调节抽脂手术中浸润与总抽吸容积比以优化手术效果。

IF 3.4 2区 医学 Q1 SURGERY
Xiang-Bin Li, Shi-Yue Cui, Chun-Yu Kang, Xi Tao, Xue-Feng Zhang, Hai-Peng Yue, Lei Yang
{"title":"调节抽脂手术中浸润与总抽吸容积比以优化手术效果。","authors":"Xiang-Bin Li, Shi-Yue Cui, Chun-Yu Kang, Xi Tao, Xue-Feng Zhang, Hai-Peng Yue, Lei Yang","doi":"10.1097/PRS.0000000000012509","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To explore the impact of varying ratio of infiltration fluid doses and the total aspirate mixture (I/A) on the outcomes of liposuction surgery.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The patients who have undergone liposuction were randomly divided into five groups, the proportion of the planned infusion dose and the total amount of aspirated mixture was 0.3-0.5, 0.5-0.8, 0.8-1.1, 1.1-1.4, 1.4-1.7, respectively. The intraoperative conditions of the five groups were recorded and the I/A was calculated, and the five groups A, B, C, D, E were finally determined according to the different proportions. The postoperative and complications of the five groups were compared, and the differences between the groups were statistically analyzed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The operation time and blood volume in liposuction bottle were closely related to I/A ratio; The number of dressing changes, length of hospital stay, and the degree of bruising, swelling, and pain in group B and C were less than those in the other groups during the hospitalization. At the same time, the I/A ratio will also affect the postoperative satisfaction of patients.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>I/A ratio in the range of 0.8-1.1 can achieve satisfactory surgical effect, and when it is about 0.9, it is the best ratio, which can provide a reference scheme for clinical practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":20128,"journal":{"name":"Plastic and reconstructive surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Modulating the infiltrate-to-total aspirate volume ratio to optimize outcomes in liposuction surgery.\",\"authors\":\"Xiang-Bin Li, Shi-Yue Cui, Chun-Yu Kang, Xi Tao, Xue-Feng Zhang, Hai-Peng Yue, Lei Yang\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/PRS.0000000000012509\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To explore the impact of varying ratio of infiltration fluid doses and the total aspirate mixture (I/A) on the outcomes of liposuction surgery.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The patients who have undergone liposuction were randomly divided into five groups, the proportion of the planned infusion dose and the total amount of aspirated mixture was 0.3-0.5, 0.5-0.8, 0.8-1.1, 1.1-1.4, 1.4-1.7, respectively. The intraoperative conditions of the five groups were recorded and the I/A was calculated, and the five groups A, B, C, D, E were finally determined according to the different proportions. The postoperative and complications of the five groups were compared, and the differences between the groups were statistically analyzed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The operation time and blood volume in liposuction bottle were closely related to I/A ratio; The number of dressing changes, length of hospital stay, and the degree of bruising, swelling, and pain in group B and C were less than those in the other groups during the hospitalization. At the same time, the I/A ratio will also affect the postoperative satisfaction of patients.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>I/A ratio in the range of 0.8-1.1 can achieve satisfactory surgical effect, and when it is about 0.9, it is the best ratio, which can provide a reference scheme for clinical practice.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20128,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Plastic and reconstructive surgery\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Plastic and reconstructive surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0000000000012509\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Plastic and reconstructive surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0000000000012509","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:探讨不同浸润液剂量比和总抽吸混合液(I/A)对吸脂手术效果的影响。方法:将已行吸脂术的患者随机分为5组,计划输注剂量与抽吸混合物总量的比例分别为0.3 ~ 0.5、0.5 ~ 0.8、0.8 ~ 1.1、1.1 ~ 1.4、1.4 ~ 1.7。记录五组患者术中情况,计算I/A,最终根据不同比例确定A、B、C、D、E五组。比较五组患者术后及并发症情况,统计分析两组间差异。结果:手术时间、吸脂瓶内血容量与I/A比密切相关;B、C组患者住院期间换药次数、住院时间、瘀伤、肿胀、疼痛程度均小于其他组。同时,I/A比值也会影响患者的术后满意度。结论:I/A比值在0.8 ~ 1.1范围内可获得满意的手术效果,约为0.9时为最佳比值,可为临床实践提供参考方案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Modulating the infiltrate-to-total aspirate volume ratio to optimize outcomes in liposuction surgery.

Objective: To explore the impact of varying ratio of infiltration fluid doses and the total aspirate mixture (I/A) on the outcomes of liposuction surgery.

Methods: The patients who have undergone liposuction were randomly divided into five groups, the proportion of the planned infusion dose and the total amount of aspirated mixture was 0.3-0.5, 0.5-0.8, 0.8-1.1, 1.1-1.4, 1.4-1.7, respectively. The intraoperative conditions of the five groups were recorded and the I/A was calculated, and the five groups A, B, C, D, E were finally determined according to the different proportions. The postoperative and complications of the five groups were compared, and the differences between the groups were statistically analyzed.

Results: The operation time and blood volume in liposuction bottle were closely related to I/A ratio; The number of dressing changes, length of hospital stay, and the degree of bruising, swelling, and pain in group B and C were less than those in the other groups during the hospitalization. At the same time, the I/A ratio will also affect the postoperative satisfaction of patients.

Conclusion: I/A ratio in the range of 0.8-1.1 can achieve satisfactory surgical effect, and when it is about 0.9, it is the best ratio, which can provide a reference scheme for clinical practice.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
13.90%
发文量
1436
审稿时长
1.5 months
期刊介绍: For more than 70 years Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery® has been the one consistently excellent reference for every specialist who uses plastic surgery techniques or works in conjunction with a plastic surgeon. Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery® , the official journal of the American Society of Plastic Surgeons, is a benefit of Society membership, and is also available on a subscription basis. Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery® brings subscribers up-to-the-minute reports on the latest techniques and follow-up for all areas of plastic and reconstructive surgery, including breast reconstruction, experimental studies, maxillofacial reconstruction, hand and microsurgery, burn repair, cosmetic surgery, as well as news on medicolegal issues. The cosmetic section provides expanded coverage on new procedures and techniques and offers more cosmetic-specific content than any other journal. All subscribers enjoy full access to the Journal''s website, which features broadcast quality videos of reconstructive and cosmetic procedures, podcasts, comprehensive article archives dating to 1946, and additional benefits offered by the newly-redesigned website.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信