自动验证化学结构:1H NMR和IR光谱的强大结合

IF 7.4 1区 化学 Q1 CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
J. Benji Rowlands, Lina Jonsson, Jonathan Goodman, Peter Howe, Werngard Czechtizky, Tomas Leek, Richard James Lewis
{"title":"自动验证化学结构:1H NMR和IR光谱的强大结合","authors":"J. Benji Rowlands, Lina Jonsson, Jonathan Goodman, Peter Howe, Werngard Czechtizky, Tomas Leek, Richard James Lewis","doi":"10.1039/d5sc06866e","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Human interpretation of spectroscopic data remains key to confirming newly synthesised chemical structures. Whilst there have been advances in automated spectral interpretation, the false positive and false negative rates remain too high to replace human interpretation. One approach, Automated Structure Verification (ASV), scores observed nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectra against predicted NMR spectra. We describe a method to extend this approach to infrared (IR) spectra and apply it alongside proton NMR spectra to distinguish between a challenging set of 99 similar isomer pairs. Based on relative scores, we classify each as correct, incorrect or unsolved. Our results show that IR can be used as an efficient automated method to distinguish similar isomers with an accuracy close to that of proton NMR. We further introduce a method to combine NMR and IR results and show that the combination significantly outperforms either technique alone. At a true positive rate of 90%, unsolved pairs are reduced to 0-15% using NMR and IR together compared to 27-49% using individual techniques alone. At a true positive rate of 95%, they are reduced to 15-30% from 39-70%. These results are a significant step towards efficient automated structure verification based on easily measured spectroscopy data.","PeriodicalId":9909,"journal":{"name":"Chemical Science","volume":"17 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":7.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Towards automatically verifying chemical structures: the powerful combination of 1H NMR and IR spectroscopy\",\"authors\":\"J. Benji Rowlands, Lina Jonsson, Jonathan Goodman, Peter Howe, Werngard Czechtizky, Tomas Leek, Richard James Lewis\",\"doi\":\"10.1039/d5sc06866e\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Human interpretation of spectroscopic data remains key to confirming newly synthesised chemical structures. Whilst there have been advances in automated spectral interpretation, the false positive and false negative rates remain too high to replace human interpretation. One approach, Automated Structure Verification (ASV), scores observed nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectra against predicted NMR spectra. We describe a method to extend this approach to infrared (IR) spectra and apply it alongside proton NMR spectra to distinguish between a challenging set of 99 similar isomer pairs. Based on relative scores, we classify each as correct, incorrect or unsolved. Our results show that IR can be used as an efficient automated method to distinguish similar isomers with an accuracy close to that of proton NMR. We further introduce a method to combine NMR and IR results and show that the combination significantly outperforms either technique alone. At a true positive rate of 90%, unsolved pairs are reduced to 0-15% using NMR and IR together compared to 27-49% using individual techniques alone. At a true positive rate of 95%, they are reduced to 15-30% from 39-70%. These results are a significant step towards efficient automated structure verification based on easily measured spectroscopy data.\",\"PeriodicalId\":9909,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Chemical Science\",\"volume\":\"17 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":7.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Chemical Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"92\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1039/d5sc06866e\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"化学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Chemical Science","FirstCategoryId":"92","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1039/d5sc06866e","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

人类对光谱数据的解释仍然是确认新合成化学结构的关键。虽然在自动光谱解释方面取得了进展,但假阳性和假阴性率仍然太高,无法取代人工解释。一种方法是自动结构验证(ASV),将观察到的核磁共振(NMR)波谱与预测的核磁共振波谱进行评分。我们描述了一种方法,将这种方法扩展到红外(IR)光谱,并将其与质子核磁共振光谱一起应用,以区分一组具有挑战性的99个类似异构体对。基于相对分数,我们将每个分类为正确、不正确或未解决。我们的结果表明,红外光谱可以作为一种有效的自动化方法来区分类似的异构体,其精度接近质子核磁共振。我们进一步介绍了一种结合核磁共振和红外结果的方法,并表明这种组合明显优于单独使用任何一种技术。在真阳性率为90%的情况下,与单独使用单个技术的27-49%相比,NMR和IR一起使用未解决的对减少到0-15%。在95%的真阳性率下,它们从39-70%减少到15-30%。这些结果是朝着基于易于测量的光谱数据的高效自动化结构验证迈出的重要一步。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Towards automatically verifying chemical structures: the powerful combination of 1H NMR and IR spectroscopy
Human interpretation of spectroscopic data remains key to confirming newly synthesised chemical structures. Whilst there have been advances in automated spectral interpretation, the false positive and false negative rates remain too high to replace human interpretation. One approach, Automated Structure Verification (ASV), scores observed nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectra against predicted NMR spectra. We describe a method to extend this approach to infrared (IR) spectra and apply it alongside proton NMR spectra to distinguish between a challenging set of 99 similar isomer pairs. Based on relative scores, we classify each as correct, incorrect or unsolved. Our results show that IR can be used as an efficient automated method to distinguish similar isomers with an accuracy close to that of proton NMR. We further introduce a method to combine NMR and IR results and show that the combination significantly outperforms either technique alone. At a true positive rate of 90%, unsolved pairs are reduced to 0-15% using NMR and IR together compared to 27-49% using individual techniques alone. At a true positive rate of 95%, they are reduced to 15-30% from 39-70%. These results are a significant step towards efficient automated structure verification based on easily measured spectroscopy data.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Chemical Science
Chemical Science CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
14.40
自引率
4.80%
发文量
1352
审稿时长
2.1 months
期刊介绍: Chemical Science is a journal that encompasses various disciplines within the chemical sciences. Its scope includes publishing ground-breaking research with significant implications for its respective field, as well as appealing to a wider audience in related areas. To be considered for publication, articles must showcase innovative and original advances in their field of study and be presented in a manner that is understandable to scientists from diverse backgrounds. However, the journal generally does not publish highly specialized research.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信