带薪病假对医疗服务的影响。

IF 2.4 3区 医学 Q2 ECONOMICS
Health economics Pub Date : 2025-10-07 DOI:10.1002/hec.70049
Xiaohui Guo, Lizhong Peng
{"title":"带薪病假对医疗服务的影响。","authors":"Xiaohui Guo, Lizhong Peng","doi":"10.1002/hec.70049","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The U.S. paid-sick-leave (PSL) mandates allow private-sector workers to take time off for their own or family members' illnesses. However, the impacts of these laws on workers' care seeking and provision activities are relatively understudied. We address this gap by exploiting cross-state variation in mandate enactment between 2012 and 2019. Using data from the American Time Use Survey, our difference-in-differences estimates show little evidence that PSL mandates affect the probability of spending time on overall care provision at the population level. However, we find a positive association between the mandates and care provided to adults by workers in industries with larger exposure to the policies. Our results provide empirical support for the potential of paid leave policies to help workers who otherwise have limited access to the benefit reconcile workplace responsibilities and caregiving.</p>","PeriodicalId":12847,"journal":{"name":"Health economics","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Effects of Paid-Sick-Leave Mandates on Care Provision.\",\"authors\":\"Xiaohui Guo, Lizhong Peng\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/hec.70049\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The U.S. paid-sick-leave (PSL) mandates allow private-sector workers to take time off for their own or family members' illnesses. However, the impacts of these laws on workers' care seeking and provision activities are relatively understudied. We address this gap by exploiting cross-state variation in mandate enactment between 2012 and 2019. Using data from the American Time Use Survey, our difference-in-differences estimates show little evidence that PSL mandates affect the probability of spending time on overall care provision at the population level. However, we find a positive association between the mandates and care provided to adults by workers in industries with larger exposure to the policies. Our results provide empirical support for the potential of paid leave policies to help workers who otherwise have limited access to the benefit reconcile workplace responsibilities and caregiving.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12847,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Health economics\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Health economics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/hec.70049\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ECONOMICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health economics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/hec.70049","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

美国的带薪病假(PSL)规定允许私营部门的员工因自己或家人生病而休假。然而,这些法律对工人寻求护理和提供活动的影响研究相对不足。我们通过利用2012年至2019年期间各州在任务制定方面的差异来解决这一差距。使用来自美国时间使用调查的数据,我们的差异中差异估计显示,在人口水平上,PSL任务影响花费时间在总体护理提供上的概率的证据很少。然而,我们发现,在受政策影响较大的行业中,授权和工人向成年人提供的照顾之间存在正相关关系。我们的研究结果为带薪休假政策的潜力提供了实证支持,以帮助那些在其他方面无法获得福利的工人协调工作场所的责任和照顾。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Effects of Paid-Sick-Leave Mandates on Care Provision.

The U.S. paid-sick-leave (PSL) mandates allow private-sector workers to take time off for their own or family members' illnesses. However, the impacts of these laws on workers' care seeking and provision activities are relatively understudied. We address this gap by exploiting cross-state variation in mandate enactment between 2012 and 2019. Using data from the American Time Use Survey, our difference-in-differences estimates show little evidence that PSL mandates affect the probability of spending time on overall care provision at the population level. However, we find a positive association between the mandates and care provided to adults by workers in industries with larger exposure to the policies. Our results provide empirical support for the potential of paid leave policies to help workers who otherwise have limited access to the benefit reconcile workplace responsibilities and caregiving.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Health economics
Health economics 医学-卫生保健
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
4.80%
发文量
177
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: This Journal publishes articles on all aspects of health economics: theoretical contributions, empirical studies and analyses of health policy from the economic perspective. Its scope includes the determinants of health and its definition and valuation, as well as the demand for and supply of health care; planning and market mechanisms; micro-economic evaluation of individual procedures and treatments; and evaluation of the performance of health care systems. Contributions should typically be original and innovative. As a rule, the Journal does not include routine applications of cost-effectiveness analysis, discrete choice experiments and costing analyses. Editorials are regular features, these should be concise and topical. Occasionally commissioned reviews are published and special issues bring together contributions on a single topic. Health Economics Letters facilitate rapid exchange of views on topical issues. Contributions related to problems in both developed and developing countries are welcome.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信