连续内收管阻断斜入路对全膝关节置换术术后镇痛的疗效:一项随机、双盲、对照临床试验。

IF 1.3 Q2 ANESTHESIOLOGY
Anesthesiology Research and Practice Pub Date : 2025-09-30 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1155/anrp/3267589
Zhen Wan, Haiming Liao, Jinhuo Qin, Simin Tang, Jingjing Su, Jun Zhou
{"title":"连续内收管阻断斜入路对全膝关节置换术术后镇痛的疗效:一项随机、双盲、对照临床试验。","authors":"Zhen Wan, Haiming Liao, Jinhuo Qin, Simin Tang, Jingjing Su, Jun Zhou","doi":"10.1155/anrp/3267589","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Continuous adductor canal block (CACB) is a highly effective analgesic technique in total knee arthroplasty. The brachy axis approach (BA) is currently the common method used for CACB. Although CACB for BA offers advantages such as easy localization and operation due to clear anatomy, it has limitations such as short catheter placement and a high dislocation rate. These limitations can result in insufficient postoperative analgesia and impact patient rehabilitation. The perineural catheters placed parallel for CACB increases the difficulty of operation and the risk of puncture injury. In this study, the authors first applied the oblique approach (OA) to CACB and systematically compared the postoperative analgesic effects and adverse reactions of these two CACB methods with different puncture angles.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Ninety subjects who underwent TKA were randomly assigned to receive ultrasound-guided CACB using either the OA or BA. The main outcome measured was the exercise maximum visual analog scale (VAS) score at 72 h after surgery. The main safety indicator was the rate of catheter dislocation. The data were recorded and analyzed using analysis of variance, with adjustments made for baseline characteristics.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There was no statistical difference in catheter placement time or postoperative resting VAS between the two groups. However, the postoperative exercise VAS and the incidence of postoperative adverse effects were lower in the OA group compared to the BA group.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The OA of CACB applied after TKA improved the analgesic effect during the postoperative motor state compared to the BA and reduced the incidence of adverse reactions, without increasing the catheterization procedure time.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>Chinese Clinical Trial Registry: ChiCTR2200059889.</p>","PeriodicalId":7834,"journal":{"name":"Anesthesiology Research and Practice","volume":"2025 ","pages":"3267589"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12503995/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Efficacy of Continuous Adductor Canal Block Oblique Approach to Postoperative Analgesia After Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Randomized, Double-Blinded, Controlled Clinical Trial.\",\"authors\":\"Zhen Wan, Haiming Liao, Jinhuo Qin, Simin Tang, Jingjing Su, Jun Zhou\",\"doi\":\"10.1155/anrp/3267589\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Continuous adductor canal block (CACB) is a highly effective analgesic technique in total knee arthroplasty. The brachy axis approach (BA) is currently the common method used for CACB. Although CACB for BA offers advantages such as easy localization and operation due to clear anatomy, it has limitations such as short catheter placement and a high dislocation rate. These limitations can result in insufficient postoperative analgesia and impact patient rehabilitation. The perineural catheters placed parallel for CACB increases the difficulty of operation and the risk of puncture injury. In this study, the authors first applied the oblique approach (OA) to CACB and systematically compared the postoperative analgesic effects and adverse reactions of these two CACB methods with different puncture angles.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Ninety subjects who underwent TKA were randomly assigned to receive ultrasound-guided CACB using either the OA or BA. The main outcome measured was the exercise maximum visual analog scale (VAS) score at 72 h after surgery. The main safety indicator was the rate of catheter dislocation. The data were recorded and analyzed using analysis of variance, with adjustments made for baseline characteristics.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There was no statistical difference in catheter placement time or postoperative resting VAS between the two groups. However, the postoperative exercise VAS and the incidence of postoperative adverse effects were lower in the OA group compared to the BA group.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The OA of CACB applied after TKA improved the analgesic effect during the postoperative motor state compared to the BA and reduced the incidence of adverse reactions, without increasing the catheterization procedure time.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>Chinese Clinical Trial Registry: ChiCTR2200059889.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7834,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Anesthesiology Research and Practice\",\"volume\":\"2025 \",\"pages\":\"3267589\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12503995/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Anesthesiology Research and Practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1155/anrp/3267589\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ANESTHESIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Anesthesiology Research and Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/anrp/3267589","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:连续内收管阻滞(CACB)是全膝关节置换术中一种非常有效的镇痛技术。短轴法(brachy axis approach, BA)是目前常用的CACB方法。尽管由于解剖清晰,CACB治疗BA具有定位方便、操作方便等优点,但也存在导管放置时间短、脱位率高的局限性。这些限制可能导致术后镇痛不足,影响患者康复。平行置管增加了操作难度和穿刺损伤的风险。本研究首次采用斜入路(OA)行CACB,系统比较了两种不同穿刺角度CACB的术后镇痛效果及不良反应。方法:90例经TKA的患者随机分配超声引导下使用OA或BA进行CACB。主要观察结果为术后72h运动最大视觉模拟评分(VAS)。主要安全指标为导管脱位率。使用方差分析对数据进行记录和分析,并对基线特征进行调整。结果:两组患者置管时间及术后静息VAS评分均无统计学差异。但OA组术后运动VAS评分及术后不良反应发生率均低于BA组。结论:在不增加置管时间的情况下,TKA后应用CACB OA较BA改善了术后运动状态下的镇痛效果,减少了不良反应的发生。试验注册:中国临床试验注册中心:ChiCTR2200059889。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Efficacy of Continuous Adductor Canal Block Oblique Approach to Postoperative Analgesia After Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Randomized, Double-Blinded, Controlled Clinical Trial.

Background: Continuous adductor canal block (CACB) is a highly effective analgesic technique in total knee arthroplasty. The brachy axis approach (BA) is currently the common method used for CACB. Although CACB for BA offers advantages such as easy localization and operation due to clear anatomy, it has limitations such as short catheter placement and a high dislocation rate. These limitations can result in insufficient postoperative analgesia and impact patient rehabilitation. The perineural catheters placed parallel for CACB increases the difficulty of operation and the risk of puncture injury. In this study, the authors first applied the oblique approach (OA) to CACB and systematically compared the postoperative analgesic effects and adverse reactions of these two CACB methods with different puncture angles.

Methods: Ninety subjects who underwent TKA were randomly assigned to receive ultrasound-guided CACB using either the OA or BA. The main outcome measured was the exercise maximum visual analog scale (VAS) score at 72 h after surgery. The main safety indicator was the rate of catheter dislocation. The data were recorded and analyzed using analysis of variance, with adjustments made for baseline characteristics.

Results: There was no statistical difference in catheter placement time or postoperative resting VAS between the two groups. However, the postoperative exercise VAS and the incidence of postoperative adverse effects were lower in the OA group compared to the BA group.

Conclusions: The OA of CACB applied after TKA improved the analgesic effect during the postoperative motor state compared to the BA and reduced the incidence of adverse reactions, without increasing the catheterization procedure time.

Trial registration: Chinese Clinical Trial Registry: ChiCTR2200059889.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
29
审稿时长
18 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信