Xiaojuan Duan, Yushun Gong, Liang Wei, Lu Chen, Xin Song, Yongqin Li
{"title":"利用多模态数据预测肺癌患者放疗疗效。","authors":"Xiaojuan Duan, Yushun Gong, Liang Wei, Lu Chen, Xin Song, Yongqin Li","doi":"10.1002/acm2.70277","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background and Purpose</h3>\n \n <p>Radiotherapy (RT) is a critical treatment for lung cancer; however, individual responses vary significantly. Pre-treatment prediction of RT response could guide clinical decision-making and identify patients unlikely to benefit. This study aims to predict RT response in lung cancer patients using multimodal data.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>Patients diagnosed with lung cancer and scheduled to undergo RT at a single institution between May 2022 and October 2024 were selected. Multimodal data, encompassing demographic, radiological, biological, and physiological characteristics, were collected 1 week before RT initiation. Treatment plans followed the International Commission on Radiation Units and Measurements (ICRU) Report 83 guidelines, developed using a commercial treatment planning system and delivered via a linear accelerator with 6 MV photon beams. Radiological and biological data were reassessed 4 weeks after completion of RT, with treatment response classified according to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST). The dataset was split into training (70%), validation (15%), and testing (15%) sets using a stratified random sampling approach. A back propagation neural network (BPNN) was trained on the training set, and model performance was validated on the testing set.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>A total of 120 patients were analyzed. Of these, 41 were classified as having partial response (PR), 69 as stable disease (SD), and 10 as progressive disease (PD). Significant differences were observed among the groups in 58 characteristics, including 2 demographic, 5 radiological, 1 biological, and 50 physiological. Among the 34 features analyzed for PR prediction, the maximum vertical tumor diameter achieved an AUC of 0.699 (95% CI: 0.630–0.757). In contrast, the comprehensive BPNN model incorporating all characteristics showed an AUC of 0.855 (95% CI: 0.843-0.875), with a prediction mean squared error (MSE) of 0.07. Similarly, among the 36 features analyzed for PD prediction, the zero-crossing ratio of surface electromyography signals achieved an AUC of 0.750 (95% CI: 0.648–0.841). The comprehensive model further increased AUC to 0.929 (95% CI: 0.900–0.960), with a prediction MSE of 0.01.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>Pretreatment demographic, radiological, and physiological characteristics were associated with RT response in lung cancer patients. The developed BPNN models leveraging multimodal data effectively predicted PR and PD, to guide personalized treatment strategies and to identify patients unlikely to benefit from RT.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":14989,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics","volume":"26 10","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12504048/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Response prediction of radiotherapy in lung cancer patients using multimodal data\",\"authors\":\"Xiaojuan Duan, Yushun Gong, Liang Wei, Lu Chen, Xin Song, Yongqin Li\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/acm2.70277\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Background and Purpose</h3>\\n \\n <p>Radiotherapy (RT) is a critical treatment for lung cancer; however, individual responses vary significantly. Pre-treatment prediction of RT response could guide clinical decision-making and identify patients unlikely to benefit. This study aims to predict RT response in lung cancer patients using multimodal data.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>Patients diagnosed with lung cancer and scheduled to undergo RT at a single institution between May 2022 and October 2024 were selected. Multimodal data, encompassing demographic, radiological, biological, and physiological characteristics, were collected 1 week before RT initiation. Treatment plans followed the International Commission on Radiation Units and Measurements (ICRU) Report 83 guidelines, developed using a commercial treatment planning system and delivered via a linear accelerator with 6 MV photon beams. Radiological and biological data were reassessed 4 weeks after completion of RT, with treatment response classified according to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST). The dataset was split into training (70%), validation (15%), and testing (15%) sets using a stratified random sampling approach. A back propagation neural network (BPNN) was trained on the training set, and model performance was validated on the testing set.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>A total of 120 patients were analyzed. Of these, 41 were classified as having partial response (PR), 69 as stable disease (SD), and 10 as progressive disease (PD). Significant differences were observed among the groups in 58 characteristics, including 2 demographic, 5 radiological, 1 biological, and 50 physiological. Among the 34 features analyzed for PR prediction, the maximum vertical tumor diameter achieved an AUC of 0.699 (95% CI: 0.630–0.757). In contrast, the comprehensive BPNN model incorporating all characteristics showed an AUC of 0.855 (95% CI: 0.843-0.875), with a prediction mean squared error (MSE) of 0.07. Similarly, among the 36 features analyzed for PD prediction, the zero-crossing ratio of surface electromyography signals achieved an AUC of 0.750 (95% CI: 0.648–0.841). The comprehensive model further increased AUC to 0.929 (95% CI: 0.900–0.960), with a prediction MSE of 0.01.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\\n \\n <p>Pretreatment demographic, radiological, and physiological characteristics were associated with RT response in lung cancer patients. The developed BPNN models leveraging multimodal data effectively predicted PR and PD, to guide personalized treatment strategies and to identify patients unlikely to benefit from RT.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14989,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics\",\"volume\":\"26 10\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12504048/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://aapm.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/acm2.70277\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://aapm.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/acm2.70277","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
Response prediction of radiotherapy in lung cancer patients using multimodal data
Background and Purpose
Radiotherapy (RT) is a critical treatment for lung cancer; however, individual responses vary significantly. Pre-treatment prediction of RT response could guide clinical decision-making and identify patients unlikely to benefit. This study aims to predict RT response in lung cancer patients using multimodal data.
Methods
Patients diagnosed with lung cancer and scheduled to undergo RT at a single institution between May 2022 and October 2024 were selected. Multimodal data, encompassing demographic, radiological, biological, and physiological characteristics, were collected 1 week before RT initiation. Treatment plans followed the International Commission on Radiation Units and Measurements (ICRU) Report 83 guidelines, developed using a commercial treatment planning system and delivered via a linear accelerator with 6 MV photon beams. Radiological and biological data were reassessed 4 weeks after completion of RT, with treatment response classified according to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST). The dataset was split into training (70%), validation (15%), and testing (15%) sets using a stratified random sampling approach. A back propagation neural network (BPNN) was trained on the training set, and model performance was validated on the testing set.
Results
A total of 120 patients were analyzed. Of these, 41 were classified as having partial response (PR), 69 as stable disease (SD), and 10 as progressive disease (PD). Significant differences were observed among the groups in 58 characteristics, including 2 demographic, 5 radiological, 1 biological, and 50 physiological. Among the 34 features analyzed for PR prediction, the maximum vertical tumor diameter achieved an AUC of 0.699 (95% CI: 0.630–0.757). In contrast, the comprehensive BPNN model incorporating all characteristics showed an AUC of 0.855 (95% CI: 0.843-0.875), with a prediction mean squared error (MSE) of 0.07. Similarly, among the 36 features analyzed for PD prediction, the zero-crossing ratio of surface electromyography signals achieved an AUC of 0.750 (95% CI: 0.648–0.841). The comprehensive model further increased AUC to 0.929 (95% CI: 0.900–0.960), with a prediction MSE of 0.01.
Conclusion
Pretreatment demographic, radiological, and physiological characteristics were associated with RT response in lung cancer patients. The developed BPNN models leveraging multimodal data effectively predicted PR and PD, to guide personalized treatment strategies and to identify patients unlikely to benefit from RT.
期刊介绍:
Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics is an international Open Access publication dedicated to clinical medical physics. JACMP welcomes original contributions dealing with all aspects of medical physics from scientists working in the clinical medical physics around the world. JACMP accepts only online submission.
JACMP will publish:
-Original Contributions: Peer-reviewed, investigations that represent new and significant contributions to the field. Recommended word count: up to 7500.
-Review Articles: Reviews of major areas or sub-areas in the field of clinical medical physics. These articles may be of any length and are peer reviewed.
-Technical Notes: These should be no longer than 3000 words, including key references.
-Letters to the Editor: Comments on papers published in JACMP or on any other matters of interest to clinical medical physics. These should not be more than 1250 (including the literature) and their publication is only based on the decision of the editor, who occasionally asks experts on the merit of the contents.
-Book Reviews: The editorial office solicits Book Reviews.
-Announcements of Forthcoming Meetings: The Editor may provide notice of forthcoming meetings, course offerings, and other events relevant to clinical medical physics.
-Parallel Opposed Editorial: We welcome topics relevant to clinical practice and medical physics profession. The contents can be controversial debate or opposed aspects of an issue. One author argues for the position and the other against. Each side of the debate contains an opening statement up to 800 words, followed by a rebuttal up to 500 words. Readers interested in participating in this series should contact the moderator with a proposed title and a short description of the topic