基于医学图像的卵巢癌人工智能检测:近十年回顾(2013-2023)

IF 12.1 2区 工程技术 Q1 COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS
Amir Reza Naderi Yaghouti, Ahmad Shalbaf, Roohallah Alizadehsani, Ru-San Tan, Anushya Vijayananthan, Chai Hong Yeong, U. Rajendra Acharya
{"title":"基于医学图像的卵巢癌人工智能检测:近十年回顾(2013-2023)","authors":"Amir Reza Naderi Yaghouti,&nbsp;Ahmad Shalbaf,&nbsp;Roohallah Alizadehsani,&nbsp;Ru-San Tan,&nbsp;Anushya Vijayananthan,&nbsp;Chai Hong Yeong,&nbsp;U. Rajendra Acharya","doi":"10.1007/s11831-025-10268-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The symptoms of ovarian cancer are nonspecific, and current screening methods lack sufficient accuracy for early diagnosis. This often leads to detection at a later, more advanced stage of the disease. Medical imaging provides morphological and functional data to help characterize ovarian tumors, but more research is needed to develop reliable early screening tools. This review examines recent machine learning techniques applied to imaging data for improving ovarian cancer detection and diagnosis. A literature search was conducted on PubMed, IEEE, and ACM databases for studies from 2010 to 2023 utilizing machine learning with ultrasound, magnetic resonance imaging, computed tomography, or other imaging data and clinical records to detect ovarian cancer. Key information extracted included imaging modality and clinical recordings, machine learning methods, classification tasks, performance metrics, and datasets. This work identified 81 relevant studies. Artificial intelligence approaches included traditional methods like support vector machines, random forest and logistic regression, and deep learning models like convolutional neural networks, vision transformers, and graph neural networks. Most studies focused on the binary classification of benign vs. malignant adnexal masses. The range of reported diagnostic accuracy across different modalities is 75–99%. Deep learning generally outperformed traditional machine learning models. Consequently, machine learning, especially deep learning, shows promising performance in detecting ovarian cancer from medical images. However, the heterogeneity of imaging protocols, data labeling biases, model interpretability, and validation on multi-center datasets is challenging. Future work should focus on robust and generalizable solutions that can be deployed as clinical tools for improving ovarian cancer outcomes.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":55473,"journal":{"name":"Archives of Computational Methods in Engineering","volume":"32 7","pages":"4093 - 4124"},"PeriodicalIF":12.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Artificial Intelligence for Ovarian Cancer Detection with Medical Images: A Review of the Last Decade (2013–2023)\",\"authors\":\"Amir Reza Naderi Yaghouti,&nbsp;Ahmad Shalbaf,&nbsp;Roohallah Alizadehsani,&nbsp;Ru-San Tan,&nbsp;Anushya Vijayananthan,&nbsp;Chai Hong Yeong,&nbsp;U. Rajendra Acharya\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s11831-025-10268-x\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>The symptoms of ovarian cancer are nonspecific, and current screening methods lack sufficient accuracy for early diagnosis. This often leads to detection at a later, more advanced stage of the disease. Medical imaging provides morphological and functional data to help characterize ovarian tumors, but more research is needed to develop reliable early screening tools. This review examines recent machine learning techniques applied to imaging data for improving ovarian cancer detection and diagnosis. A literature search was conducted on PubMed, IEEE, and ACM databases for studies from 2010 to 2023 utilizing machine learning with ultrasound, magnetic resonance imaging, computed tomography, or other imaging data and clinical records to detect ovarian cancer. Key information extracted included imaging modality and clinical recordings, machine learning methods, classification tasks, performance metrics, and datasets. This work identified 81 relevant studies. Artificial intelligence approaches included traditional methods like support vector machines, random forest and logistic regression, and deep learning models like convolutional neural networks, vision transformers, and graph neural networks. Most studies focused on the binary classification of benign vs. malignant adnexal masses. The range of reported diagnostic accuracy across different modalities is 75–99%. Deep learning generally outperformed traditional machine learning models. Consequently, machine learning, especially deep learning, shows promising performance in detecting ovarian cancer from medical images. However, the heterogeneity of imaging protocols, data labeling biases, model interpretability, and validation on multi-center datasets is challenging. Future work should focus on robust and generalizable solutions that can be deployed as clinical tools for improving ovarian cancer outcomes.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":55473,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Archives of Computational Methods in Engineering\",\"volume\":\"32 7\",\"pages\":\"4093 - 4124\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":12.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Archives of Computational Methods in Engineering\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11831-025-10268-x\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of Computational Methods in Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11831-025-10268-x","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

卵巢癌的症状是非特异性的,目前的筛查方法在早期诊断方面缺乏足够的准确性。这往往导致在疾病的较晚、较晚期才被发现。医学影像提供了形态学和功能数据来帮助表征卵巢肿瘤,但需要更多的研究来开发可靠的早期筛查工具。本文综述了最近应用于影像学数据的机器学习技术,以改善卵巢癌的检测和诊断。在PubMed、IEEE和ACM数据库中检索2010年至2023年利用机器学习结合超声、磁共振成像、计算机断层扫描或其他成像数据和临床记录检测卵巢癌的研究。提取的关键信息包括成像模式和临床记录、机器学习方法、分类任务、性能指标和数据集。这项工作确定了81项相关研究。人工智能方法包括传统方法,如支持向量机、随机森林和逻辑回归,以及深度学习模型,如卷积神经网络、视觉变压器和图神经网络。大多数研究集中在良性和恶性附件肿块的二元分类上。报告的诊断准确度在不同模式的范围是75-99%。深度学习通常优于传统的机器学习模型。因此,机器学习,特别是深度学习,在从医学图像中检测卵巢癌方面显示出很好的性能。然而,成像方案的异质性、数据标记偏差、模型可解释性和多中心数据集的验证是具有挑战性的。未来的工作应该集中在强大的和可推广的解决方案,可以部署作为临床工具,改善卵巢癌的结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Artificial Intelligence for Ovarian Cancer Detection with Medical Images: A Review of the Last Decade (2013–2023)

The symptoms of ovarian cancer are nonspecific, and current screening methods lack sufficient accuracy for early diagnosis. This often leads to detection at a later, more advanced stage of the disease. Medical imaging provides morphological and functional data to help characterize ovarian tumors, but more research is needed to develop reliable early screening tools. This review examines recent machine learning techniques applied to imaging data for improving ovarian cancer detection and diagnosis. A literature search was conducted on PubMed, IEEE, and ACM databases for studies from 2010 to 2023 utilizing machine learning with ultrasound, magnetic resonance imaging, computed tomography, or other imaging data and clinical records to detect ovarian cancer. Key information extracted included imaging modality and clinical recordings, machine learning methods, classification tasks, performance metrics, and datasets. This work identified 81 relevant studies. Artificial intelligence approaches included traditional methods like support vector machines, random forest and logistic regression, and deep learning models like convolutional neural networks, vision transformers, and graph neural networks. Most studies focused on the binary classification of benign vs. malignant adnexal masses. The range of reported diagnostic accuracy across different modalities is 75–99%. Deep learning generally outperformed traditional machine learning models. Consequently, machine learning, especially deep learning, shows promising performance in detecting ovarian cancer from medical images. However, the heterogeneity of imaging protocols, data labeling biases, model interpretability, and validation on multi-center datasets is challenging. Future work should focus on robust and generalizable solutions that can be deployed as clinical tools for improving ovarian cancer outcomes.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
19.80
自引率
4.10%
发文量
153
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Archives of Computational Methods in Engineering Aim and Scope: Archives of Computational Methods in Engineering serves as an active forum for disseminating research and advanced practices in computational engineering, particularly focusing on mechanics and related fields. The journal emphasizes extended state-of-the-art reviews in selected areas, a unique feature of its publication. Review Format: Reviews published in the journal offer: A survey of current literature Critical exposition of topics in their full complexity By organizing the information in this manner, readers can quickly grasp the focus, coverage, and unique features of the Archives of Computational Methods in Engineering.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信