区域麻醉促进小口径静脉患者的瘘管形成:单中心队列。

IF 1.7 3区 医学 Q3 PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE
Yaman Alsabbagh, Young Erben, Adeeb Jlilati, Joaquin Sarmiento, Santh Prakash Lanka, Christopher B Robards, Alberto E Ardon, Steven R Clendenen, Jonathan Vandenberg, Christopher Jacobs, Houssam Farres
{"title":"区域麻醉促进小口径静脉患者的瘘管形成:单中心队列。","authors":"Yaman Alsabbagh, Young Erben, Adeeb Jlilati, Joaquin Sarmiento, Santh Prakash Lanka, Christopher B Robards, Alberto E Ardon, Steven R Clendenen, Jonathan Vandenberg, Christopher Jacobs, Houssam Farres","doi":"10.1177/11297298251382268","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate the efficacy of regional anesthesia (RA) in enabling arteriovenous fistula (AVF) creation in patients with small-caliber veins who would typically receive arteriovenous grafts (AVG), and to compare access outcomes between AVF and AVG cohorts.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a retrospective analysis of a prospectively maintained database from 2018 through 2024 involving patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) requiring access creation. Eligible patients were those aged 18 years or older with inadequate veins for AVF creation based on initial ultrasound vein mapping. All patients underwent RA prior to the access creation and had a repeated intraoperative vein mapping at least 30 min after RA. Patients whose veins were sufficiently dilated and met the criteria for AVF creation underwent AVF formation; otherwise, an AVG was created. Outcomes included access maturation, patency rates, access failure, abandonment, and mortality. Statistical analysis was performed using R software, with significance set at <i>p</i> < 0.05.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 106 patients, 67 (63.2%) underwent AVF creation post-RA due to sufficient vein dilation, while 39 (36.8%) received AVGs. Baseline vein diameters and comorbidities were comparable between groups. AVF maturation was achieved in 83.6% of AVF patients, with longer times to successful cannulation compared to AVG (median 187.0 vs 80.0 days, <i>p</i> = 0.037). Kaplan-Meier analysis revealed no difference in primary patency (<i>p</i> = 0.97), but AVF patients had superior primary assisted (<i>p</i> = 0.015) and secondary patency (<i>p</i> = 0.033), and lower access failure rates (<i>p</i> = 0.034) compared to AVG patients. Access abandonment and mortality rates did not differ significantly between groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>RA-induced venodilation enables the use of veins previously deemed inadequate for AVF creation, leading to improved access outcomes compared to AVG placement. Implementing RA may increase AVF utilization and enhance patient outcomes in hemodialysis access surgery.</p>","PeriodicalId":56113,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Vascular Access","volume":" ","pages":"11297298251382268"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Regional anesthesia facilitates fistula creation over graft in patients with small-caliber veins: A single-center cohort.\",\"authors\":\"Yaman Alsabbagh, Young Erben, Adeeb Jlilati, Joaquin Sarmiento, Santh Prakash Lanka, Christopher B Robards, Alberto E Ardon, Steven R Clendenen, Jonathan Vandenberg, Christopher Jacobs, Houssam Farres\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/11297298251382268\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate the efficacy of regional anesthesia (RA) in enabling arteriovenous fistula (AVF) creation in patients with small-caliber veins who would typically receive arteriovenous grafts (AVG), and to compare access outcomes between AVF and AVG cohorts.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a retrospective analysis of a prospectively maintained database from 2018 through 2024 involving patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) requiring access creation. Eligible patients were those aged 18 years or older with inadequate veins for AVF creation based on initial ultrasound vein mapping. All patients underwent RA prior to the access creation and had a repeated intraoperative vein mapping at least 30 min after RA. Patients whose veins were sufficiently dilated and met the criteria for AVF creation underwent AVF formation; otherwise, an AVG was created. Outcomes included access maturation, patency rates, access failure, abandonment, and mortality. Statistical analysis was performed using R software, with significance set at <i>p</i> < 0.05.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 106 patients, 67 (63.2%) underwent AVF creation post-RA due to sufficient vein dilation, while 39 (36.8%) received AVGs. Baseline vein diameters and comorbidities were comparable between groups. AVF maturation was achieved in 83.6% of AVF patients, with longer times to successful cannulation compared to AVG (median 187.0 vs 80.0 days, <i>p</i> = 0.037). Kaplan-Meier analysis revealed no difference in primary patency (<i>p</i> = 0.97), but AVF patients had superior primary assisted (<i>p</i> = 0.015) and secondary patency (<i>p</i> = 0.033), and lower access failure rates (<i>p</i> = 0.034) compared to AVG patients. Access abandonment and mortality rates did not differ significantly between groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>RA-induced venodilation enables the use of veins previously deemed inadequate for AVF creation, leading to improved access outcomes compared to AVG placement. Implementing RA may increase AVF utilization and enhance patient outcomes in hemodialysis access surgery.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":56113,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Vascular Access\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"11297298251382268\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Vascular Access\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/11297298251382268\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Vascular Access","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/11297298251382268","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:评价区域麻醉(RA)对小口径静脉(通常接受动静脉移植物(AVG))患者产生动静脉瘘(AVF)的效果,并比较AVF和AVG队列的准入结果。方法:我们对2018年至2024年前瞻性维护的数据库进行了回顾性分析,该数据库涉及需要创建通路的慢性肾脏疾病(CKD)患者。符合条件的患者是那些年龄在18岁或以上,根据最初的超声静脉测绘,静脉不适合产生AVF的患者。所有患者在通道创建之前都经历了RA,并且在RA后至少30分钟进行了重复的术中静脉测绘。静脉充分扩张且符合AVF形成标准的患者行AVF形成;否则,表示AVG创建成功。结果包括通路成熟度、通畅率、通路失败、放弃和死亡率。结果:106例患者中,67例(63.2%)患者因ra后静脉充分扩张而产生AVF, 39例(36.8%)患者接受avg。两组之间的基线静脉直径和合并症具有可比性。83.6%的AVF患者实现了AVF成熟,与AVG相比,成功插管的时间更长(中位187.0天vs 80.0天,p = 0.037)。Kaplan-Meier分析显示原发性通畅无差异(p = 0.97),但与AVG患者相比,AVF患者具有更好的原发性辅助通畅(p = 0.015)和继发性通畅(p = 0.033),且通道失败率更低(p = 0.034)。在两组之间,放弃获取途径和死亡率没有显著差异。结论:与放置AVG相比,ra诱导的静脉通气可以利用以前被认为不足以产生AVF的静脉,从而改善通路结果。实施RA可能会增加AVF的利用率,并提高血液透析通路手术患者的预后。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Regional anesthesia facilitates fistula creation over graft in patients with small-caliber veins: A single-center cohort.

Objective: To evaluate the efficacy of regional anesthesia (RA) in enabling arteriovenous fistula (AVF) creation in patients with small-caliber veins who would typically receive arteriovenous grafts (AVG), and to compare access outcomes between AVF and AVG cohorts.

Methods: We conducted a retrospective analysis of a prospectively maintained database from 2018 through 2024 involving patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) requiring access creation. Eligible patients were those aged 18 years or older with inadequate veins for AVF creation based on initial ultrasound vein mapping. All patients underwent RA prior to the access creation and had a repeated intraoperative vein mapping at least 30 min after RA. Patients whose veins were sufficiently dilated and met the criteria for AVF creation underwent AVF formation; otherwise, an AVG was created. Outcomes included access maturation, patency rates, access failure, abandonment, and mortality. Statistical analysis was performed using R software, with significance set at p < 0.05.

Results: Of the 106 patients, 67 (63.2%) underwent AVF creation post-RA due to sufficient vein dilation, while 39 (36.8%) received AVGs. Baseline vein diameters and comorbidities were comparable between groups. AVF maturation was achieved in 83.6% of AVF patients, with longer times to successful cannulation compared to AVG (median 187.0 vs 80.0 days, p = 0.037). Kaplan-Meier analysis revealed no difference in primary patency (p = 0.97), but AVF patients had superior primary assisted (p = 0.015) and secondary patency (p = 0.033), and lower access failure rates (p = 0.034) compared to AVG patients. Access abandonment and mortality rates did not differ significantly between groups.

Conclusions: RA-induced venodilation enables the use of veins previously deemed inadequate for AVF creation, leading to improved access outcomes compared to AVG placement. Implementing RA may increase AVF utilization and enhance patient outcomes in hemodialysis access surgery.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Vascular Access
Journal of Vascular Access 医学-外周血管病
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
31.60%
发文量
181
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Vascular Access (JVA) is issued six times per year; it considers the publication of original manuscripts dealing with clinical and laboratory investigations in the fast growing field of vascular access. In addition reviews, case reports and clinical trials are welcome, as well as papers dedicated to more practical aspects covering new devices and techniques. All contributions, coming from all over the world, undergo the peer-review process. The Journal of Vascular Access is divided into independent sections, each led by Editors of the highest scientific level: • Dialysis • Oncology • Interventional radiology • Nutrition • Nursing • Intensive care Correspondence related to published papers is also welcome.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信