对激光碎石热安全性的再思考:热剂量阈值的系统回顾。

IF 2.2 3区 医学 Q2 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY
Felipe Pauchard, Alejandro Calvillo-Ramirez, Jose A Salvadó, Olivier Traxer, Eugenio Ventimiglia
{"title":"对激光碎石热安全性的再思考:热剂量阈值的系统回顾。","authors":"Felipe Pauchard, Alejandro Calvillo-Ramirez, Jose A Salvadó, Olivier Traxer, Eugenio Ventimiglia","doi":"10.1097/MOU.0000000000001346","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose of review: </strong>To perform a systematic review of cumulative equivalent minutes at 43 °C (CEM43) threshold considered by endourology literature to induce tissue thermal damage.</p><p><strong>Recent findings: </strong>While empirical strategies to reduce temperature have been suggested, the concept of thermal dose provides a more accurate framework to assess thermal injury, as it integrates both temperature and exposure duration.</p><p><strong>Summary: </strong>A systematic review was performed in accordance with PRISMA checklist regarding thermal dose and laser lithotripsy. Eight hundred and fifty-seven articles were identified, and 19 were considered for final analysis. All of them based the thermal dose calculation on the model by Sapareto and Dewey. The most common threshold used was CEM43 at least 120 min. However, this value has not been empirically validated for renal tissue and may significantly overestimate its thermal tolerance. Evidence suggests that renal thermal damage can occur at CEM43 values as low as 20-70 min. The thermal dose concept allows to understand the profile of temperature that might be safe. The classical thresholds proposed in endourology papers seems to be well above the actual tolerance of renal tissue. Caution should be taken with laser settings to avoid potential cell injury due to overheating during laser lithotripsy.</p>","PeriodicalId":11093,"journal":{"name":"Current Opinion in Urology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Rethinking thermal safety in laser lithotripsy: a systematic review of thermal dose thresholds.\",\"authors\":\"Felipe Pauchard, Alejandro Calvillo-Ramirez, Jose A Salvadó, Olivier Traxer, Eugenio Ventimiglia\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/MOU.0000000000001346\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose of review: </strong>To perform a systematic review of cumulative equivalent minutes at 43 °C (CEM43) threshold considered by endourology literature to induce tissue thermal damage.</p><p><strong>Recent findings: </strong>While empirical strategies to reduce temperature have been suggested, the concept of thermal dose provides a more accurate framework to assess thermal injury, as it integrates both temperature and exposure duration.</p><p><strong>Summary: </strong>A systematic review was performed in accordance with PRISMA checklist regarding thermal dose and laser lithotripsy. Eight hundred and fifty-seven articles were identified, and 19 were considered for final analysis. All of them based the thermal dose calculation on the model by Sapareto and Dewey. The most common threshold used was CEM43 at least 120 min. However, this value has not been empirically validated for renal tissue and may significantly overestimate its thermal tolerance. Evidence suggests that renal thermal damage can occur at CEM43 values as low as 20-70 min. The thermal dose concept allows to understand the profile of temperature that might be safe. The classical thresholds proposed in endourology papers seems to be well above the actual tolerance of renal tissue. Caution should be taken with laser settings to avoid potential cell injury due to overheating during laser lithotripsy.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11093,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Current Opinion in Urology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Current Opinion in Urology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/MOU.0000000000001346\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Opinion in Urology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/MOU.0000000000001346","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

综述的目的:对内分泌学文献认为的43°C (CEM43)阈值下的累积等效分钟进行系统综述,以诱导组织热损伤。最近的研究发现:虽然已经提出了降低温度的经验策略,但热剂量的概念提供了一个更准确的框架来评估热损伤,因为它整合了温度和暴露时间。摘要:根据PRISMA检查表对热剂量和激光碎石进行了系统的评价。确定了857篇文章,其中19篇被考虑进行最终分析。所有的热剂量计算都基于Sapareto和Dewey的模型。最常用的阈值是CEM43至少120分钟。然而,这一数值尚未得到肾组织的经验验证,可能会严重高估其热耐受性。有证据表明,在CEM43值低至20-70分钟时,肾脏就会发生热损伤。热剂量的概念可以让我们了解可能安全的温度分布。在内分泌学论文中提出的经典阈值似乎远远高于肾组织的实际耐受性。应注意激光设置,以避免在激光碎石过程中因过热而潜在的细胞损伤。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Rethinking thermal safety in laser lithotripsy: a systematic review of thermal dose thresholds.

Purpose of review: To perform a systematic review of cumulative equivalent minutes at 43 °C (CEM43) threshold considered by endourology literature to induce tissue thermal damage.

Recent findings: While empirical strategies to reduce temperature have been suggested, the concept of thermal dose provides a more accurate framework to assess thermal injury, as it integrates both temperature and exposure duration.

Summary: A systematic review was performed in accordance with PRISMA checklist regarding thermal dose and laser lithotripsy. Eight hundred and fifty-seven articles were identified, and 19 were considered for final analysis. All of them based the thermal dose calculation on the model by Sapareto and Dewey. The most common threshold used was CEM43 at least 120 min. However, this value has not been empirically validated for renal tissue and may significantly overestimate its thermal tolerance. Evidence suggests that renal thermal damage can occur at CEM43 values as low as 20-70 min. The thermal dose concept allows to understand the profile of temperature that might be safe. The classical thresholds proposed in endourology papers seems to be well above the actual tolerance of renal tissue. Caution should be taken with laser settings to avoid potential cell injury due to overheating during laser lithotripsy.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Current Opinion in Urology
Current Opinion in Urology 医学-泌尿学与肾脏学
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
4.00%
发文量
140
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: ​​​​​​​​Current Opinion in Urology delivers a broad-based perspective on the most recent and most exciting developments in urology from across the world. Published bimonthly and featuring ten key topics – including focuses on prostate cancer, bladder cancer and minimally invasive urology – the journal’s renowned team of guest editors ensure a balanced, expert assessment of the recently published literature in each respective field with insightful editorials and on-the-mark invited reviews.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信