肾供体特征指数(KDPI)预测肾移植受者长期移植生存的外部验证。

IF 3 Q1 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY
Kidney360 Pub Date : 2025-10-07 DOI:10.34067/KID.0000000946
Bianca Cassão, Renato D Foresto, Maria Amélia Hazin, Ana Paula Morais, Luis Gustavo Modelli de Andrade, José Medina-Pestana, Lúcio Requião-Moura, Helio Tedesco-Silva
{"title":"肾供体特征指数(KDPI)预测肾移植受者长期移植生存的外部验证。","authors":"Bianca Cassão, Renato D Foresto, Maria Amélia Hazin, Ana Paula Morais, Luis Gustavo Modelli de Andrade, José Medina-Pestana, Lúcio Requião-Moura, Helio Tedesco-Silva","doi":"10.34067/KID.0000000946","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The Kidney Donor Profile Index (KDPI), developed in the United States, is widely used to predict graft failure after kidney transplantation. However, external validation is crucial to assess its performance in other populations. This study aimed to validate KDPI in Brazilian kidney transplant recipients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a single-center, retrospective cohort study involving 1,807 recipients of deceased-donor kidney transplants performed between January 2013 and December 2015, with a 5-year follow-up. The model's discrimination, overall fitness, and calibration were assessed in predicting graft failure.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Recipients were 49.2 years old, 60.8% were male, on hemodialysis for 40.1 months. The median KDRI and KDPI were 1.2 and 69%, respectively. The AU-ROC for graft survival was highest in the KDPI >85% category [0.576 (95%CI: 0.521-0.631)], followed by the >35-85% [0.504 (95%CI: 0.460-0.549)] and the 0-35% [0.488 (95%CI: 0.408-0.568)] categories. Discrimination improved in the Cox model incorporating recipient variables and KDPI categories [0.801 (95%CI: 0.775-0.827)]. The KDPI as a continuous variable had a C-index of 0.561 (95%CI: 0.533-0.588), similar to donor age alone [0.560 (95%CI: 0.534-0.587)]. The overall fitness assessed by the Brier score was 0.151, and the calibration plot showed a good performance for KDPI. However, it was similar to what was observed using the donor age as a predictor isolated (0.152).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In this transportability external validation study, KDPI performed acceptably as a prediction tool for 5-year graft survival after kidney transplantation. These findings guide organ allocation and support clinical decision-making regarding organ acceptance.</p>","PeriodicalId":17882,"journal":{"name":"Kidney360","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"External Validation of the Kidney Donor Profile Index (KDPI) to Predict Long-Term Graft Survival in Kidney Transplant Recipients.\",\"authors\":\"Bianca Cassão, Renato D Foresto, Maria Amélia Hazin, Ana Paula Morais, Luis Gustavo Modelli de Andrade, José Medina-Pestana, Lúcio Requião-Moura, Helio Tedesco-Silva\",\"doi\":\"10.34067/KID.0000000946\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The Kidney Donor Profile Index (KDPI), developed in the United States, is widely used to predict graft failure after kidney transplantation. However, external validation is crucial to assess its performance in other populations. This study aimed to validate KDPI in Brazilian kidney transplant recipients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a single-center, retrospective cohort study involving 1,807 recipients of deceased-donor kidney transplants performed between January 2013 and December 2015, with a 5-year follow-up. The model's discrimination, overall fitness, and calibration were assessed in predicting graft failure.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Recipients were 49.2 years old, 60.8% were male, on hemodialysis for 40.1 months. The median KDRI and KDPI were 1.2 and 69%, respectively. The AU-ROC for graft survival was highest in the KDPI >85% category [0.576 (95%CI: 0.521-0.631)], followed by the >35-85% [0.504 (95%CI: 0.460-0.549)] and the 0-35% [0.488 (95%CI: 0.408-0.568)] categories. Discrimination improved in the Cox model incorporating recipient variables and KDPI categories [0.801 (95%CI: 0.775-0.827)]. The KDPI as a continuous variable had a C-index of 0.561 (95%CI: 0.533-0.588), similar to donor age alone [0.560 (95%CI: 0.534-0.587)]. The overall fitness assessed by the Brier score was 0.151, and the calibration plot showed a good performance for KDPI. However, it was similar to what was observed using the donor age as a predictor isolated (0.152).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In this transportability external validation study, KDPI performed acceptably as a prediction tool for 5-year graft survival after kidney transplantation. These findings guide organ allocation and support clinical decision-making regarding organ acceptance.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":17882,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Kidney360\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Kidney360\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.34067/KID.0000000946\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Kidney360","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.34067/KID.0000000946","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:肾供者概况指数(KDPI)是在美国发展起来的,被广泛用于预测肾移植后移植物衰竭。然而,外部验证对于评估其在其他人群中的表现至关重要。本研究旨在验证巴西肾移植受者的KDPI。方法:我们进行了一项单中心、回顾性队列研究,纳入了2013年1月至2015年12月期间进行的1807例死亡供肾移植受者,并进行了5年随访。在预测移植物衰竭时,评估了模型的辨识度、整体适应度和校准。结果:患者年龄49.2岁,男性占60.8%,透析时间40.1个月。KDRI和KDPI的中位数分别为1.2和69%。移植物存活的AU-ROC在KDPI为> -85%的类别中最高[0.576 (95%CI: 0.521-0.631)],其次是>为35-85%的[0.504 (95%CI: 0.460-0.549)]和0-35%的[0.488 (95%CI: 0.408-0.568)]。纳入受者变量和KDPI类别的Cox模型的辨别力有所提高[0.801 (95%CI: 0.775-0.827)]。KDPI作为一个连续变量,其c指数为0.561 (95%CI: 0.533-0.588),与单独供者年龄[0.560 (95%CI: 0.534-0.587)]相似。Brier评分评估的总体适应度为0.151,校正图显示KDPI具有良好的性能。然而,它与使用供体年龄作为单独预测因子观察到的结果相似(0.152)。结论:在这项可移植性外部验证研究中,KDPI作为肾移植后5年移植物存活的预测工具是可以接受的。这些发现指导器官分配和支持有关器官接受的临床决策。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
External Validation of the Kidney Donor Profile Index (KDPI) to Predict Long-Term Graft Survival in Kidney Transplant Recipients.

Background: The Kidney Donor Profile Index (KDPI), developed in the United States, is widely used to predict graft failure after kidney transplantation. However, external validation is crucial to assess its performance in other populations. This study aimed to validate KDPI in Brazilian kidney transplant recipients.

Methods: We conducted a single-center, retrospective cohort study involving 1,807 recipients of deceased-donor kidney transplants performed between January 2013 and December 2015, with a 5-year follow-up. The model's discrimination, overall fitness, and calibration were assessed in predicting graft failure.

Results: Recipients were 49.2 years old, 60.8% were male, on hemodialysis for 40.1 months. The median KDRI and KDPI were 1.2 and 69%, respectively. The AU-ROC for graft survival was highest in the KDPI >85% category [0.576 (95%CI: 0.521-0.631)], followed by the >35-85% [0.504 (95%CI: 0.460-0.549)] and the 0-35% [0.488 (95%CI: 0.408-0.568)] categories. Discrimination improved in the Cox model incorporating recipient variables and KDPI categories [0.801 (95%CI: 0.775-0.827)]. The KDPI as a continuous variable had a C-index of 0.561 (95%CI: 0.533-0.588), similar to donor age alone [0.560 (95%CI: 0.534-0.587)]. The overall fitness assessed by the Brier score was 0.151, and the calibration plot showed a good performance for KDPI. However, it was similar to what was observed using the donor age as a predictor isolated (0.152).

Conclusions: In this transportability external validation study, KDPI performed acceptably as a prediction tool for 5-year graft survival after kidney transplantation. These findings guide organ allocation and support clinical decision-making regarding organ acceptance.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Kidney360
Kidney360 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY-
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信