使用世卫组织安全指数的医院备灾比较描述性分析:来自印度东部的一项多中心研究。

IF 2.3 3区 医学 Q1 EMERGENCY MEDICINE
Kumar Guru Mishra, Nabnita Patnaik, Nihar Ranjan Pradhan, Adityananda Mohapatra, Sheikh Mohd Saleem
{"title":"使用世卫组织安全指数的医院备灾比较描述性分析:来自印度东部的一项多中心研究。","authors":"Kumar Guru Mishra, Nabnita Patnaik, Nihar Ranjan Pradhan, Adityananda Mohapatra, Sheikh Mohd Saleem","doi":"10.1186/s12873-025-01248-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Hospital disaster preparedness is crucial for maintaining healthcare delivery during emergencies, yet significant gaps persist in developing nations. This study evaluated disaster preparedness levels across thirteen tertiary care hospitals in Eastern India using the World Health Organization (WHO) Hospital Safety Index framework.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A cross-sectional observational study was conducted in thirteen tertiary care hospitals (400-550 beds each) in Khordha District, Odisha, during January 2020-December 2023. Assessment utilized Module-4 of the WHO Safe Hospital Checklist, comprising seven sub-modules and 40 evaluation criteria. Data collection involved direct observation, document review, and semi-structured interviews. A three-tier scoring system (0-2.5 points) was employed to calculate safety indices.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall safety indices ranged from 0.412 to 0.782, with significant inter-hospital variations. Four hospitals demonstrated high preparedness (indices > 0.66), while three hospitals showed critical deficiencies (indices < 0.45). Logistics and finance management showed uniform high preparedness (8.75/10) across all facilities. Major gaps were identified in emergency response planning, with the lowest mean score (4.60) and highest variability (CV = 67.2%). Communication systems and evacuation protocols showed considerable variation (scores ranging 1.25-7.5/10).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The study reveals substantial disparities in disaster preparedness among regional tertiary care facilities. While some hospitals demonstrate robust emergency management systems, others require significant improvements. Findings suggest the need for standardized protocols, regular assessment, and knowledge sharing between institutions to enhance regional healthcare disaster resilience.</p><p><strong>Clinical trial number: </strong>Not applicable.</p>","PeriodicalId":9002,"journal":{"name":"BMC Emergency Medicine","volume":"25 1","pages":"201"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12505759/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparative descriptive analysis of hospital disaster preparedness using WHO safety index: a multi-center study from Eastern India.\",\"authors\":\"Kumar Guru Mishra, Nabnita Patnaik, Nihar Ranjan Pradhan, Adityananda Mohapatra, Sheikh Mohd Saleem\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s12873-025-01248-2\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Hospital disaster preparedness is crucial for maintaining healthcare delivery during emergencies, yet significant gaps persist in developing nations. This study evaluated disaster preparedness levels across thirteen tertiary care hospitals in Eastern India using the World Health Organization (WHO) Hospital Safety Index framework.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A cross-sectional observational study was conducted in thirteen tertiary care hospitals (400-550 beds each) in Khordha District, Odisha, during January 2020-December 2023. Assessment utilized Module-4 of the WHO Safe Hospital Checklist, comprising seven sub-modules and 40 evaluation criteria. Data collection involved direct observation, document review, and semi-structured interviews. A three-tier scoring system (0-2.5 points) was employed to calculate safety indices.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall safety indices ranged from 0.412 to 0.782, with significant inter-hospital variations. Four hospitals demonstrated high preparedness (indices > 0.66), while three hospitals showed critical deficiencies (indices < 0.45). Logistics and finance management showed uniform high preparedness (8.75/10) across all facilities. Major gaps were identified in emergency response planning, with the lowest mean score (4.60) and highest variability (CV = 67.2%). Communication systems and evacuation protocols showed considerable variation (scores ranging 1.25-7.5/10).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The study reveals substantial disparities in disaster preparedness among regional tertiary care facilities. While some hospitals demonstrate robust emergency management systems, others require significant improvements. Findings suggest the need for standardized protocols, regular assessment, and knowledge sharing between institutions to enhance regional healthcare disaster resilience.</p><p><strong>Clinical trial number: </strong>Not applicable.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9002,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BMC Emergency Medicine\",\"volume\":\"25 1\",\"pages\":\"201\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12505759/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BMC Emergency Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12873-025-01248-2\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"EMERGENCY MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Emergency Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12873-025-01248-2","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

导读:医院备灾对于在紧急情况下维持医疗服务至关重要,但发展中国家仍存在巨大差距。本研究利用世界卫生组织(世卫组织)医院安全指数框架评估了印度东部13家三级保健医院的备灾水平。方法:于2020年1月至2023年12月在奥里萨邦Khordha区的13家三级医院(每家400-550张床位)进行横断面观察研究。评估采用了世卫组织安全医院核对表第4模块,其中包括7个子模块和40个评价标准。数据收集包括直接观察、文件审查和半结构化访谈。安全指标采用三级评分体系(0-2.5分)计算。结果:总体安全指数范围为0.412 ~ 0.782,医院间差异显著。4家医院表现出高备灾水平(指数> 0.66),而3家医院表现出严重不足(指数> 0.66)。结论:该研究揭示了区域三级医疗机构在备灾方面的巨大差异。虽然一些医院展示了强大的应急管理系统,但其他医院需要进行重大改进。研究结果表明,需要标准化协议、定期评估和机构之间的知识共享,以增强区域医疗保健抗灾能力。临床试验号:不适用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Comparative descriptive analysis of hospital disaster preparedness using WHO safety index: a multi-center study from Eastern India.

Comparative descriptive analysis of hospital disaster preparedness using WHO safety index: a multi-center study from Eastern India.

Comparative descriptive analysis of hospital disaster preparedness using WHO safety index: a multi-center study from Eastern India.

Comparative descriptive analysis of hospital disaster preparedness using WHO safety index: a multi-center study from Eastern India.

Introduction: Hospital disaster preparedness is crucial for maintaining healthcare delivery during emergencies, yet significant gaps persist in developing nations. This study evaluated disaster preparedness levels across thirteen tertiary care hospitals in Eastern India using the World Health Organization (WHO) Hospital Safety Index framework.

Methods: A cross-sectional observational study was conducted in thirteen tertiary care hospitals (400-550 beds each) in Khordha District, Odisha, during January 2020-December 2023. Assessment utilized Module-4 of the WHO Safe Hospital Checklist, comprising seven sub-modules and 40 evaluation criteria. Data collection involved direct observation, document review, and semi-structured interviews. A three-tier scoring system (0-2.5 points) was employed to calculate safety indices.

Results: Overall safety indices ranged from 0.412 to 0.782, with significant inter-hospital variations. Four hospitals demonstrated high preparedness (indices > 0.66), while three hospitals showed critical deficiencies (indices < 0.45). Logistics and finance management showed uniform high preparedness (8.75/10) across all facilities. Major gaps were identified in emergency response planning, with the lowest mean score (4.60) and highest variability (CV = 67.2%). Communication systems and evacuation protocols showed considerable variation (scores ranging 1.25-7.5/10).

Conclusion: The study reveals substantial disparities in disaster preparedness among regional tertiary care facilities. While some hospitals demonstrate robust emergency management systems, others require significant improvements. Findings suggest the need for standardized protocols, regular assessment, and knowledge sharing between institutions to enhance regional healthcare disaster resilience.

Clinical trial number: Not applicable.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
BMC Emergency Medicine
BMC Emergency Medicine Medicine-Emergency Medicine
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
8.00%
发文量
178
审稿时长
29 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Emergency Medicine is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all urgent and emergency aspects of medicine, in both practice and basic research. In addition, the journal covers aspects of disaster medicine and medicine in special locations, such as conflict areas and military medicine, together with articles concerning healthcare services in the emergency departments.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信