headspaces of <i>Desmodium</i> species include volatiles that could repel FAW moths, and gravid moths were generally more attracted to maize and its headspace than to either <i>Desmodium</i> species or mixed maize-<i>Desmodium</i> headspaces. However, our results suggest that direct effects of <i>Desmodium</i> volatiles on FAW behavior are insufficient to explain reduced FAW infestation of maize under push-pull cultivation.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11640,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"eLife\",\"volume\":\"13 \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12510683/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"eLife\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"99\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.100981\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"生物学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"BIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"eLife","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.100981","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
可持续虫害管理的推拉系统结合了间作的驱避刺激(“推”)和边缘植物的吸引刺激(“拉”),以击退主要作物上的食草昆虫,并吸引食草动物的天敌。最普遍的做法是将豆科菊与玉米间作,周围种有草,以减少入侵的秋粘虫(FAW)的危害。虽然最初的研究表明,飞天菊挥发物可以抑制飞天菊对玉米的吸引力,但最近的一项研究发现,常用的飞天菊挥发物的排放量非常低,并发现飞天菊的顶空并没有减少飞天菊在玉米上的产卵(Erdei et al., 2024)。在这里,我们检测了在FAW的活动窗口内采样的两种菊属植物的顶空挥发物:D. intortum和最近采用的D. incanum;并介绍了妊娠FAW蛾在生物检测中的行为。我们从田间种植的飞蛾中检测到25种挥发物,其中许多挥发物存在于两种物种的头顶空间,包括先前报道的击退鳞翅目食草动物的挥发物。在笼内产卵试验中,FAW蛾倾向于在玉米上产卵,而不是在离玉米较远的玉米上产卵,而不是在离玉米较近的玉米上产卵,这些玉米是FAW蛾无法接近的,但共用顶空。在飞行隧道试验中,飞蛾更接近玉米顶空,而不是共用玉米顶空,但两两差异通常不显著。综上所示,Desmodium的顶空含有可排斥FAW飞蛾的挥发物,而孕蛾一般更容易被玉米及其顶空所吸引,而不是被Desmodium或玉米-Desmodium混合顶空所吸引。然而,我们的研究结果表明,飞蛾挥发物对FAW行为的直接影响不足以解释推拉栽培下玉米FAW侵染减少的原因。
Desmodium volatiles in 'push-pull' cropping systems and protection against the fall armyworm, Spodoptera frugiperda.
Push-pull systems for sustainable pest management combine repellent stimuli from intercrops ('push') and attractive stimuli from border plants ('pull') to repel herbivorous insects from a main crop and attract the herbivores' natural enemies. The most widespread implementation, intercropping the legume Desmodium with maize surrounded by border grass, reduces damage from the invasive fall armyworm (FAW) Spodoptera frugiperda. While initial research indicated that Desmodium volatiles can dampen the attraction of FAW to maize, a recent study recovered very low volatile emission from the commonly used D. intortum and found that the D. intortum headspace did not reduce FAW oviposition on maize (Erdei et al., 2024). Here, we detect volatiles from the headspace of two Desmodium species sampled within the activity window of FAW: D. intortum and the more recently adopted D. incanum; and we present the behavior of gravid FAW moths in bioassays. We detected 25 volatiles from field-grown Desmodium, many in the headspaces of both species, including volatiles previously reported to repel lepidopteran herbivores. In cage oviposition assays, FAW moths preferred to oviposit on maize over Desmodium, but not on maize further from, versus closer to Desmodium plants that were inaccessible to the moths, but sharing headspace. In flight tunnel assays, moths approached the headspace of maize more than shared headspaces of maize and Desmodium, but pairwise differences were often insignificant. Thus, headspaces of Desmodium species include volatiles that could repel FAW moths, and gravid moths were generally more attracted to maize and its headspace than to either Desmodium species or mixed maize-Desmodium headspaces. However, our results suggest that direct effects of Desmodium volatiles on FAW behavior are insufficient to explain reduced FAW infestation of maize under push-pull cultivation.
期刊介绍:
eLife is a distinguished, not-for-profit, peer-reviewed open access scientific journal that specializes in the fields of biomedical and life sciences. eLife is known for its selective publication process, which includes a variety of article types such as:
Research Articles: Detailed reports of original research findings.
Short Reports: Concise presentations of significant findings that do not warrant a full-length research article.
Tools and Resources: Descriptions of new tools, technologies, or resources that facilitate scientific research.
Research Advances: Brief reports on significant scientific advancements that have immediate implications for the field.
Scientific Correspondence: Short communications that comment on or provide additional information related to published articles.
Review Articles: Comprehensive overviews of a specific topic or field within the life sciences.