中心静脉通路装置:以护理为主导的血管通路组实施及并发症发生率评估的回顾性研究。

IF 1.7 3区 医学 Q3 PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE
Shori Gerardot, Matthew Pope-Filos, Bronte Yono, Kamal Patel, Bryan Roberts, Sangeetha Nanthabalan
{"title":"中心静脉通路装置:以护理为主导的血管通路组实施及并发症发生率评估的回顾性研究。","authors":"Shori Gerardot, Matthew Pope-Filos, Bronte Yono, Kamal Patel, Bryan Roberts, Sangeetha Nanthabalan","doi":"10.1177/11297298251376977","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Physicians have historically performed insertions of Central Venous Access Devices (CVADs). The ability to successfully place CVADs has increased with the implementation of ultrasound techniques to include safer placement and lower complications. The implementation of nursing lead vascular access teams (VATs) has become popular in hospitals for securing and maintaining access. This study aims to review a nursing lead team placing CVADs in comparison to physicians.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The study was a retrospective single center study. Utilizing the VAT nurse procedure logs from 01/01/2019 to 06/30/2021, evaluation using chart review was performed to assess for: performing team, location of access, and any complications during and after the placement of central access. The data was stored on REDCAP data analysis tool without any protected health identification. After all the data was collected, it was sent for statistical analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In this study, the primary outcome was an evaluation for difference in immediate complications between the physician and VAT group in insertion of CVADs. Analysis of 395 procedures for complications, including both Femoral (82) and Jugular (313) CVADs were evaluated based on the inserting team, physician (131) and VAT staff (264). The procedures were compared for immediate and delayed complications.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>The complication rates and success rates were similar in both groups. Despite the study lacking enough power to be statistically significant, the outcomes of this study are promising, introducing new pathways for vascular access to accommodate both non-critically and critically ill patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":56113,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Vascular Access","volume":" ","pages":"11297298251376977"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Central venous access devices: Retrospective study of the implementation of a nursing led vascular access team and evaluation of complication rates.\",\"authors\":\"Shori Gerardot, Matthew Pope-Filos, Bronte Yono, Kamal Patel, Bryan Roberts, Sangeetha Nanthabalan\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/11297298251376977\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Physicians have historically performed insertions of Central Venous Access Devices (CVADs). The ability to successfully place CVADs has increased with the implementation of ultrasound techniques to include safer placement and lower complications. The implementation of nursing lead vascular access teams (VATs) has become popular in hospitals for securing and maintaining access. This study aims to review a nursing lead team placing CVADs in comparison to physicians.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The study was a retrospective single center study. Utilizing the VAT nurse procedure logs from 01/01/2019 to 06/30/2021, evaluation using chart review was performed to assess for: performing team, location of access, and any complications during and after the placement of central access. The data was stored on REDCAP data analysis tool without any protected health identification. After all the data was collected, it was sent for statistical analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In this study, the primary outcome was an evaluation for difference in immediate complications between the physician and VAT group in insertion of CVADs. Analysis of 395 procedures for complications, including both Femoral (82) and Jugular (313) CVADs were evaluated based on the inserting team, physician (131) and VAT staff (264). The procedures were compared for immediate and delayed complications.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>The complication rates and success rates were similar in both groups. Despite the study lacking enough power to be statistically significant, the outcomes of this study are promising, introducing new pathways for vascular access to accommodate both non-critically and critically ill patients.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":56113,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Vascular Access\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"11297298251376977\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Vascular Access\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/11297298251376977\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Vascular Access","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/11297298251376977","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

简介:历史上,医生进行了中心静脉通路装置(CVADs)的插入。成功放置cvad的能力随着超声技术的实施而增加,包括更安全的放置和更低的并发症。实施护理领导血管通道小组(VATs)已成为流行的医院,以确保和维持通道。本研究旨在回顾护理领导团队将cvad与内科医生进行比较。方法:采用回顾性单中心研究。利用2019年1月1日至2021年6月30日的VAT护理程序日志,使用图表审查进行评估,以评估:执行团队,通路位置以及放置中央通路期间和之后的任何并发症。数据存储在REDCAP数据分析工具中,没有任何受保护的健康标识。所有数据收集完毕后,送去进行统计分析。结果:在这项研究中,主要结果是评估医师组和VAT组在插入CVADs时即刻并发症的差异。对395例手术并发症进行分析,包括股骨(82例)和颈静脉(313例)CVADs,评估基于插入团队、医师(131例)和VAT工作人员(264例)。比较两种手术的即时和延迟并发症。讨论:两组的并发症发生率和成功率相似。尽管这项研究缺乏足够的统计意义,但这项研究的结果是有希望的,它引入了新的血管通路,以适应非危重病人和危重病人。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Central venous access devices: Retrospective study of the implementation of a nursing led vascular access team and evaluation of complication rates.

Introduction: Physicians have historically performed insertions of Central Venous Access Devices (CVADs). The ability to successfully place CVADs has increased with the implementation of ultrasound techniques to include safer placement and lower complications. The implementation of nursing lead vascular access teams (VATs) has become popular in hospitals for securing and maintaining access. This study aims to review a nursing lead team placing CVADs in comparison to physicians.

Methods: The study was a retrospective single center study. Utilizing the VAT nurse procedure logs from 01/01/2019 to 06/30/2021, evaluation using chart review was performed to assess for: performing team, location of access, and any complications during and after the placement of central access. The data was stored on REDCAP data analysis tool without any protected health identification. After all the data was collected, it was sent for statistical analysis.

Results: In this study, the primary outcome was an evaluation for difference in immediate complications between the physician and VAT group in insertion of CVADs. Analysis of 395 procedures for complications, including both Femoral (82) and Jugular (313) CVADs were evaluated based on the inserting team, physician (131) and VAT staff (264). The procedures were compared for immediate and delayed complications.

Discussion: The complication rates and success rates were similar in both groups. Despite the study lacking enough power to be statistically significant, the outcomes of this study are promising, introducing new pathways for vascular access to accommodate both non-critically and critically ill patients.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Vascular Access
Journal of Vascular Access 医学-外周血管病
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
31.60%
发文量
181
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Vascular Access (JVA) is issued six times per year; it considers the publication of original manuscripts dealing with clinical and laboratory investigations in the fast growing field of vascular access. In addition reviews, case reports and clinical trials are welcome, as well as papers dedicated to more practical aspects covering new devices and techniques. All contributions, coming from all over the world, undergo the peer-review process. The Journal of Vascular Access is divided into independent sections, each led by Editors of the highest scientific level: • Dialysis • Oncology • Interventional radiology • Nutrition • Nursing • Intensive care Correspondence related to published papers is also welcome.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信