利用多模态数据预测肺癌患者放疗疗效。

IF 2.2 4区 医学 Q3 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
Xiaojuan Duan, Yushun Gong, Liang Wei, Lu Chen, Xin Song, Yongqin Li
{"title":"利用多模态数据预测肺癌患者放疗疗效。","authors":"Xiaojuan Duan,&nbsp;Yushun Gong,&nbsp;Liang Wei,&nbsp;Lu Chen,&nbsp;Xin Song,&nbsp;Yongqin Li","doi":"10.1002/acm2.70277","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background and Purpose</h3>\n \n <p>Radiotherapy (RT) is a critical treatment for lung cancer; however, individual responses vary significantly. Pre-treatment prediction of RT response could guide clinical decision-making and identify patients unlikely to benefit. This study aims to predict RT response in lung cancer patients using multimodal data.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>Patients diagnosed with lung cancer and scheduled to undergo RT at a single institution between May 2022 and October 2024 were selected. Multimodal data, encompassing demographic, radiological, biological, and physiological characteristics, were collected 1 week before RT initiation. Treatment plans followed the International Commission on Radiation Units and Measurements (ICRU) Report 83 guidelines, developed using a commercial treatment planning system and delivered via a linear accelerator with 6 MV photon beams. Radiological and biological data were reassessed 4 weeks after completion of RT, with treatment response classified according to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST). The dataset was split into training (70%), validation (15%), and testing (15%) sets using a stratified random sampling approach. A back propagation neural network (BPNN) was trained on the training set, and model performance was validated on the testing set.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>A total of 120 patients were analyzed. Of these, 41 were classified as having partial response (PR), 69 as stable disease (SD), and 10 as progressive disease (PD). Significant differences were observed among the groups in 58 characteristics, including 2 demographic, 5 radiological, 1 biological, and 50 physiological. Among the 34 features analyzed for PR prediction, the maximum vertical tumor diameter achieved an AUC of 0.699 (95% CI: 0.630–0.757). In contrast, the comprehensive BPNN model incorporating all characteristics showed an AUC of 0.855 (95% CI: 0.843-0.875), with a prediction mean squared error (MSE) of 0.07. Similarly, among the 36 features analyzed for PD prediction, the zero-crossing ratio of surface electromyography signals achieved an AUC of 0.750 (95% CI: 0.648–0.841). The comprehensive model further increased AUC to 0.929 (95% CI: 0.900–0.960), with a prediction MSE of 0.01.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>Pretreatment demographic, radiological, and physiological characteristics were associated with RT response in lung cancer patients. The developed BPNN models leveraging multimodal data effectively predicted PR and PD, to guide personalized treatment strategies and to identify patients unlikely to benefit from RT.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":14989,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics","volume":"26 10","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12504048/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Response prediction of radiotherapy in lung cancer patients using multimodal data\",\"authors\":\"Xiaojuan Duan,&nbsp;Yushun Gong,&nbsp;Liang Wei,&nbsp;Lu Chen,&nbsp;Xin Song,&nbsp;Yongqin Li\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/acm2.70277\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Background and Purpose</h3>\\n \\n <p>Radiotherapy (RT) is a critical treatment for lung cancer; however, individual responses vary significantly. Pre-treatment prediction of RT response could guide clinical decision-making and identify patients unlikely to benefit. This study aims to predict RT response in lung cancer patients using multimodal data.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>Patients diagnosed with lung cancer and scheduled to undergo RT at a single institution between May 2022 and October 2024 were selected. Multimodal data, encompassing demographic, radiological, biological, and physiological characteristics, were collected 1 week before RT initiation. Treatment plans followed the International Commission on Radiation Units and Measurements (ICRU) Report 83 guidelines, developed using a commercial treatment planning system and delivered via a linear accelerator with 6 MV photon beams. Radiological and biological data were reassessed 4 weeks after completion of RT, with treatment response classified according to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST). The dataset was split into training (70%), validation (15%), and testing (15%) sets using a stratified random sampling approach. A back propagation neural network (BPNN) was trained on the training set, and model performance was validated on the testing set.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>A total of 120 patients were analyzed. Of these, 41 were classified as having partial response (PR), 69 as stable disease (SD), and 10 as progressive disease (PD). Significant differences were observed among the groups in 58 characteristics, including 2 demographic, 5 radiological, 1 biological, and 50 physiological. Among the 34 features analyzed for PR prediction, the maximum vertical tumor diameter achieved an AUC of 0.699 (95% CI: 0.630–0.757). In contrast, the comprehensive BPNN model incorporating all characteristics showed an AUC of 0.855 (95% CI: 0.843-0.875), with a prediction mean squared error (MSE) of 0.07. Similarly, among the 36 features analyzed for PD prediction, the zero-crossing ratio of surface electromyography signals achieved an AUC of 0.750 (95% CI: 0.648–0.841). The comprehensive model further increased AUC to 0.929 (95% CI: 0.900–0.960), with a prediction MSE of 0.01.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\\n \\n <p>Pretreatment demographic, radiological, and physiological characteristics were associated with RT response in lung cancer patients. The developed BPNN models leveraging multimodal data effectively predicted PR and PD, to guide personalized treatment strategies and to identify patients unlikely to benefit from RT.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14989,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics\",\"volume\":\"26 10\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12504048/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://aapm.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/acm2.70277\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://aapm.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/acm2.70277","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景与目的:放射治疗(RT)是治疗肺癌的重要手段;然而,个体的反应差异很大。治疗前预测RT反应可以指导临床决策,识别不可能受益的患者。本研究旨在利用多模式数据预测肺癌患者的放疗反应。方法:选择2022年5月至2024年10月期间在单一机构诊断为肺癌并计划接受放疗的患者。多模式数据,包括人口统计学、放射学、生物学和生理学特征,在放疗开始前1周收集。治疗计划遵循国际辐射单位和测量委员会(ICRU) 83号报告指南,使用商业治疗计划系统制定,并通过6毫伏光子束的直线加速器提供。放疗完成4周后重新评估放射学和生物学资料,根据实体肿瘤反应评价标准(RECIST)对治疗反应进行分类。使用分层随机抽样方法将数据集分为训练集(70%)、验证集(15%)和测试集(15%)。在训练集上训练反向传播神经网络(BPNN),并在测试集上验证模型的性能。结果:共分析120例患者。其中41例为部分缓解(PR), 69例为稳定疾病(SD), 10例为进展性疾病(PD)。在58个特征中观察到组间的显著差异,包括2个人口学特征、5个放射学特征、1个生物学特征和50个生理特征。在分析用于PR预测的34个特征中,最大垂直肿瘤直径的AUC为0.699 (95% CI: 0.630-0.757)。相比之下,包含所有特征的综合BPNN模型的AUC为0.855 (95% CI: 0.843-0.875),预测均方误差(MSE)为0.07。同样,在分析用于PD预测的36个特征中,表面肌电信号的零交叉比的AUC为0.750 (95% CI: 0.648-0.841)。综合模型进一步提高了AUC至0.929 (95% CI: 0.900 ~ 0.960),预测MSE为0.01。结论:肺癌患者放疗前的人口学、放射学和生理特征与放疗反应相关。开发的BPNN模型利用多模态数据有效地预测PR和PD,指导个性化治疗策略,并识别不太可能从RT中受益的患者。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Response prediction of radiotherapy in lung cancer patients using multimodal data

Response prediction of radiotherapy in lung cancer patients using multimodal data

Background and Purpose

Radiotherapy (RT) is a critical treatment for lung cancer; however, individual responses vary significantly. Pre-treatment prediction of RT response could guide clinical decision-making and identify patients unlikely to benefit. This study aims to predict RT response in lung cancer patients using multimodal data.

Methods

Patients diagnosed with lung cancer and scheduled to undergo RT at a single institution between May 2022 and October 2024 were selected. Multimodal data, encompassing demographic, radiological, biological, and physiological characteristics, were collected 1 week before RT initiation. Treatment plans followed the International Commission on Radiation Units and Measurements (ICRU) Report 83 guidelines, developed using a commercial treatment planning system and delivered via a linear accelerator with 6 MV photon beams. Radiological and biological data were reassessed 4 weeks after completion of RT, with treatment response classified according to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST). The dataset was split into training (70%), validation (15%), and testing (15%) sets using a stratified random sampling approach. A back propagation neural network (BPNN) was trained on the training set, and model performance was validated on the testing set.

Results

A total of 120 patients were analyzed. Of these, 41 were classified as having partial response (PR), 69 as stable disease (SD), and 10 as progressive disease (PD). Significant differences were observed among the groups in 58 characteristics, including 2 demographic, 5 radiological, 1 biological, and 50 physiological. Among the 34 features analyzed for PR prediction, the maximum vertical tumor diameter achieved an AUC of 0.699 (95% CI: 0.630–0.757). In contrast, the comprehensive BPNN model incorporating all characteristics showed an AUC of 0.855 (95% CI: 0.843-0.875), with a prediction mean squared error (MSE) of 0.07. Similarly, among the 36 features analyzed for PD prediction, the zero-crossing ratio of surface electromyography signals achieved an AUC of 0.750 (95% CI: 0.648–0.841). The comprehensive model further increased AUC to 0.929 (95% CI: 0.900–0.960), with a prediction MSE of 0.01.

Conclusion

Pretreatment demographic, radiological, and physiological characteristics were associated with RT response in lung cancer patients. The developed BPNN models leveraging multimodal data effectively predicted PR and PD, to guide personalized treatment strategies and to identify patients unlikely to benefit from RT.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
19.00%
发文量
331
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics is an international Open Access publication dedicated to clinical medical physics. JACMP welcomes original contributions dealing with all aspects of medical physics from scientists working in the clinical medical physics around the world. JACMP accepts only online submission. JACMP will publish: -Original Contributions: Peer-reviewed, investigations that represent new and significant contributions to the field. Recommended word count: up to 7500. -Review Articles: Reviews of major areas or sub-areas in the field of clinical medical physics. These articles may be of any length and are peer reviewed. -Technical Notes: These should be no longer than 3000 words, including key references. -Letters to the Editor: Comments on papers published in JACMP or on any other matters of interest to clinical medical physics. These should not be more than 1250 (including the literature) and their publication is only based on the decision of the editor, who occasionally asks experts on the merit of the contents. -Book Reviews: The editorial office solicits Book Reviews. -Announcements of Forthcoming Meetings: The Editor may provide notice of forthcoming meetings, course offerings, and other events relevant to clinical medical physics. -Parallel Opposed Editorial: We welcome topics relevant to clinical practice and medical physics profession. The contents can be controversial debate or opposed aspects of an issue. One author argues for the position and the other against. Each side of the debate contains an opening statement up to 800 words, followed by a rebuttal up to 500 words. Readers interested in participating in this series should contact the moderator with a proposed title and a short description of the topic
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信