在考虑乳房重建的乳腺癌患者中使用决策辅助工具进行共同决策:日本一项集群随机对照试验的研究方案

IF 2.3 3区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Yoshihiro Sowa, Wakako Osaka, Itaru Tsuge, Takako Komiya, Miho Saiga, Mifue Taminato, Naomi Nagura, Tomohiro Shiraishi, Hirohito Seki, Yuki Otsuki, Yuki Matsuoka, Shoichi Tomita, Shinsuke Akita, Hiroshi Fujimoto, Kazuhiro Otani, Kotaro Yoshimura
{"title":"在考虑乳房重建的乳腺癌患者中使用决策辅助工具进行共同决策:日本一项集群随机对照试验的研究方案","authors":"Yoshihiro Sowa, Wakako Osaka, Itaru Tsuge, Takako Komiya, Miho Saiga, Mifue Taminato, Naomi Nagura, Tomohiro Shiraishi, Hirohito Seki, Yuki Otsuki, Yuki Matsuoka, Shoichi Tomita, Shinsuke Akita, Hiroshi Fujimoto, Kazuhiro Otani, Kotaro Yoshimura","doi":"10.1136/bmjopen-2024-094553","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Shared decision-making (SDM) requires that individuals are correctly and smoothly supported to make decisions. However, in Japan, development of decision aids (DAs) to support implementation of SDM is lagging behind Western countries, and there are few reports focused on breast reconstruction. Thus, it is unclear if SDM using a DA in the context of the unique national character and medical culture in Japan is useful in decision-making for breast reconstruction, including whether or not to undergo reconstruction. The aim of this multicentre collaborative study is to investigate the clinical effectiveness of SDM using a DA for patients with breast cancer considering reconstruction, from the perspectives of decisional conflict and postoperative quality of life.</p><p><strong>Methods and analysis: </strong>A multisite trial will be conducted at 12 facilities certified by the Japanese Society of Breast Oncoplastic Surgery. A cluster-randomised controlled trial is planned at centres that have implemented SDM with DAs and those that have not implemented SDM, but use a conventional surgical explanation and informed consent to make decisions about reconstruction methods. The study participants will be female patients aged ≥20 years with newly diagnosed stage 0-III breast cancer who are interested in breast reconstruction. Data collection includes baseline and follow-up patient surveys and medical record review. The effectiveness of the DA at reducing conflict and regret in decision-making (primary outcome) will be evaluated using the decision conflict scale.</p><p><strong>Ethics and dissemination: </strong>This protocol has been approved by the Kyoto University Central Institutional Review Board, and permission for performance of the study has been obtained from the Ethics Review Board at each participating centre. We plan to disseminate the findings through journal publications and national meetings, including a presentation of the research results at the Japanese Society of Breast Oncoplastic Surgery. Our findings will advance the science of medical decision-making and have the potential to reduce socioeconomic health disparities.</p><p><strong>Trial registration number: </strong>UMIN000052161.</p>","PeriodicalId":9158,"journal":{"name":"BMJ Open","volume":"15 10","pages":"e094553"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Shared decision-making using a decision aid for patients with breast cancer considering breast reconstruction: study protocol for a cluster-randomised controlled trial in Japan.\",\"authors\":\"Yoshihiro Sowa, Wakako Osaka, Itaru Tsuge, Takako Komiya, Miho Saiga, Mifue Taminato, Naomi Nagura, Tomohiro Shiraishi, Hirohito Seki, Yuki Otsuki, Yuki Matsuoka, Shoichi Tomita, Shinsuke Akita, Hiroshi Fujimoto, Kazuhiro Otani, Kotaro Yoshimura\",\"doi\":\"10.1136/bmjopen-2024-094553\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Shared decision-making (SDM) requires that individuals are correctly and smoothly supported to make decisions. However, in Japan, development of decision aids (DAs) to support implementation of SDM is lagging behind Western countries, and there are few reports focused on breast reconstruction. Thus, it is unclear if SDM using a DA in the context of the unique national character and medical culture in Japan is useful in decision-making for breast reconstruction, including whether or not to undergo reconstruction. The aim of this multicentre collaborative study is to investigate the clinical effectiveness of SDM using a DA for patients with breast cancer considering reconstruction, from the perspectives of decisional conflict and postoperative quality of life.</p><p><strong>Methods and analysis: </strong>A multisite trial will be conducted at 12 facilities certified by the Japanese Society of Breast Oncoplastic Surgery. A cluster-randomised controlled trial is planned at centres that have implemented SDM with DAs and those that have not implemented SDM, but use a conventional surgical explanation and informed consent to make decisions about reconstruction methods. The study participants will be female patients aged ≥20 years with newly diagnosed stage 0-III breast cancer who are interested in breast reconstruction. Data collection includes baseline and follow-up patient surveys and medical record review. The effectiveness of the DA at reducing conflict and regret in decision-making (primary outcome) will be evaluated using the decision conflict scale.</p><p><strong>Ethics and dissemination: </strong>This protocol has been approved by the Kyoto University Central Institutional Review Board, and permission for performance of the study has been obtained from the Ethics Review Board at each participating centre. We plan to disseminate the findings through journal publications and national meetings, including a presentation of the research results at the Japanese Society of Breast Oncoplastic Surgery. Our findings will advance the science of medical decision-making and have the potential to reduce socioeconomic health disparities.</p><p><strong>Trial registration number: </strong>UMIN000052161.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9158,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BMJ Open\",\"volume\":\"15 10\",\"pages\":\"e094553\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BMJ Open\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2024-094553\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMJ Open","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2024-094553","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

简介:共享决策(SDM)要求个体在决策过程中得到正确、顺畅的支持。然而,在日本,支持SDM实施的决策辅助(DAs)的发展落后于西方国家,并且很少有关于乳房重建的报道。因此,目前尚不清楚在日本独特的民族特征和医学文化背景下使用DA的SDM是否有助于乳房重建的决策,包括是否进行重建。本多中心合作研究的目的是从决策冲突和术后生活质量的角度,探讨采用DA的SDM对考虑重建的乳腺癌患者的临床疗效。方法和分析:一项多地点试验将在日本乳腺癌整形外科学会认证的12个机构进行。计划在已实施SDM与DAs的中心和未实施SDM的中心进行一项集群随机对照试验,但使用传统的手术解释和知情同意来决定重建方法。研究对象为年龄≥20岁、新诊断为0-III期乳腺癌且对乳房重建感兴趣的女性患者。数据收集包括基线和随访患者调查以及医疗记录审查。使用决策冲突量表评估数据分析在减少决策冲突和后悔(主要结果)方面的有效性。伦理与传播:本方案已获得京都大学中央机构审查委员会的批准,并已获得各参与中心伦理审查委员会的许可进行研究。我们计划通过期刊出版物和全国性会议来传播这些发现,包括在日本乳腺癌整形外科学会上发表研究结果。我们的研究结果将推动医疗决策科学的发展,并有可能减少社会经济健康差距。试验注册号:UMIN000052161。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Shared decision-making using a decision aid for patients with breast cancer considering breast reconstruction: study protocol for a cluster-randomised controlled trial in Japan.

Introduction: Shared decision-making (SDM) requires that individuals are correctly and smoothly supported to make decisions. However, in Japan, development of decision aids (DAs) to support implementation of SDM is lagging behind Western countries, and there are few reports focused on breast reconstruction. Thus, it is unclear if SDM using a DA in the context of the unique national character and medical culture in Japan is useful in decision-making for breast reconstruction, including whether or not to undergo reconstruction. The aim of this multicentre collaborative study is to investigate the clinical effectiveness of SDM using a DA for patients with breast cancer considering reconstruction, from the perspectives of decisional conflict and postoperative quality of life.

Methods and analysis: A multisite trial will be conducted at 12 facilities certified by the Japanese Society of Breast Oncoplastic Surgery. A cluster-randomised controlled trial is planned at centres that have implemented SDM with DAs and those that have not implemented SDM, but use a conventional surgical explanation and informed consent to make decisions about reconstruction methods. The study participants will be female patients aged ≥20 years with newly diagnosed stage 0-III breast cancer who are interested in breast reconstruction. Data collection includes baseline and follow-up patient surveys and medical record review. The effectiveness of the DA at reducing conflict and regret in decision-making (primary outcome) will be evaluated using the decision conflict scale.

Ethics and dissemination: This protocol has been approved by the Kyoto University Central Institutional Review Board, and permission for performance of the study has been obtained from the Ethics Review Board at each participating centre. We plan to disseminate the findings through journal publications and national meetings, including a presentation of the research results at the Japanese Society of Breast Oncoplastic Surgery. Our findings will advance the science of medical decision-making and have the potential to reduce socioeconomic health disparities.

Trial registration number: UMIN000052161.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
BMJ Open
BMJ Open MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
3.40%
发文量
4510
审稿时长
2-3 weeks
期刊介绍: BMJ Open is an online, open access journal, dedicated to publishing medical research from all disciplines and therapeutic areas. The journal publishes all research study types, from study protocols to phase I trials to meta-analyses, including small or specialist studies. Publishing procedures are built around fully open peer review and continuous publication, publishing research online as soon as the article is ready.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信