自然作为桥梁:森林思想作为无家可归者的生态社会工作实践。

IF 1.4
Eva Gallén-Granell, Eduardo Marques, Mercedes Botija
{"title":"自然作为桥梁:森林思想作为无家可归者的生态社会工作实践。","authors":"Eva Gallén-Granell, Eduardo Marques, Mercedes Botija","doi":"10.1080/26408066.2025.2560076","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This article presents the systematization of a pilot nature-based intervention, Forest Mind, conducted with individuals experiencing homelessness in the Azores Islands, Portugal. The aim is to explore how structured engagement with natural environments can promote psychosocial wellbeing and foster social inclusion, within an evidence-based and ecosocial social work framework.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A mixed-methods design was employed. Quantitative data were collected using the short version of the Profile of Mood States (POMS) and the Nature Relatedness Scale (NRS), administered before and after the intervention. Qualitative data were gathered through a focus group and a semi-structured interview. The intervention consisted of four nature-based sessions following the Forest Mind methodology, guided by trained facilitators and adapted to the context of homelessness.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Quantitative findings show an improvement in emotional wellbeing, including reductions in tension and fatigue and increases in vigor and connection to nature. Qualitative data highlight the participants' sensory and emotional experiences with the forest environment, the emergence of mutual support, and a sense of belonging. The co-construction of meaning around nature and care was central to the intervention's perceived benefits.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>The study demonstrates that nature-based interventions can contribute to psychosocial wellbeing and community-building among socially excluded populations. It supports an evidence-based approach that integrates professional expertise, participant values, and emerging empirical knowledge.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Forest Mind is a promising practice for ecosocial work. The findings advocate for considering access to restorative natural environments as a fundamental right in social intervention frameworks.</p>","PeriodicalId":73742,"journal":{"name":"Journal of evidence-based social work (2019)","volume":" ","pages":"1-16"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Nature as a Bridge: Forest Mind as an Ecosocial Work Practice for Homelessness.\",\"authors\":\"Eva Gallén-Granell, Eduardo Marques, Mercedes Botija\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/26408066.2025.2560076\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This article presents the systematization of a pilot nature-based intervention, Forest Mind, conducted with individuals experiencing homelessness in the Azores Islands, Portugal. The aim is to explore how structured engagement with natural environments can promote psychosocial wellbeing and foster social inclusion, within an evidence-based and ecosocial social work framework.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A mixed-methods design was employed. Quantitative data were collected using the short version of the Profile of Mood States (POMS) and the Nature Relatedness Scale (NRS), administered before and after the intervention. Qualitative data were gathered through a focus group and a semi-structured interview. The intervention consisted of four nature-based sessions following the Forest Mind methodology, guided by trained facilitators and adapted to the context of homelessness.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Quantitative findings show an improvement in emotional wellbeing, including reductions in tension and fatigue and increases in vigor and connection to nature. Qualitative data highlight the participants' sensory and emotional experiences with the forest environment, the emergence of mutual support, and a sense of belonging. The co-construction of meaning around nature and care was central to the intervention's perceived benefits.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>The study demonstrates that nature-based interventions can contribute to psychosocial wellbeing and community-building among socially excluded populations. It supports an evidence-based approach that integrates professional expertise, participant values, and emerging empirical knowledge.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Forest Mind is a promising practice for ecosocial work. The findings advocate for considering access to restorative natural environments as a fundamental right in social intervention frameworks.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":73742,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of evidence-based social work (2019)\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-16\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of evidence-based social work (2019)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/26408066.2025.2560076\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of evidence-based social work (2019)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/26408066.2025.2560076","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:本文介绍了一项基于自然的干预试验的系统化,森林思想,在葡萄牙亚速尔群岛对无家可归的个人进行了研究。目的是探索在基于证据和生态社会的社会工作框架内,与自然环境的结构化接触如何促进社会心理健康和促进社会包容。材料与方法:采用混合方法设计。在干预前后分别使用短版本的情绪状态量表(POMS)和自然关联量表(NRS)收集定量数据。定性数据通过焦点小组和半结构化访谈收集。干预包括四次基于自然的会议,遵循森林思维方法,由训练有素的调解员指导,并适应无家可归的情况。结果:定量研究结果显示情绪健康得到改善,包括紧张和疲劳的减少,活力和与自然的联系增加。定性数据强调了参与者对森林环境的感官和情感体验,相互支持和归属感的出现。围绕自然和护理的意义的共同构建是干预的感知利益的核心。讨论:该研究表明,基于自然的干预措施可以促进社会排斥人群的心理健康和社区建设。它支持一种基于证据的方法,该方法集成了专业知识、参与者价值观和新兴的经验知识。结论:“森林心灵”是一个很有前途的生态社会工作实践。研究结果提倡在社会干预框架中将获得恢复性自然环境视为一项基本权利。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Nature as a Bridge: Forest Mind as an Ecosocial Work Practice for Homelessness.

Purpose: This article presents the systematization of a pilot nature-based intervention, Forest Mind, conducted with individuals experiencing homelessness in the Azores Islands, Portugal. The aim is to explore how structured engagement with natural environments can promote psychosocial wellbeing and foster social inclusion, within an evidence-based and ecosocial social work framework.

Materials and methods: A mixed-methods design was employed. Quantitative data were collected using the short version of the Profile of Mood States (POMS) and the Nature Relatedness Scale (NRS), administered before and after the intervention. Qualitative data were gathered through a focus group and a semi-structured interview. The intervention consisted of four nature-based sessions following the Forest Mind methodology, guided by trained facilitators and adapted to the context of homelessness.

Results: Quantitative findings show an improvement in emotional wellbeing, including reductions in tension and fatigue and increases in vigor and connection to nature. Qualitative data highlight the participants' sensory and emotional experiences with the forest environment, the emergence of mutual support, and a sense of belonging. The co-construction of meaning around nature and care was central to the intervention's perceived benefits.

Discussion: The study demonstrates that nature-based interventions can contribute to psychosocial wellbeing and community-building among socially excluded populations. It supports an evidence-based approach that integrates professional expertise, participant values, and emerging empirical knowledge.

Conclusion: Forest Mind is a promising practice for ecosocial work. The findings advocate for considering access to restorative natural environments as a fundamental right in social intervention frameworks.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信