Sara B A Morel, Neil Vranis, Justin Perez, Andreas Nikolis, Ashkan Ghavami, Tyler Safran
{"title":"异体脂肪基质移植的应用和适应症:系统综述。","authors":"Sara B A Morel, Neil Vranis, Justin Perez, Andreas Nikolis, Ashkan Ghavami, Tyler Safran","doi":"10.1097/PRS.0000000000012506","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Autologous fat transfer remains a staple in aesthetic and reconstructive surgery due to its regenerative capacity and tissue integration. However, limitations such as donor site morbidity and unpredictable volume retention persist. Allograft adipose matrix (AAM), a product made from human fat tissue which serves as a natural scaffold to promote adipogenesis, offers a promising alternative, serving as a scaffold for adipogenesis and delivering key extracellular matrix components. This review examines clinical applications and outcomes in soft tissue augmentation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic review was conducted via PubMed/MEDLINE/Cochrane/EMBASE using \"Allograft Adipose Matrix,\" \"Decellularized Adipose Matrix,\" \"Renuva,\" and \"Leneva.\" Studies published up to May 30, 2024, involving human or animal AAM treatment were included. Data on demographics, clinical use, injection protocols, outcomes, volume retention, and complications were extracted and analyzed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>From 352 studies, 10 involving humans and 9 involving animals were included. Human studies included 93 patients. Indications for AAM included: foot and dorsal hand rejuvenation, abdominal and buttocks contouring, temple atrophy, breast and genitalia augmentation, pressure ulcers, and facial rejuvenation. AAM injection volumes varied, with retention rates ranging from 21.5% to 100%. The most common complications were erythema, swelling, injection site pain, and burning, all resolving easily. Patient satisfaction scores ranged from 72.9% to 100%.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>AAM provides a promising biomaterial for soft tissue augmentation. Histological analysis supports its role in adipogenesis and neovascularization. Animal studies suggest enhancements through combination therapies, including AAM with autologous fat, platelet-rich plasma, or synthetic scaffolds. Further research is needed to optimize decellularization protocols, improve bioactivity and tissue incorporation.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>Level IV, review article.</p><p><strong>Important points: </strong>- Allograft Adipose Matrix is a promising alternative to autologous fat transfer, offering benefits such as regenerative support, scaffold-based adipogenesis, and reduced donor site morbidity, with various applications.- Clinical studies showed favorable outcomes, including high patient satisfaction and manageable, self-resolving complications.- Further research is needed to enhance efficacy, particularly by improving volume retention, standardizing protocols, and exploring combination therapies, as well as conducting larger, long-term clinical studies.</p>","PeriodicalId":20128,"journal":{"name":"Plastic and reconstructive surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Current Applications and Indications of Allograft Adipose Matrix: A Systematic Review.\",\"authors\":\"Sara B A Morel, Neil Vranis, Justin Perez, Andreas Nikolis, Ashkan Ghavami, Tyler Safran\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/PRS.0000000000012506\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Autologous fat transfer remains a staple in aesthetic and reconstructive surgery due to its regenerative capacity and tissue integration. However, limitations such as donor site morbidity and unpredictable volume retention persist. Allograft adipose matrix (AAM), a product made from human fat tissue which serves as a natural scaffold to promote adipogenesis, offers a promising alternative, serving as a scaffold for adipogenesis and delivering key extracellular matrix components. This review examines clinical applications and outcomes in soft tissue augmentation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic review was conducted via PubMed/MEDLINE/Cochrane/EMBASE using \\\"Allograft Adipose Matrix,\\\" \\\"Decellularized Adipose Matrix,\\\" \\\"Renuva,\\\" and \\\"Leneva.\\\" Studies published up to May 30, 2024, involving human or animal AAM treatment were included. Data on demographics, clinical use, injection protocols, outcomes, volume retention, and complications were extracted and analyzed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>From 352 studies, 10 involving humans and 9 involving animals were included. Human studies included 93 patients. Indications for AAM included: foot and dorsal hand rejuvenation, abdominal and buttocks contouring, temple atrophy, breast and genitalia augmentation, pressure ulcers, and facial rejuvenation. AAM injection volumes varied, with retention rates ranging from 21.5% to 100%. The most common complications were erythema, swelling, injection site pain, and burning, all resolving easily. Patient satisfaction scores ranged from 72.9% to 100%.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>AAM provides a promising biomaterial for soft tissue augmentation. Histological analysis supports its role in adipogenesis and neovascularization. Animal studies suggest enhancements through combination therapies, including AAM with autologous fat, platelet-rich plasma, or synthetic scaffolds. Further research is needed to optimize decellularization protocols, improve bioactivity and tissue incorporation.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>Level IV, review article.</p><p><strong>Important points: </strong>- Allograft Adipose Matrix is a promising alternative to autologous fat transfer, offering benefits such as regenerative support, scaffold-based adipogenesis, and reduced donor site morbidity, with various applications.- Clinical studies showed favorable outcomes, including high patient satisfaction and manageable, self-resolving complications.- Further research is needed to enhance efficacy, particularly by improving volume retention, standardizing protocols, and exploring combination therapies, as well as conducting larger, long-term clinical studies.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20128,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Plastic and reconstructive surgery\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Plastic and reconstructive surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0000000000012506\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Plastic and reconstructive surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0000000000012506","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Current Applications and Indications of Allograft Adipose Matrix: A Systematic Review.
Background: Autologous fat transfer remains a staple in aesthetic and reconstructive surgery due to its regenerative capacity and tissue integration. However, limitations such as donor site morbidity and unpredictable volume retention persist. Allograft adipose matrix (AAM), a product made from human fat tissue which serves as a natural scaffold to promote adipogenesis, offers a promising alternative, serving as a scaffold for adipogenesis and delivering key extracellular matrix components. This review examines clinical applications and outcomes in soft tissue augmentation.
Methods: A systematic review was conducted via PubMed/MEDLINE/Cochrane/EMBASE using "Allograft Adipose Matrix," "Decellularized Adipose Matrix," "Renuva," and "Leneva." Studies published up to May 30, 2024, involving human or animal AAM treatment were included. Data on demographics, clinical use, injection protocols, outcomes, volume retention, and complications were extracted and analyzed.
Results: From 352 studies, 10 involving humans and 9 involving animals were included. Human studies included 93 patients. Indications for AAM included: foot and dorsal hand rejuvenation, abdominal and buttocks contouring, temple atrophy, breast and genitalia augmentation, pressure ulcers, and facial rejuvenation. AAM injection volumes varied, with retention rates ranging from 21.5% to 100%. The most common complications were erythema, swelling, injection site pain, and burning, all resolving easily. Patient satisfaction scores ranged from 72.9% to 100%.
Conclusion: AAM provides a promising biomaterial for soft tissue augmentation. Histological analysis supports its role in adipogenesis and neovascularization. Animal studies suggest enhancements through combination therapies, including AAM with autologous fat, platelet-rich plasma, or synthetic scaffolds. Further research is needed to optimize decellularization protocols, improve bioactivity and tissue incorporation.
Level of evidence: Level IV, review article.
Important points: - Allograft Adipose Matrix is a promising alternative to autologous fat transfer, offering benefits such as regenerative support, scaffold-based adipogenesis, and reduced donor site morbidity, with various applications.- Clinical studies showed favorable outcomes, including high patient satisfaction and manageable, self-resolving complications.- Further research is needed to enhance efficacy, particularly by improving volume retention, standardizing protocols, and exploring combination therapies, as well as conducting larger, long-term clinical studies.
期刊介绍:
For more than 70 years Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery® has been the one consistently excellent reference for every specialist who uses plastic surgery techniques or works in conjunction with a plastic surgeon. Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery® , the official journal of the American Society of Plastic Surgeons, is a benefit of Society membership, and is also available on a subscription basis.
Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery® brings subscribers up-to-the-minute reports on the latest techniques and follow-up for all areas of plastic and reconstructive surgery, including breast reconstruction, experimental studies, maxillofacial reconstruction, hand and microsurgery, burn repair, cosmetic surgery, as well as news on medicolegal issues. The cosmetic section provides expanded coverage on new procedures and techniques and offers more cosmetic-specific content than any other journal. All subscribers enjoy full access to the Journal''s website, which features broadcast quality videos of reconstructive and cosmetic procedures, podcasts, comprehensive article archives dating to 1946, and additional benefits offered by the newly-redesigned website.