Carlos Agustin Villegas-Valverde, Imilla Casado Hernandez, Yaima Zuñiga Rosales, Fatma Abdou, Shadi Sharif Shamat, Antonio Alfonso Bencomo-Hernandez, Yendry Ventura-Carmenate
{"title":"用于TBNK子集定量的优化DuraClone表型试剂盒工作流程的验证。","authors":"Carlos Agustin Villegas-Valverde, Imilla Casado Hernandez, Yaima Zuñiga Rosales, Fatma Abdou, Shadi Sharif Shamat, Antonio Alfonso Bencomo-Hernandez, Yendry Ventura-Carmenate","doi":"10.1002/cyto.a.24967","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Quantification of T-cells, B-cells, and NK-cells assay is crucial for diagnosing and monitoring immune diseases and evaluating lymphodepleting therapies. To standardize and validate an optimized workflow of the Beckman Coulter DuraClone IM Phenotyping Basic Kit for quantification of TBNK subsets in peripheral blood. Procedural changes included the use of an alternative lysis buffer, the addition of counting beads, the elimination of centrifugation steps, and an increase in acquisition volume. Validation followed CLSI H42-A2 and H62 guidelines, assessing accuracy, precision, linearity, and limit of quantification (LLOQ). Accuracy was evaluated by comparison with Immuno-Trol controls and by Bland-Altman analysis against standard immunophenotyping methods. External proficiency was assessed through participation in the College of American Pathologists (CAP) TBNK program in 2024. Procedural steps were reduced by 50%, and processing time by 38.6%. The modified method demonstrated high accuracy (-3 < bias < 35; cells/μL), a low bias based on Immuno-Trol targets, and strong agreement in the Bland-Altman analysis. The method successfully passed three CAP external proficiency tests in 2024, confirming interlaboratory reliability. Coefficients of variation for precision were below 10% for all subsets. Linearity exceeded R<sup>2</sup> > 0.99 across clinically relevant ranges. Most subsets demonstrated an LLOQ below 10-50 cells/μL, which is suitable for clinical applications. The proposed modifications to the DuraClone IM kit protocol improved workflow efficiency and analytical performance without compromising accuracy or reproducibility. The validated method provides a standardized, reliable, and time-efficient alternative for lymphocyte subset quantification.</p>","PeriodicalId":11068,"journal":{"name":"Cytometry Part A","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Validation of an Optimized DuraClone Phenotyping Kit Workflow for TBNK Subset Quantification.\",\"authors\":\"Carlos Agustin Villegas-Valverde, Imilla Casado Hernandez, Yaima Zuñiga Rosales, Fatma Abdou, Shadi Sharif Shamat, Antonio Alfonso Bencomo-Hernandez, Yendry Ventura-Carmenate\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/cyto.a.24967\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Quantification of T-cells, B-cells, and NK-cells assay is crucial for diagnosing and monitoring immune diseases and evaluating lymphodepleting therapies. To standardize and validate an optimized workflow of the Beckman Coulter DuraClone IM Phenotyping Basic Kit for quantification of TBNK subsets in peripheral blood. Procedural changes included the use of an alternative lysis buffer, the addition of counting beads, the elimination of centrifugation steps, and an increase in acquisition volume. Validation followed CLSI H42-A2 and H62 guidelines, assessing accuracy, precision, linearity, and limit of quantification (LLOQ). Accuracy was evaluated by comparison with Immuno-Trol controls and by Bland-Altman analysis against standard immunophenotyping methods. External proficiency was assessed through participation in the College of American Pathologists (CAP) TBNK program in 2024. Procedural steps were reduced by 50%, and processing time by 38.6%. The modified method demonstrated high accuracy (-3 < bias < 35; cells/μL), a low bias based on Immuno-Trol targets, and strong agreement in the Bland-Altman analysis. The method successfully passed three CAP external proficiency tests in 2024, confirming interlaboratory reliability. Coefficients of variation for precision were below 10% for all subsets. Linearity exceeded R<sup>2</sup> > 0.99 across clinically relevant ranges. Most subsets demonstrated an LLOQ below 10-50 cells/μL, which is suitable for clinical applications. The proposed modifications to the DuraClone IM kit protocol improved workflow efficiency and analytical performance without compromising accuracy or reproducibility. The validated method provides a standardized, reliable, and time-efficient alternative for lymphocyte subset quantification.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11068,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cytometry Part A\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cytometry Part A\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"99\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/cyto.a.24967\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"生物学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cytometry Part A","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/cyto.a.24967","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS","Score":null,"Total":0}
Validation of an Optimized DuraClone Phenotyping Kit Workflow for TBNK Subset Quantification.
Quantification of T-cells, B-cells, and NK-cells assay is crucial for diagnosing and monitoring immune diseases and evaluating lymphodepleting therapies. To standardize and validate an optimized workflow of the Beckman Coulter DuraClone IM Phenotyping Basic Kit for quantification of TBNK subsets in peripheral blood. Procedural changes included the use of an alternative lysis buffer, the addition of counting beads, the elimination of centrifugation steps, and an increase in acquisition volume. Validation followed CLSI H42-A2 and H62 guidelines, assessing accuracy, precision, linearity, and limit of quantification (LLOQ). Accuracy was evaluated by comparison with Immuno-Trol controls and by Bland-Altman analysis against standard immunophenotyping methods. External proficiency was assessed through participation in the College of American Pathologists (CAP) TBNK program in 2024. Procedural steps were reduced by 50%, and processing time by 38.6%. The modified method demonstrated high accuracy (-3 < bias < 35; cells/μL), a low bias based on Immuno-Trol targets, and strong agreement in the Bland-Altman analysis. The method successfully passed three CAP external proficiency tests in 2024, confirming interlaboratory reliability. Coefficients of variation for precision were below 10% for all subsets. Linearity exceeded R2 > 0.99 across clinically relevant ranges. Most subsets demonstrated an LLOQ below 10-50 cells/μL, which is suitable for clinical applications. The proposed modifications to the DuraClone IM kit protocol improved workflow efficiency and analytical performance without compromising accuracy or reproducibility. The validated method provides a standardized, reliable, and time-efficient alternative for lymphocyte subset quantification.
期刊介绍:
Cytometry Part A, the journal of quantitative single-cell analysis, features original research reports and reviews of innovative scientific studies employing quantitative single-cell measurement, separation, manipulation, and modeling techniques, as well as original articles on mechanisms of molecular and cellular functions obtained by cytometry techniques.
The journal welcomes submissions from multiple research fields that fully embrace the study of the cytome:
Biomedical Instrumentation Engineering
Biophotonics
Bioinformatics
Cell Biology
Computational Biology
Data Science
Immunology
Parasitology
Microbiology
Neuroscience
Cancer
Stem Cells
Tissue Regeneration.