洪水风险敏感型土地利用治理:以加纳阿克拉为例解释执法缺口

IF 3.9 3区 社会学 Q2 ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES
Sylvia Kruse, Julio César Millán Espinosa, Fafali R. Ziga-Abortta, Martin Oteng-Ababio
{"title":"洪水风险敏感型土地利用治理:以加纳阿克拉为例解释执法缺口","authors":"Sylvia Kruse,&nbsp;Julio César Millán Espinosa,&nbsp;Fafali R. Ziga-Abortta,&nbsp;Martin Oteng-Ababio","doi":"10.1002/eet.70005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Research has shown that effective flood risk management is closely connected to land use governance, i.e., the land use system involving diverse, relevant stakeholders (e.g., landowners, public authorities, disaster management organisations) and their formal and informal land development practices. Our research scrutinises the often-observed enforcement gaps emerging when unauthorised encroachment in flood-prone areas occurs despite existing formal regulations on building activities. The study identifies factors that help explain these enforcement gaps in flood risk-sensitive land use governance by applying an institutional analysis and development (IAD) framework and a property rights perspective. Our empirical research focuses on Accra, Ghana, which has a long history of both regular and extreme flood events and is experiencing significant growth and high in-migration rates, leading to increased demand for land. This, paired with land litigation and limited security of tenure, has led to unplanned settlements and encroachments of flood-prone areas, thus heightening the local population's vulnerability—conditions typical of many similar cases in Sub-Saharan Africa. The research builds on analysing policy documents and interviews with diverse stakeholders related to flood risk management and land use governance in Accra. Applying qualitative content analysis, we identified explanatory factors in connection with the enforcement gaps, which include overlapping property rights, outpaced planning efforts, land conflicts, legal loopholes, authority mismatch, information gaps, political influence and selective enforcement, and socio-economic pressures.</p>","PeriodicalId":47396,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Policy and Governance","volume":"35 5","pages":"852-867"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/eet.70005","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Flood Risk-Sensitive Land Use Governance: Explaining Enforcement Gaps in the Case of Accra, Ghana\",\"authors\":\"Sylvia Kruse,&nbsp;Julio César Millán Espinosa,&nbsp;Fafali R. Ziga-Abortta,&nbsp;Martin Oteng-Ababio\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/eet.70005\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Research has shown that effective flood risk management is closely connected to land use governance, i.e., the land use system involving diverse, relevant stakeholders (e.g., landowners, public authorities, disaster management organisations) and their formal and informal land development practices. Our research scrutinises the often-observed enforcement gaps emerging when unauthorised encroachment in flood-prone areas occurs despite existing formal regulations on building activities. The study identifies factors that help explain these enforcement gaps in flood risk-sensitive land use governance by applying an institutional analysis and development (IAD) framework and a property rights perspective. Our empirical research focuses on Accra, Ghana, which has a long history of both regular and extreme flood events and is experiencing significant growth and high in-migration rates, leading to increased demand for land. This, paired with land litigation and limited security of tenure, has led to unplanned settlements and encroachments of flood-prone areas, thus heightening the local population's vulnerability—conditions typical of many similar cases in Sub-Saharan Africa. The research builds on analysing policy documents and interviews with diverse stakeholders related to flood risk management and land use governance in Accra. Applying qualitative content analysis, we identified explanatory factors in connection with the enforcement gaps, which include overlapping property rights, outpaced planning efforts, land conflicts, legal loopholes, authority mismatch, information gaps, political influence and selective enforcement, and socio-economic pressures.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47396,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Environmental Policy and Governance\",\"volume\":\"35 5\",\"pages\":\"852-867\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/eet.70005\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Environmental Policy and Governance\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/eet.70005\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental Policy and Governance","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/eet.70005","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

研究表明,有效的洪水风险管理与土地使用治理密切相关,即涉及各种相关利益相关者(如土地所有者、公共当局、灾害管理组织)及其正式和非正式土地开发实践的土地使用系统。我们的研究检视了在易受水浸地区发生违例侵犯时,尽管有有关建筑活动的现行正式规例,但执法方面的漏洞经常出现。该研究通过应用制度分析与发展框架和产权观点,确定了有助于解释洪水风险敏感型土地利用治理中这些执法差距的因素。我们的实证研究主要集中在加纳的阿克拉,这里有长期的常规和极端洪水事件,并且正在经历显著的增长和高移民率,导致对土地的需求增加。这种情况,再加上土地诉讼和有限的使用权保障,导致了无计划的定居点和洪水易发地区的侵占,从而加剧了当地人口的脆弱性——这是撒哈拉以南非洲许多类似案例的典型情况。这项研究建立在对政策文件的分析和对阿克拉洪水风险管理和土地利用治理相关的不同利益攸关方的访谈的基础上。通过定性内容分析,我们确定了与执法差距相关的解释因素,包括产权重叠、规划工作滞后、土地冲突、法律漏洞、权力不匹配、信息差距、政治影响和选择性执法,以及社会经济压力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Flood Risk-Sensitive Land Use Governance: Explaining Enforcement Gaps in the Case of Accra, Ghana

Flood Risk-Sensitive Land Use Governance: Explaining Enforcement Gaps in the Case of Accra, Ghana

Research has shown that effective flood risk management is closely connected to land use governance, i.e., the land use system involving diverse, relevant stakeholders (e.g., landowners, public authorities, disaster management organisations) and their formal and informal land development practices. Our research scrutinises the often-observed enforcement gaps emerging when unauthorised encroachment in flood-prone areas occurs despite existing formal regulations on building activities. The study identifies factors that help explain these enforcement gaps in flood risk-sensitive land use governance by applying an institutional analysis and development (IAD) framework and a property rights perspective. Our empirical research focuses on Accra, Ghana, which has a long history of both regular and extreme flood events and is experiencing significant growth and high in-migration rates, leading to increased demand for land. This, paired with land litigation and limited security of tenure, has led to unplanned settlements and encroachments of flood-prone areas, thus heightening the local population's vulnerability—conditions typical of many similar cases in Sub-Saharan Africa. The research builds on analysing policy documents and interviews with diverse stakeholders related to flood risk management and land use governance in Accra. Applying qualitative content analysis, we identified explanatory factors in connection with the enforcement gaps, which include overlapping property rights, outpaced planning efforts, land conflicts, legal loopholes, authority mismatch, information gaps, political influence and selective enforcement, and socio-economic pressures.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Environmental Policy and Governance
Environmental Policy and Governance ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES-
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
13.30%
发文量
67
期刊介绍: Environmental Policy and Governance is an international, inter-disciplinary journal affiliated with the European Society for Ecological Economics (ESEE). The journal seeks to advance interdisciplinary environmental research and its use to support novel solutions in environmental policy and governance. The journal publishes innovative, high quality articles which examine, or are relevant to, the environmental policies that are introduced by governments or the diverse forms of environmental governance that emerge in markets and civil society. The journal includes papers that examine how different forms of policy and governance emerge and exert influence at scales ranging from local to global and in diverse developmental and environmental contexts.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信