利用分子失配指导诱导治疗。

IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q3 TRANSPLANTATION
Jenny N Tran, James H Lan
{"title":"利用分子失配指导诱导治疗。","authors":"Jenny N Tran, James H Lan","doi":"10.1097/MOT.0000000000001254","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose of review: </strong>Current immune risk criteria for selecting induction therapy lack precision. Here, we examined the relationship of human leukocyte antigen (HLA) and molecular matching with outcomes in patients treated with different induction regimens and immunosuppressive minimization protocols to inform their potential utility in guiding therapy.</p><p><strong>Recent findings: </strong>Initial studies evaluating induction therapy suggest the role of HLA matching in immune risk-stratification. However, criteria based on antigen level matching and panel-reactive antibodies are imprecise and risk over-assigning patients to treatment with T-cell-depleting agents. Molecularly defined low-risk patients comprise 19-61% of study cohorts. Across heterogenous induction regimens and immunosuppressive minimization studies, these patients consistently demonstrated low immune event rates, providing the basis for prospective trials to test its utility in guiding the choice of induction regimens.</p><p><strong>Summary: </strong>Granular assessment of immune compatibility using molecular mismatch methods coupled with rapid genotyping technologies may help improve the selection of immunosuppressive regimens but will require prospective confirmation.</p>","PeriodicalId":10900,"journal":{"name":"Current Opinion in Organ Transplantation","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Use of molecular mismatch to guide induction therapy.\",\"authors\":\"Jenny N Tran, James H Lan\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/MOT.0000000000001254\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose of review: </strong>Current immune risk criteria for selecting induction therapy lack precision. Here, we examined the relationship of human leukocyte antigen (HLA) and molecular matching with outcomes in patients treated with different induction regimens and immunosuppressive minimization protocols to inform their potential utility in guiding therapy.</p><p><strong>Recent findings: </strong>Initial studies evaluating induction therapy suggest the role of HLA matching in immune risk-stratification. However, criteria based on antigen level matching and panel-reactive antibodies are imprecise and risk over-assigning patients to treatment with T-cell-depleting agents. Molecularly defined low-risk patients comprise 19-61% of study cohorts. Across heterogenous induction regimens and immunosuppressive minimization studies, these patients consistently demonstrated low immune event rates, providing the basis for prospective trials to test its utility in guiding the choice of induction regimens.</p><p><strong>Summary: </strong>Granular assessment of immune compatibility using molecular mismatch methods coupled with rapid genotyping technologies may help improve the selection of immunosuppressive regimens but will require prospective confirmation.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10900,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Current Opinion in Organ Transplantation\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Current Opinion in Organ Transplantation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/MOT.0000000000001254\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"TRANSPLANTATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Opinion in Organ Transplantation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/MOT.0000000000001254","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"TRANSPLANTATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

综述目的:目前选择诱导治疗的免疫风险标准缺乏精确性。在这里,我们研究了人类白细胞抗原(HLA)和分子匹配与不同诱导方案和免疫抑制最小化方案治疗的患者结果的关系,以告知它们在指导治疗中的潜在效用。最近发现:评估诱导疗法的初步研究表明HLA匹配在免疫风险分层中的作用。然而,基于抗原水平匹配和整体反应性抗体的标准是不精确的,并且有过度分配患者使用t细胞消耗药物治疗的风险。分子定义的低风险患者占研究队列的19-61%。在异质诱导方案和免疫抑制最小化研究中,这些患者一致表现出低免疫事件发生率,为前瞻性试验提供了基础,以测试其在指导诱导方案选择方面的效用。摘要:使用分子错配方法结合快速基因分型技术对免疫相容性进行颗粒评估可能有助于改善免疫抑制方案的选择,但需要前瞻性确认。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Use of molecular mismatch to guide induction therapy.

Purpose of review: Current immune risk criteria for selecting induction therapy lack precision. Here, we examined the relationship of human leukocyte antigen (HLA) and molecular matching with outcomes in patients treated with different induction regimens and immunosuppressive minimization protocols to inform their potential utility in guiding therapy.

Recent findings: Initial studies evaluating induction therapy suggest the role of HLA matching in immune risk-stratification. However, criteria based on antigen level matching and panel-reactive antibodies are imprecise and risk over-assigning patients to treatment with T-cell-depleting agents. Molecularly defined low-risk patients comprise 19-61% of study cohorts. Across heterogenous induction regimens and immunosuppressive minimization studies, these patients consistently demonstrated low immune event rates, providing the basis for prospective trials to test its utility in guiding the choice of induction regimens.

Summary: Granular assessment of immune compatibility using molecular mismatch methods coupled with rapid genotyping technologies may help improve the selection of immunosuppressive regimens but will require prospective confirmation.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
4.50%
发文量
124
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: ​​​​​​Current Opinion in Organ Transplantation is an indispensable resource featuring key, up-to-date and important advances in the field from around the world. Led by renowned guest editors for each section, every bimonthly issue of Current Opinion in Organ Transplantation delivers a fresh insight into topics such as stem cell transplantation, immunosuppression, tolerance induction and organ preservation and procurement. With 18 sections in total, the journal provides a convenient and thorough review of the field and will be of interest to researchers, surgeons and other healthcare professionals alike.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信