Taylor B Harrison,Jessica A Sinclair,Lisa J Martin,Kristin Childers-Buschle,Holly Elder,Sunyang Fu,Hongfang Liu,William B Brinkman,Melanie F Myers,Michelle L McGowan
{"title":"代表性就是力量:一项涉及青少年的非随机临床试验的传统、混合和数字招募结果。","authors":"Taylor B Harrison,Jessica A Sinclair,Lisa J Martin,Kristin Childers-Buschle,Holly Elder,Sunyang Fu,Hongfang Liu,William B Brinkman,Melanie F Myers,Michelle L McGowan","doi":"10.1038/s41746-025-01947-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Clinical trials support the iterative advancement of modern medicine. However, challenges in achieving population-representativeness or participant sampling commensurate with the burden of disease can limit the generalizability and reproducibility of trial results. Here, we present the recruitment strategies and cohort profile of the Engaging Adolescents in Decisions about Return of Genomic Research Results non-randomized clinical trial (NCT0448106), where traditional, targeted hybrid, and digital recruitment methods were implemented with quota sampling to enroll diverse adolescents (ages 13-17) and young adults (ages 18-21). The largest proportion of participants enrolled through digital strategies (39.1%), followed by traditional (34.2%), and targeted hybrid strategies (23.2%). Despite lower enrollment, targeted hybrid recruitment, involving letters and text messages, had the largest proportion of participants from groups historically underrepresented in research (87.5%), compared to traditional (48.5%) and digital (32.3%) methods (p < 0.001). Our findings demonstrate a model for achieving both recruitment targets and inclusive trial participation to counteract overrepresentation of participants of European descent in clinical research.","PeriodicalId":19349,"journal":{"name":"NPJ Digital Medicine","volume":"33 1","pages":"601"},"PeriodicalIF":15.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Representation is power: traditional, hybrid, and digital recruitment results from a non-randomized clinical trial engaging adolescents.\",\"authors\":\"Taylor B Harrison,Jessica A Sinclair,Lisa J Martin,Kristin Childers-Buschle,Holly Elder,Sunyang Fu,Hongfang Liu,William B Brinkman,Melanie F Myers,Michelle L McGowan\",\"doi\":\"10.1038/s41746-025-01947-x\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Clinical trials support the iterative advancement of modern medicine. However, challenges in achieving population-representativeness or participant sampling commensurate with the burden of disease can limit the generalizability and reproducibility of trial results. Here, we present the recruitment strategies and cohort profile of the Engaging Adolescents in Decisions about Return of Genomic Research Results non-randomized clinical trial (NCT0448106), where traditional, targeted hybrid, and digital recruitment methods were implemented with quota sampling to enroll diverse adolescents (ages 13-17) and young adults (ages 18-21). The largest proportion of participants enrolled through digital strategies (39.1%), followed by traditional (34.2%), and targeted hybrid strategies (23.2%). Despite lower enrollment, targeted hybrid recruitment, involving letters and text messages, had the largest proportion of participants from groups historically underrepresented in research (87.5%), compared to traditional (48.5%) and digital (32.3%) methods (p < 0.001). Our findings demonstrate a model for achieving both recruitment targets and inclusive trial participation to counteract overrepresentation of participants of European descent in clinical research.\",\"PeriodicalId\":19349,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"NPJ Digital Medicine\",\"volume\":\"33 1\",\"pages\":\"601\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":15.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"NPJ Digital Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41746-025-01947-x\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"NPJ Digital Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41746-025-01947-x","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
Representation is power: traditional, hybrid, and digital recruitment results from a non-randomized clinical trial engaging adolescents.
Clinical trials support the iterative advancement of modern medicine. However, challenges in achieving population-representativeness or participant sampling commensurate with the burden of disease can limit the generalizability and reproducibility of trial results. Here, we present the recruitment strategies and cohort profile of the Engaging Adolescents in Decisions about Return of Genomic Research Results non-randomized clinical trial (NCT0448106), where traditional, targeted hybrid, and digital recruitment methods were implemented with quota sampling to enroll diverse adolescents (ages 13-17) and young adults (ages 18-21). The largest proportion of participants enrolled through digital strategies (39.1%), followed by traditional (34.2%), and targeted hybrid strategies (23.2%). Despite lower enrollment, targeted hybrid recruitment, involving letters and text messages, had the largest proportion of participants from groups historically underrepresented in research (87.5%), compared to traditional (48.5%) and digital (32.3%) methods (p < 0.001). Our findings demonstrate a model for achieving both recruitment targets and inclusive trial participation to counteract overrepresentation of participants of European descent in clinical research.
期刊介绍:
npj Digital Medicine is an online open-access journal that focuses on publishing peer-reviewed research in the field of digital medicine. The journal covers various aspects of digital medicine, including the application and implementation of digital and mobile technologies in clinical settings, virtual healthcare, and the use of artificial intelligence and informatics.
The primary goal of the journal is to support innovation and the advancement of healthcare through the integration of new digital and mobile technologies. When determining if a manuscript is suitable for publication, the journal considers four important criteria: novelty, clinical relevance, scientific rigor, and digital innovation.