5.8 mm典型小口径枪械等效仿真模型评价

IF 0.9 4区 工程技术 Q4 MECHANICS
Xiaoyun Zhang, Cheng Xu
{"title":"5.8 mm典型小口径枪械等效仿真模型评价","authors":"Xiaoyun Zhang,&nbsp;Cheng Xu","doi":"10.1134/S0025654425601004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>This paper established three simulation models of the typical 5.8 mm small caliber firearm and evaluated the validity of the model. The three models adopted different geometric models and loading methods. Experimental verification is conducted for the numerical models. The muzzle velocity of the bullet, vibration of barrel, posture of the bullet of the experiment and simulation were compared and analyzed. And the accuracy of the models is evaluated. The calculation results of the three models were evaluated which included velocity of bullet, relative swing angle of bullet, simulation calculation time and pressure of barrel inner wall. The results indicated that these three models could be used in different scenarios as required. When only the motion of the bullet in the chamber is studied, the analysis can be carried out using Model no. 1 with simple barrel and load method, which has a shorter computational time. Model no. 2 takes into account the actual effect of propellant gas pressure in the barrel and is suitable for the study of the inner wall of the barrel. Model no. 3 is the closest to the actual gun situation and is suitable for considering the study of gun system. Combined with the calculation time and simulation results, the three models can have different application scenarios.</p>","PeriodicalId":697,"journal":{"name":"Mechanics of Solids","volume":"60 4","pages":"3168 - 3180"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluation of Equivalent Simulation Models for 5.8 mm Typical Small-Caliber Firearm\",\"authors\":\"Xiaoyun Zhang,&nbsp;Cheng Xu\",\"doi\":\"10.1134/S0025654425601004\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>This paper established three simulation models of the typical 5.8 mm small caliber firearm and evaluated the validity of the model. The three models adopted different geometric models and loading methods. Experimental verification is conducted for the numerical models. The muzzle velocity of the bullet, vibration of barrel, posture of the bullet of the experiment and simulation were compared and analyzed. And the accuracy of the models is evaluated. The calculation results of the three models were evaluated which included velocity of bullet, relative swing angle of bullet, simulation calculation time and pressure of barrel inner wall. The results indicated that these three models could be used in different scenarios as required. When only the motion of the bullet in the chamber is studied, the analysis can be carried out using Model no. 1 with simple barrel and load method, which has a shorter computational time. Model no. 2 takes into account the actual effect of propellant gas pressure in the barrel and is suitable for the study of the inner wall of the barrel. Model no. 3 is the closest to the actual gun situation and is suitable for considering the study of gun system. Combined with the calculation time and simulation results, the three models can have different application scenarios.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":697,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Mechanics of Solids\",\"volume\":\"60 4\",\"pages\":\"3168 - 3180\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Mechanics of Solids\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1134/S0025654425601004\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"MECHANICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Mechanics of Solids","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1134/S0025654425601004","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MECHANICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

建立了典型5.8 mm小口径枪械的三种仿真模型,并对模型的有效性进行了评价。三种模型采用了不同的几何模型和加载方法。对数值模型进行了实验验证。对实验和仿真的子弹初速、枪管振动、子弹姿态进行了对比分析。并对模型的精度进行了评价。对三种模型的计算结果进行了评价,包括弹丸速度、弹丸相对摆角、仿真计算时间和枪管内壁压力。结果表明,这三种模型可以根据需要在不同的场景中使用。当只研究子弹在枪膛内的运动时,可以使用第2号模型进行分析。1 .采用简单的筒装法,计算时间较短。模型没有。2 .考虑了药管内推进剂气体压力的实际影响,适用于药管内壁的研究。模型没有。3是最接近火炮实际情况的,适合考虑火炮系统的研究。结合计算时间和仿真结果,三种模型可以有不同的应用场景。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Evaluation of Equivalent Simulation Models for 5.8 mm Typical Small-Caliber Firearm

Evaluation of Equivalent Simulation Models for 5.8 mm Typical Small-Caliber Firearm

This paper established three simulation models of the typical 5.8 mm small caliber firearm and evaluated the validity of the model. The three models adopted different geometric models and loading methods. Experimental verification is conducted for the numerical models. The muzzle velocity of the bullet, vibration of barrel, posture of the bullet of the experiment and simulation were compared and analyzed. And the accuracy of the models is evaluated. The calculation results of the three models were evaluated which included velocity of bullet, relative swing angle of bullet, simulation calculation time and pressure of barrel inner wall. The results indicated that these three models could be used in different scenarios as required. When only the motion of the bullet in the chamber is studied, the analysis can be carried out using Model no. 1 with simple barrel and load method, which has a shorter computational time. Model no. 2 takes into account the actual effect of propellant gas pressure in the barrel and is suitable for the study of the inner wall of the barrel. Model no. 3 is the closest to the actual gun situation and is suitable for considering the study of gun system. Combined with the calculation time and simulation results, the three models can have different application scenarios.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Mechanics of Solids
Mechanics of Solids 医学-力学
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
42.90%
发文量
112
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Mechanics of Solids publishes articles in the general areas of dynamics of particles and rigid bodies and the mechanics of deformable solids. The journal has a goal of being a comprehensive record of up-to-the-minute research results. The journal coverage is vibration of discrete and continuous systems; stability and optimization of mechanical systems; automatic control theory; dynamics of multiple body systems; elasticity, viscoelasticity and plasticity; mechanics of composite materials; theory of structures and structural stability; wave propagation and impact of solids; fracture mechanics; micromechanics of solids; mechanics of granular and geological materials; structure-fluid interaction; mechanical behavior of materials; gyroscopes and navigation systems; and nanomechanics. Most of the articles in the journal are theoretical and analytical. They present a blend of basic mechanics theory with analysis of contemporary technological problems.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信