{"title":"通路水平的突变特征预测乳腺癌结果并揭示治疗靶点。","authors":"Máté Posta, Balázs Győrffy","doi":"10.1111/bph.70215","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and purpose: </strong>In order to significantly improve the therapeutic treatment of breast cancer, the exploration of underlying genetic and molecular differences is absolutely necessary. Here, our goal was to integrate mutational status of entire pathways to reveal molecular pathway interactions determining survival.</p><p><strong>Experimental approach: </strong>A comprehensive analysis of breast cancer mutations was conducted by integrating data from three distinct databases with a total of 4586 samples encompassing over 25,000 genes. For each gene, we filtered mutations that disruptively affect the protein structure. Cox proportional hazard regression was employed to link altered pathways to outcome. We also identified the co-occurring and mutually exclusive disruptive mutations.</p><p><strong>Key results: </strong>We identified 17 genes, the mutation status of which alone seriously affects relapse-free survival. The three most significant genes were TP53 (HR: 2.04, p: 4.65 × 10<sup>-33</sup>), CARD11 (HR: 2.59, p: 1.54 × 10<sup>-5</sup>) and PIK3R1 (HR: 2.27, p: 3.66 × 10<sup>-5</sup>). The five most significant biological processes and KEGG pathways affecting relapse-free survival include negative regulation of cell population proliferation, positive regulation of DNA-templated transcription, protein stabilisation, and MicroRNAs in cancer, hepatocellular carcinoma, and breast cancer. Co-mutation and mutual exclusivity analysis identified significant enrichment in 241 gene pairs. Finally, we also established an online platform to enable future analysis of the established cohort for any selected pathway.</p><p><strong>Conclusions and implications: </strong>We assembled a comprehensive database of breast cancer samples and used this cohort to identify cancer-specific disruptive mutation signatures linked to altered survival outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":9262,"journal":{"name":"British Journal of Pharmacology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":7.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Pathway-level mutational signatures predict breast cancer outcomes and reveal therapeutic targets.\",\"authors\":\"Máté Posta, Balázs Győrffy\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/bph.70215\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background and purpose: </strong>In order to significantly improve the therapeutic treatment of breast cancer, the exploration of underlying genetic and molecular differences is absolutely necessary. Here, our goal was to integrate mutational status of entire pathways to reveal molecular pathway interactions determining survival.</p><p><strong>Experimental approach: </strong>A comprehensive analysis of breast cancer mutations was conducted by integrating data from three distinct databases with a total of 4586 samples encompassing over 25,000 genes. For each gene, we filtered mutations that disruptively affect the protein structure. Cox proportional hazard regression was employed to link altered pathways to outcome. We also identified the co-occurring and mutually exclusive disruptive mutations.</p><p><strong>Key results: </strong>We identified 17 genes, the mutation status of which alone seriously affects relapse-free survival. The three most significant genes were TP53 (HR: 2.04, p: 4.65 × 10<sup>-33</sup>), CARD11 (HR: 2.59, p: 1.54 × 10<sup>-5</sup>) and PIK3R1 (HR: 2.27, p: 3.66 × 10<sup>-5</sup>). The five most significant biological processes and KEGG pathways affecting relapse-free survival include negative regulation of cell population proliferation, positive regulation of DNA-templated transcription, protein stabilisation, and MicroRNAs in cancer, hepatocellular carcinoma, and breast cancer. Co-mutation and mutual exclusivity analysis identified significant enrichment in 241 gene pairs. Finally, we also established an online platform to enable future analysis of the established cohort for any selected pathway.</p><p><strong>Conclusions and implications: </strong>We assembled a comprehensive database of breast cancer samples and used this cohort to identify cancer-specific disruptive mutation signatures linked to altered survival outcomes.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9262,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"British Journal of Pharmacology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":7.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"British Journal of Pharmacology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/bph.70215\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British Journal of Pharmacology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/bph.70215","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Pathway-level mutational signatures predict breast cancer outcomes and reveal therapeutic targets.
Background and purpose: In order to significantly improve the therapeutic treatment of breast cancer, the exploration of underlying genetic and molecular differences is absolutely necessary. Here, our goal was to integrate mutational status of entire pathways to reveal molecular pathway interactions determining survival.
Experimental approach: A comprehensive analysis of breast cancer mutations was conducted by integrating data from three distinct databases with a total of 4586 samples encompassing over 25,000 genes. For each gene, we filtered mutations that disruptively affect the protein structure. Cox proportional hazard regression was employed to link altered pathways to outcome. We also identified the co-occurring and mutually exclusive disruptive mutations.
Key results: We identified 17 genes, the mutation status of which alone seriously affects relapse-free survival. The three most significant genes were TP53 (HR: 2.04, p: 4.65 × 10-33), CARD11 (HR: 2.59, p: 1.54 × 10-5) and PIK3R1 (HR: 2.27, p: 3.66 × 10-5). The five most significant biological processes and KEGG pathways affecting relapse-free survival include negative regulation of cell population proliferation, positive regulation of DNA-templated transcription, protein stabilisation, and MicroRNAs in cancer, hepatocellular carcinoma, and breast cancer. Co-mutation and mutual exclusivity analysis identified significant enrichment in 241 gene pairs. Finally, we also established an online platform to enable future analysis of the established cohort for any selected pathway.
Conclusions and implications: We assembled a comprehensive database of breast cancer samples and used this cohort to identify cancer-specific disruptive mutation signatures linked to altered survival outcomes.
期刊介绍:
The British Journal of Pharmacology (BJP) is a biomedical science journal offering comprehensive international coverage of experimental and translational pharmacology. It publishes original research, authoritative reviews, mini reviews, systematic reviews, meta-analyses, databases, letters to the Editor, and commentaries.
Review articles, databases, systematic reviews, and meta-analyses are typically commissioned, but unsolicited contributions are also considered, either as standalone papers or part of themed issues.
In addition to basic science research, BJP features translational pharmacology research, including proof-of-concept and early mechanistic studies in humans. While it generally does not publish first-in-man phase I studies or phase IIb, III, or IV studies, exceptions may be made under certain circumstances, particularly if results are combined with preclinical studies.