了解接受远程监测的2型糖尿病患者的胰岛素剂量偏差。

IF 2.3
Jannie Toft Damsgaard Nørlev, Thomas Kronborg, Morten Hasselstrøm Jensen, Peter Vestergaard, Stine Hangaard
{"title":"了解接受远程监测的2型糖尿病患者的胰岛素剂量偏差。","authors":"Jannie Toft Damsgaard Nørlev, Thomas Kronborg, Morten Hasselstrøm Jensen, Peter Vestergaard, Stine Hangaard","doi":"10.1016/j.pcd.2025.10.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>Although telemonitoring has emerged as a strategy to overcome barriers related to poor adherence, insulin dose deviations remain common. Yet, the reason remains unclear. This study investigated the reasons for dose deviations in people with insulin-treated type 2 diabetes (T2D) receiving telemonitoring.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data were provided from 331 participants with insulin-treated T2D (DiaMonT, NCT04981808). Participants were either telemonitored using a continuous glucose monitor (CGM), a connected insulin pen, and an activity watch or treated according to standard of care, using blinded devices. Reasons for dose deviations were categorized, and descriptive statistics were used to summarize the findings.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 24 distinct reasons for insulin dose deviations were reported. These were grouped into: (1) actual deviations (40.1 %; n = 148) (e.g., limited understanding of T2D and access to CGM data), (2) justified deviations (40.7 %; n = 150) (e.g., illness and use of a non-connected pen), and (3) device-related deviations (19.2 %; n = 71) (e.g., technical issues).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study highlights the need for a nuanced interpretation of adherence data and suggests that telemonitoring should engage patients in treatment discussions and support education in diabetes self-management. These insights are key to maximizing the benefits of telemonitoring while avoiding misinterpretation or over-intervention.</p>","PeriodicalId":94177,"journal":{"name":"Primary care diabetes","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Understanding insulin dose deviations in people with type 2 diabetes receiving telemonitoring.\",\"authors\":\"Jannie Toft Damsgaard Nørlev, Thomas Kronborg, Morten Hasselstrøm Jensen, Peter Vestergaard, Stine Hangaard\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.pcd.2025.10.001\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>Although telemonitoring has emerged as a strategy to overcome barriers related to poor adherence, insulin dose deviations remain common. Yet, the reason remains unclear. This study investigated the reasons for dose deviations in people with insulin-treated type 2 diabetes (T2D) receiving telemonitoring.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data were provided from 331 participants with insulin-treated T2D (DiaMonT, NCT04981808). Participants were either telemonitored using a continuous glucose monitor (CGM), a connected insulin pen, and an activity watch or treated according to standard of care, using blinded devices. Reasons for dose deviations were categorized, and descriptive statistics were used to summarize the findings.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 24 distinct reasons for insulin dose deviations were reported. These were grouped into: (1) actual deviations (40.1 %; n = 148) (e.g., limited understanding of T2D and access to CGM data), (2) justified deviations (40.7 %; n = 150) (e.g., illness and use of a non-connected pen), and (3) device-related deviations (19.2 %; n = 71) (e.g., technical issues).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study highlights the need for a nuanced interpretation of adherence data and suggests that telemonitoring should engage patients in treatment discussions and support education in diabetes self-management. These insights are key to maximizing the benefits of telemonitoring while avoiding misinterpretation or over-intervention.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":94177,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Primary care diabetes\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Primary care diabetes\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pcd.2025.10.001\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Primary care diabetes","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pcd.2025.10.001","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:尽管远程监测已成为克服不良依从性障碍的一种策略,但胰岛素剂量偏差仍然很常见。然而,原因尚不清楚。本研究调查了接受远程监护的胰岛素治疗2型糖尿病(T2D)患者剂量偏差的原因。方法:数据来自331名胰岛素治疗的t2dm患者(DiaMonT, NCT04981808)。参与者要么使用连续血糖监测仪(CGM)、连接胰岛素笔和活动表进行远程监测,要么使用盲法设备进行标准护理。对剂量偏差的原因进行分类,并采用描述性统计对结果进行总结。结果:共报道了24种不同的胰岛素剂量偏差原因。这些都是分为:(1)实际偏差(40.1 %;n = 148)(例如,有限的理解T2D和CGM数据),(2)合理的偏差(40.7 %;n = 150)(例如,疾病和使用non-connected笔),和(3)device-related偏差(19.2 %;n = 71)(例如,技术问题)。结论:本研究强调需要对依从性数据进行细致入微的解释,并建议远程监测应使患者参与治疗讨论,并支持糖尿病自我管理教育。这些见解对于最大限度地发挥远程监控的优势,同时避免误解或过度干预至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Understanding insulin dose deviations in people with type 2 diabetes receiving telemonitoring.

Aims: Although telemonitoring has emerged as a strategy to overcome barriers related to poor adherence, insulin dose deviations remain common. Yet, the reason remains unclear. This study investigated the reasons for dose deviations in people with insulin-treated type 2 diabetes (T2D) receiving telemonitoring.

Methods: Data were provided from 331 participants with insulin-treated T2D (DiaMonT, NCT04981808). Participants were either telemonitored using a continuous glucose monitor (CGM), a connected insulin pen, and an activity watch or treated according to standard of care, using blinded devices. Reasons for dose deviations were categorized, and descriptive statistics were used to summarize the findings.

Results: A total of 24 distinct reasons for insulin dose deviations were reported. These were grouped into: (1) actual deviations (40.1 %; n = 148) (e.g., limited understanding of T2D and access to CGM data), (2) justified deviations (40.7 %; n = 150) (e.g., illness and use of a non-connected pen), and (3) device-related deviations (19.2 %; n = 71) (e.g., technical issues).

Conclusions: This study highlights the need for a nuanced interpretation of adherence data and suggests that telemonitoring should engage patients in treatment discussions and support education in diabetes self-management. These insights are key to maximizing the benefits of telemonitoring while avoiding misinterpretation or over-intervention.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信