Humberto Monsivais, Xinming Liu, Frank Dong, Megan C Jacobsen, John Rong, Corey T Jensen, Ke Li
{"title":"Three-dimensional noise characteristics of clinical photon counting detector CT.","authors":"Humberto Monsivais, Xinming Liu, Frank Dong, Megan C Jacobsen, John Rong, Corey T Jensen, Ke Li","doi":"10.1002/mp.70067","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Since the introduction of whole-body photon-counting detector CT (PCD-CT) into clinical practice, extensive physics assessments have been conducted to elucidate its image quality advantages over energy-integrating detector CT (EID-CT) and to support its clinical adoption. However, evaluations of its three-dimensional (3D) noise power spectrum (NPS), which simultaneously quantifies in-plane and through-plane noise texture and magnitude, remain limited.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To experimentally evaluate the 3D NPS of an NAEOTOM Alpha PCD-CT system and its dependence on scan mode, reconstruction image type, quantum iterative reconstruction (QIR) strength, mono-energy (keV) level, spiral pitch, and radiation dose.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Repeated scans of a 20 cm water phantom and a 30 cm PMMA phantom were conducted under the clinical Standard mode, clinical Ultra-High-Resolution (UHR) mode, and an Expert Service mode. Reconstructed image types include T3D, virtual monoenergetic image (VMI), and T1 (a linear reconstruction of total-energy bin available via the Expert Service mode). Data were collected at seven dose levels (0.4-24 mGy) and four spiral pitch levels (0.35-1.5). T3D and VMI images were reconstructed with varying QIR strengths, and VMIs were reconstructed at energies ranging from 40 to 190 keV. The 3D NPS, <math> <semantics><mrow><mi>NP</mi> <msub><mi>S</mi> <mrow><mn>3</mn> <mi>D</mi></mrow> </msub> <mrow><mo>(</mo> <mrow><msub><mi>k</mi> <mi>x</mi></msub> <mo>,</mo> <msub><mi>k</mi> <mi>y</mi></msub> <mo>,</mo> <msub><mi>k</mi> <mi>z</mi></msub> </mrow> <mo>)</mo></mrow> </mrow> <annotation>${\\mathrm{NP}}{{\\mathrm{S}}_{3{\\mathrm{D}}}}( {{k_x},{k_y},{k_z}} )$</annotation></semantics> </math> , was calculated from each ensemble of 3D image volumes. Axial <math> <semantics><mrow><mi>NP</mi> <msub><mi>S</mi> <mrow><mn>2</mn> <mi>D</mi></mrow> </msub> <mrow><mo>(</mo> <msub><mi>k</mi> <mrow><mi>x</mi> <mi>y</mi></mrow> </msub> <mo>)</mo></mrow> </mrow> <annotation>${\\mathrm{NP}}{{\\mathrm{S}}_{2{\\mathrm{D}}}}( {{k_{xy}}} )$</annotation></semantics> </math> was obtained by integrating NPS<sub>3D</sub> along <math> <semantics><msub><mi>k</mi> <mi>z</mi></msub> <annotation>${k_z}$</annotation></semantics> </math> , while <math> <semantics><mrow><mi>NP</mi> <msub><mi>S</mi> <mrow><mn>1</mn> <mi>D</mi></mrow> </msub> <mrow><mo>(</mo> <msub><mi>k</mi> <mi>z</mi></msub> <mo>)</mo></mrow> </mrow> <annotation>${\\mathrm{NP}}{{\\mathrm{S}}_{1{\\mathrm{D}}}}( {{k_z}} )$</annotation></semantics> </math> was obtained by integrating NPS<sub>3D</sub> over <math> <semantics><msub><mi>k</mi> <mi>x</mi></msub> <annotation>${k_x}$</annotation></semantics> </math> and <math> <semantics><msub><mi>k</mi> <mi>y</mi></msub> <annotation>${k_y}$</annotation></semantics> </math> .</p><p><strong>Results: </strong><math> <semantics><mrow><mi>NP</mi> <msub><mi>S</mi> <mrow><mn>1</mn> <mi>D</mi></mrow> </msub> <mrow><mo>(</mo> <msub><mi>k</mi> <mi>z</mi></msub> <mo>)</mo></mrow> </mrow> <annotation>${\\mathrm{NP}}{{\\mathrm{S}}_{1{\\mathrm{D}}}}( {{k_z}} )$</annotation></semantics> </math> of T1 images were flat, indicating no noise correlation across PCD rows. In contrast, all clinical-mode reconstructions exhibited through-plane noise correlation, as reflected in the shape of their <math> <semantics><mrow><mi>NP</mi> <msub><mi>S</mi> <mrow><mn>1</mn> <mi>D</mi></mrow> </msub> <mrow><mo>(</mo> <msub><mi>k</mi> <mi>z</mi></msub> <mo>)</mo></mrow> </mrow> <annotation>${\\mathrm{NP}}{{\\mathrm{S}}_{1{\\mathrm{D}}}}( {{k_z}} )$</annotation></semantics> </math> . For clinical-mode reconstructions, the shape of their 3D NPS showed a mild to moderate dependence on dose, with lower doses producing NPS profiles shifted towards lower frequencies in both axial and z directions. With a matched post-object radiation exposure, the larger phantom resulted in higher noise and stronger noise correlation compared to the smaller phantom. QIR only mildly enhanced noise correlation. For a given CTDI<sub>vol</sub>, spiral pitch has a negligible impact on 3D NPS. Due to through-plane noise correlation, the variance of T3D and VMI decreases with slice thickness ( <math> <semantics><mrow><mi>Δ</mi> <mi>z</mi></mrow> <annotation>$\\Delta z$</annotation></semantics> </math> ) approximately as <math> <semantics><mrow><mi>Δ</mi> <msup><mi>z</mi> <mrow><mo>-</mo> <mn>0.9</mn></mrow> </msup> </mrow> <annotation>${{\\Delta}}{z^{ - 0.9}}$</annotation></semantics> </math> , in contrast to the <math> <semantics><mrow><mi>Δ</mi> <msup><mi>z</mi> <mrow><mo>-</mo> <mn>1.0</mn></mrow> </msup> </mrow> <annotation>${{\\Delta}}{z^{ - 1.0}}$</annotation></semantics> </math> scaling observed in T1 images. The shape of the 3D NPS of VMI showed only weak dependence on the keV level along the axial frequency direction. Compared to the Standard mode, the UHR mode reduced image variance by 26% when using a soft-tissue (Br44) kernel and by 77% with a sharp (Br76) kernel. However, 3D NPS analysis revealed stronger through-plane noise correlation in UHR images.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The 3D NPS provides new insight into the noise characteristics of PCD-CT: Noise in the native PCD-CT projection data is uncorrelated across detector rows, but clinical reconstruction processes introduce noise spatial correlation along both axial and z directions, particularly at higher QIR strengths, lower radiation doses, or with larger image objects that increase the percentage of scattered photons. Compared to the Standard mode, UHR mode reconstruction exhibits stronger noise correlation due to its superior detector spatial resolution, allowing for more aggressive spatial smoothing to achieve the desired spatial resolution in the final image.</p>","PeriodicalId":94136,"journal":{"name":"Medical physics","volume":"52 10","pages":"e70067"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medical physics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/mp.70067","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:自全身光子计数检测器CT (PCD-CT)进入临床实践以来,已经进行了广泛的物理评估,以阐明其图像质量优于能量积分检测器CT (EID-CT),并支持其临床应用。然而,其三维噪声功率谱(NPS)的评估,同时量化平面内和穿过平面的噪声纹理和大小,仍然有限。目的:通过实验评估NAEOTOM Alpha PCD-CT系统的三维NPS及其与扫描模式、重建图像类型、量子迭代重建(QIR)强度、单能量(keV)能级、螺旋节距和辐射剂量的关系。方法:在临床标准模式、临床超高分辨率(UHR)模式和专家服务模式下,对20 cm水模和30 cm PMMA模进行重复扫描。重建图像类型包括T3D、虚拟单能量图像(VMI)和T1(通过专家服务模式可获得的总能量库的线性重建)。在7个剂量水平(0.4-24 mGy)和4个螺距水平(0.35-1.5)下收集数据。在不同的QIR强度下重建T3D和VMI图像,在40 ~ 190 keV的能量范围内重建VMI图像。三维NPS NPS 3D (k x, k y, k z)$ {\mathrm{NP}}{{\mathrm{S}}_{3{\mathrm{D}}}}({{k_x},{k_y},{k_z}})$。轴向NP s2 D (k xy)$ {\mathrm{NP}}{{\mathrm{S}}_{2{\mathrm{D}}}}({{k_{xy}})$, NP s1 D (k z)$ {\mathrm{NP}}{{\mathrm{S}}_{1{\mathrm{D}}}}({{k_z})$,由NPS3D对k x ${k_x}$和k y ${k_y}$积分得到。结果:T1图像的NP s1 D (k z)$ {\mathrm{NP}}{{\mathrm{S}}_{1{\mathrm{D}}}}({{k_z}})$是平坦的,表明PCD行间无噪声相关性。相比之下,所有临床模式重建都表现出通过平面的噪声相关性,这反映在它们的NP s1 D (k z)$ {\mathrm{NP}}{{\mathrm{S}}_{1{\mathrm{D}}}}({{k_z}})$的形状。对于临床模式重建,他们的3D NPS形状显示出轻度至中度的剂量依赖性,较低剂量产生的NPS曲线在轴向和z方向上都向较低频率移动。在匹配的目标后辐射暴露下,较大的幻体比较小的幻体产生更高的噪声和更强的噪声相关性。QIR仅轻度增强了噪声相关性。对于给定的CTDIvol,螺旋螺距对3D NPS的影响可以忽略不计。由于通过平面噪声相关,T3D和VMI的方差随着切片厚度(Δ z$ \Delta z$)的减小而减小,近似为Δ z - 0.9 ${{\Delta}}{z^{- 0.9}}$,而在T1图像中观察到的缩放率为Δ z - 1.0 ${{\Delta}}{z^{- 1.0}}$。VMI的三维NPS形状与轴向频率方向的keV电平仅呈弱依赖性。与标准模式相比,UHR模式在使用软组织(Br44)核时将图像方差降低了26%,使用尖锐(Br76)核时将图像方差降低了77%。然而,3D NPS分析显示,UHR图像的通平面噪声相关性更强。结论:3D NPS为PCD-CT的噪声特性提供了新的见解:原生PCD-CT投影数据中的噪声在探测器行之间不相关,但临床重建过程在轴向和z方向上引入了噪声空间相关性,特别是在高QIR强度、低辐射剂量或较大图像对象时,增加了散射光子的百分比。与标准模式相比,UHR模式重建由于其优越的探测器空间分辨率而表现出更强的噪声相关性,允许更积极的空间平滑以在最终图像中实现所需的空间分辨率。
Three-dimensional noise characteristics of clinical photon counting detector CT.
Background: Since the introduction of whole-body photon-counting detector CT (PCD-CT) into clinical practice, extensive physics assessments have been conducted to elucidate its image quality advantages over energy-integrating detector CT (EID-CT) and to support its clinical adoption. However, evaluations of its three-dimensional (3D) noise power spectrum (NPS), which simultaneously quantifies in-plane and through-plane noise texture and magnitude, remain limited.
Purpose: To experimentally evaluate the 3D NPS of an NAEOTOM Alpha PCD-CT system and its dependence on scan mode, reconstruction image type, quantum iterative reconstruction (QIR) strength, mono-energy (keV) level, spiral pitch, and radiation dose.
Methods: Repeated scans of a 20 cm water phantom and a 30 cm PMMA phantom were conducted under the clinical Standard mode, clinical Ultra-High-Resolution (UHR) mode, and an Expert Service mode. Reconstructed image types include T3D, virtual monoenergetic image (VMI), and T1 (a linear reconstruction of total-energy bin available via the Expert Service mode). Data were collected at seven dose levels (0.4-24 mGy) and four spiral pitch levels (0.35-1.5). T3D and VMI images were reconstructed with varying QIR strengths, and VMIs were reconstructed at energies ranging from 40 to 190 keV. The 3D NPS, , was calculated from each ensemble of 3D image volumes. Axial was obtained by integrating NPS3D along , while was obtained by integrating NPS3D over and .
Results: of T1 images were flat, indicating no noise correlation across PCD rows. In contrast, all clinical-mode reconstructions exhibited through-plane noise correlation, as reflected in the shape of their . For clinical-mode reconstructions, the shape of their 3D NPS showed a mild to moderate dependence on dose, with lower doses producing NPS profiles shifted towards lower frequencies in both axial and z directions. With a matched post-object radiation exposure, the larger phantom resulted in higher noise and stronger noise correlation compared to the smaller phantom. QIR only mildly enhanced noise correlation. For a given CTDIvol, spiral pitch has a negligible impact on 3D NPS. Due to through-plane noise correlation, the variance of T3D and VMI decreases with slice thickness ( ) approximately as , in contrast to the scaling observed in T1 images. The shape of the 3D NPS of VMI showed only weak dependence on the keV level along the axial frequency direction. Compared to the Standard mode, the UHR mode reduced image variance by 26% when using a soft-tissue (Br44) kernel and by 77% with a sharp (Br76) kernel. However, 3D NPS analysis revealed stronger through-plane noise correlation in UHR images.
Conclusion: The 3D NPS provides new insight into the noise characteristics of PCD-CT: Noise in the native PCD-CT projection data is uncorrelated across detector rows, but clinical reconstruction processes introduce noise spatial correlation along both axial and z directions, particularly at higher QIR strengths, lower radiation doses, or with larger image objects that increase the percentage of scattered photons. Compared to the Standard mode, UHR mode reconstruction exhibits stronger noise correlation due to its superior detector spatial resolution, allowing for more aggressive spatial smoothing to achieve the desired spatial resolution in the final image.