{"title":"分子普查以阐明无膜细胞器的分离机制","authors":"Cheryn Ali, Fernando Muzzopappa, Fabian Erdel","doi":"10.1186/s13059-025-03806-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Cells contain membraneless organelles that have been proposed to form via phase separation involving dense networks of multivalent intermolecular interactions. As it is notoriously difficult to experimentally distinguish punctate structures formed by phase separation from those formed by other mechanisms, this issue is controversial. To complement experimental assays, we present a computational by-the-numbers approach to phase separation. We mine publicly available datasets to perform a molecular census of prominent subnuclear organelles in mouse embryonic stem cells: nucleoli, transcriptional condensates, heterochromatin foci, and Polycomb bodies. We estimate copy numbers and intermolecular distances and compare the latter to the Debye length, which is the characteristic distance over which intermolecular interactions typically occur. We find that none of the organelles studied here contain any protein species that shows intermolecular distances below the estimated Debye length if molecules in the organelles are randomly distributed, which disfavors the classical one-component phase separation scenario. Considering multiple species based on databases of phase-separating proteins, we find that nucleoli and transcriptional condensates are compatible with multi-component phase separation driven by proteins and RNAs, while heterochromatin foci and Polycomb bodies are better explained by a model in which proteins bind to chromatin without phase-separating via dense multivalent interaction networks. We also provide an interactive tool that allows testing of alternative multi-component scenarios. We introduce a computational by-the-numbers approach to benchmark different demixing models that may explain the assembly of membraneless organelles. Our results suggest that cells use different mechanisms to form subnuclear organelles with different biophysical properties.","PeriodicalId":12611,"journal":{"name":"Genome Biology","volume":"50 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":10.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A molecular census to elucidate the demixing mechanism of membraneless organelles\",\"authors\":\"Cheryn Ali, Fernando Muzzopappa, Fabian Erdel\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s13059-025-03806-0\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Cells contain membraneless organelles that have been proposed to form via phase separation involving dense networks of multivalent intermolecular interactions. As it is notoriously difficult to experimentally distinguish punctate structures formed by phase separation from those formed by other mechanisms, this issue is controversial. To complement experimental assays, we present a computational by-the-numbers approach to phase separation. We mine publicly available datasets to perform a molecular census of prominent subnuclear organelles in mouse embryonic stem cells: nucleoli, transcriptional condensates, heterochromatin foci, and Polycomb bodies. We estimate copy numbers and intermolecular distances and compare the latter to the Debye length, which is the characteristic distance over which intermolecular interactions typically occur. We find that none of the organelles studied here contain any protein species that shows intermolecular distances below the estimated Debye length if molecules in the organelles are randomly distributed, which disfavors the classical one-component phase separation scenario. Considering multiple species based on databases of phase-separating proteins, we find that nucleoli and transcriptional condensates are compatible with multi-component phase separation driven by proteins and RNAs, while heterochromatin foci and Polycomb bodies are better explained by a model in which proteins bind to chromatin without phase-separating via dense multivalent interaction networks. We also provide an interactive tool that allows testing of alternative multi-component scenarios. We introduce a computational by-the-numbers approach to benchmark different demixing models that may explain the assembly of membraneless organelles. Our results suggest that cells use different mechanisms to form subnuclear organelles with different biophysical properties.\",\"PeriodicalId\":12611,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Genome Biology\",\"volume\":\"50 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":10.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Genome Biology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"99\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13059-025-03806-0\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"生物学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Genome Biology","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13059-025-03806-0","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
A molecular census to elucidate the demixing mechanism of membraneless organelles
Cells contain membraneless organelles that have been proposed to form via phase separation involving dense networks of multivalent intermolecular interactions. As it is notoriously difficult to experimentally distinguish punctate structures formed by phase separation from those formed by other mechanisms, this issue is controversial. To complement experimental assays, we present a computational by-the-numbers approach to phase separation. We mine publicly available datasets to perform a molecular census of prominent subnuclear organelles in mouse embryonic stem cells: nucleoli, transcriptional condensates, heterochromatin foci, and Polycomb bodies. We estimate copy numbers and intermolecular distances and compare the latter to the Debye length, which is the characteristic distance over which intermolecular interactions typically occur. We find that none of the organelles studied here contain any protein species that shows intermolecular distances below the estimated Debye length if molecules in the organelles are randomly distributed, which disfavors the classical one-component phase separation scenario. Considering multiple species based on databases of phase-separating proteins, we find that nucleoli and transcriptional condensates are compatible with multi-component phase separation driven by proteins and RNAs, while heterochromatin foci and Polycomb bodies are better explained by a model in which proteins bind to chromatin without phase-separating via dense multivalent interaction networks. We also provide an interactive tool that allows testing of alternative multi-component scenarios. We introduce a computational by-the-numbers approach to benchmark different demixing models that may explain the assembly of membraneless organelles. Our results suggest that cells use different mechanisms to form subnuclear organelles with different biophysical properties.
Genome BiologyBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology-Genetics
CiteScore
21.00
自引率
3.30%
发文量
241
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍:
Genome Biology stands as a premier platform for exceptional research across all domains of biology and biomedicine, explored through a genomic and post-genomic lens.
With an impressive impact factor of 12.3 (2022),* the journal secures its position as the 3rd-ranked research journal in the Genetics and Heredity category and the 2nd-ranked research journal in the Biotechnology and Applied Microbiology category by Thomson Reuters. Notably, Genome Biology holds the distinction of being the highest-ranked open-access journal in this category.
Our dedicated team of highly trained in-house Editors collaborates closely with our esteemed Editorial Board of international experts, ensuring the journal remains on the forefront of scientific advances and community standards. Regular engagement with researchers at conferences and institute visits underscores our commitment to staying abreast of the latest developments in the field.