肿瘤患者经股插入中心导管的性能和安全性:一个病例系列分析。

IF 1.7 3区 医学 Q3 PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE
María Teresa Parejo Arrondo, Berta Griso Jurado, Lourdes Bayona Escat, Gloria Ortiz-Miluy, Inmaculada C Grau Farrús, Josep Gumà
{"title":"肿瘤患者经股插入中心导管的性能和安全性:一个病例系列分析。","authors":"María Teresa Parejo Arrondo, Berta Griso Jurado, Lourdes Bayona Escat, Gloria Ortiz-Miluy, Inmaculada C Grau Farrús, Josep Gumà","doi":"10.1177/11297298251375510","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Selection of vascular access devices (VADs) is critical for successful intravenous therapy, especially in oncology patients requiring long-term central VADs. In cases where upper-body venous access is not viable, femoral access has traditionally been avoided due to higher infection and thrombosis risks. However, new protocols and technologies have redefined the safety and feasibility of femorally inserted central catheters (FICCs).</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study evaluates the outcomes of FICC insertions in oncology patients at a tertiary hospital in Spain, using advanced techniques including ultrasound-guided insertion, tunneling, and tip confirmation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective observational study was conducted in 2025 with 25 cancer patients who required elective central DAVs and lacked viable upper-body veins between November 2021 and June 2024. All procedures were performed by an experienced vascular access nurse, following the RaFeVA and SIF protocols. Data on demographics, catheter type, vein selection, complications, and dwell time were collected and analyzed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 25 FICCs were inserted. The superficial femoral vein was used in 84% of cases. No catheter-related bloodstream infections (CRBSIs) or symptomatic thromboses were reported. Mean dwell time varied according to treatment duration and patient survival, with several catheters remaining functional at data cutoff. Ultrasound-guided tip confirmation ensured proper positioning in the inferior vena cava.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>When inserted using modern protocols and technologies, FICCs offer a safe and effective alternative for oncology patients without viable upper-body venous access. This approach minimizes complications and enables timely catheter placement, supporting the broader adoption of lower-body central access in specific patient populations.</p>","PeriodicalId":56113,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Vascular Access","volume":" ","pages":"11297298251375510"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Performance and safety of Femorally Inserted Central Catheters in oncological patients: A cases series analysis.\",\"authors\":\"María Teresa Parejo Arrondo, Berta Griso Jurado, Lourdes Bayona Escat, Gloria Ortiz-Miluy, Inmaculada C Grau Farrús, Josep Gumà\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/11297298251375510\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Selection of vascular access devices (VADs) is critical for successful intravenous therapy, especially in oncology patients requiring long-term central VADs. In cases where upper-body venous access is not viable, femoral access has traditionally been avoided due to higher infection and thrombosis risks. However, new protocols and technologies have redefined the safety and feasibility of femorally inserted central catheters (FICCs).</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study evaluates the outcomes of FICC insertions in oncology patients at a tertiary hospital in Spain, using advanced techniques including ultrasound-guided insertion, tunneling, and tip confirmation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective observational study was conducted in 2025 with 25 cancer patients who required elective central DAVs and lacked viable upper-body veins between November 2021 and June 2024. All procedures were performed by an experienced vascular access nurse, following the RaFeVA and SIF protocols. Data on demographics, catheter type, vein selection, complications, and dwell time were collected and analyzed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 25 FICCs were inserted. The superficial femoral vein was used in 84% of cases. No catheter-related bloodstream infections (CRBSIs) or symptomatic thromboses were reported. Mean dwell time varied according to treatment duration and patient survival, with several catheters remaining functional at data cutoff. Ultrasound-guided tip confirmation ensured proper positioning in the inferior vena cava.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>When inserted using modern protocols and technologies, FICCs offer a safe and effective alternative for oncology patients without viable upper-body venous access. This approach minimizes complications and enables timely catheter placement, supporting the broader adoption of lower-body central access in specific patient populations.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":56113,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Vascular Access\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"11297298251375510\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Vascular Access\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/11297298251375510\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Vascular Access","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/11297298251375510","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:血管通路装置(VADs)的选择对于静脉治疗的成功至关重要,特别是对于需要长期中心VADs的肿瘤患者。在上半身静脉通路不可行的情况下,由于较高的感染和血栓形成风险,传统上避免了股骨通路。然而,新的方案和技术已经重新定义了股骨插入中心导管(FICCs)的安全性和可行性。目的:本研究评估西班牙一家三级医院肿瘤患者FICC插入的结果,使用先进的技术,包括超声引导插入,隧道和尖端确认。方法:回顾性观察研究于2025年在2021年11月至2024年6月期间对25例需要选择性中央dav且缺乏可行上肢静脉的癌症患者进行了回顾性观察研究。所有手术均由经验丰富的血管通路护士执行,遵循RaFeVA和SIF协议。收集和分析人口统计学、导管类型、静脉选择、并发症和停留时间的数据。结果:共插入ficc 25枚。84%的病例采用股浅静脉。没有导管相关性血流感染(CRBSIs)或症状性血栓形成的报道。平均停留时间根据治疗时间和患者生存时间而变化,在数据截止时,有几根导管仍具有功能。超声引导下的针尖确认确保了下腔静脉的正确定位。结论:当采用现代方案和技术插入时,FICCs为没有可行的上肢静脉通道的肿瘤患者提供了安全有效的替代方案。这种方法最大限度地减少了并发症,并能够及时放置导管,支持在特定患者群体中更广泛地采用下半身中心通路。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Performance and safety of Femorally Inserted Central Catheters in oncological patients: A cases series analysis.

Background: Selection of vascular access devices (VADs) is critical for successful intravenous therapy, especially in oncology patients requiring long-term central VADs. In cases where upper-body venous access is not viable, femoral access has traditionally been avoided due to higher infection and thrombosis risks. However, new protocols and technologies have redefined the safety and feasibility of femorally inserted central catheters (FICCs).

Objective: This study evaluates the outcomes of FICC insertions in oncology patients at a tertiary hospital in Spain, using advanced techniques including ultrasound-guided insertion, tunneling, and tip confirmation.

Methods: A retrospective observational study was conducted in 2025 with 25 cancer patients who required elective central DAVs and lacked viable upper-body veins between November 2021 and June 2024. All procedures were performed by an experienced vascular access nurse, following the RaFeVA and SIF protocols. Data on demographics, catheter type, vein selection, complications, and dwell time were collected and analyzed.

Results: A total of 25 FICCs were inserted. The superficial femoral vein was used in 84% of cases. No catheter-related bloodstream infections (CRBSIs) or symptomatic thromboses were reported. Mean dwell time varied according to treatment duration and patient survival, with several catheters remaining functional at data cutoff. Ultrasound-guided tip confirmation ensured proper positioning in the inferior vena cava.

Conclusion: When inserted using modern protocols and technologies, FICCs offer a safe and effective alternative for oncology patients without viable upper-body venous access. This approach minimizes complications and enables timely catheter placement, supporting the broader adoption of lower-body central access in specific patient populations.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Vascular Access
Journal of Vascular Access 医学-外周血管病
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
31.60%
发文量
181
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Vascular Access (JVA) is issued six times per year; it considers the publication of original manuscripts dealing with clinical and laboratory investigations in the fast growing field of vascular access. In addition reviews, case reports and clinical trials are welcome, as well as papers dedicated to more practical aspects covering new devices and techniques. All contributions, coming from all over the world, undergo the peer-review process. The Journal of Vascular Access is divided into independent sections, each led by Editors of the highest scientific level: • Dialysis • Oncology • Interventional radiology • Nutrition • Nursing • Intensive care Correspondence related to published papers is also welcome.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信