创新的辐射防护系统可以减少电生理过程中铅围裙的重量。

IF 2.6
Avishag Laish-Farkash, Michael Rahkovich, Yonatan Kogan, Gergana Marincheva, Eyal Ben-Assa, Ariel Roguin, Eli I Lev
{"title":"创新的辐射防护系统可以减少电生理过程中铅围裙的重量。","authors":"Avishag Laish-Farkash, Michael Rahkovich, Yonatan Kogan, Gergana Marincheva, Eyal Ben-Assa, Ariel Roguin, Eli I Lev","doi":"10.1007/s10840-025-02123-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Fluoroscopy-guided medical procedures require medical personnel to wear lead aprons (typically 0.5-mm Pb), which weigh up to 7 kg and can cause significant occupational injuries. A novel robotic radiation-blocking system, Radiaction, reduces full-body scattered radiation by 92% for all Cath-lab staff.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study aimed to determine if lighter lead aprons, when combined with Radiaction, can provide protection comparable to the standard 0.5-mm Pb aprons.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Three setups were tested: (1) 0.5-mm Pb apron without Radiaction (control), (2) 0.25-mm Pb apron with Radiaction, and (3) 0.125-mm Pb apron with Radiaction. Radiation attenuation was measured through analytic calculations, bench tests, and clinical prospective controlled evaluations in an electrophysiology laboratory.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>According to analytical calculations, radiation reduction was 98% for 0.5-mm Pb aprons, 98.5% for 0.25-mm Pb with Radiaction, and 97% for 0.125-mm Pb with Radiaction. Bench tests showed reductions of 97%, 98.9%, and 98%, respectively. Clinical evaluations showed reductions of 99.2% for ablation procedures (98.8% upper- and 99.6% lower body) and 97.1% reductions for cardiovascular implantable electronic devices (CIED) procedures (94.4% upper- and 99.7% lower body) with the 0.25-mm Pb apron and Radiaction. With the 0.125-mm Pb apron and Radiaction, reductions were 97.9% for ablations (97.4% upper- and 98.4% lower body) and 81.7% for CIED procedures (65% upper- and 98.5% lower body).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The 0.25-mm Pb apron with Radiaction appears to surpass the standard 0.5-mm Pb apron in radiation protection, while the 0.125-mm Pb apron with Radiaction offers comparable protection. This suggests that Radiaction enables significant apron weight reduction during electrophysiologic procedures without compromising safety and potentially reducing orthopedic injuries.</p>","PeriodicalId":520675,"journal":{"name":"Journal of interventional cardiac electrophysiology : an international journal of arrhythmias and pacing","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Innovative radiation protection system enables reduction in the weight of lead aprons during electrophysiological procedures.\",\"authors\":\"Avishag Laish-Farkash, Michael Rahkovich, Yonatan Kogan, Gergana Marincheva, Eyal Ben-Assa, Ariel Roguin, Eli I Lev\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10840-025-02123-7\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Fluoroscopy-guided medical procedures require medical personnel to wear lead aprons (typically 0.5-mm Pb), which weigh up to 7 kg and can cause significant occupational injuries. A novel robotic radiation-blocking system, Radiaction, reduces full-body scattered radiation by 92% for all Cath-lab staff.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study aimed to determine if lighter lead aprons, when combined with Radiaction, can provide protection comparable to the standard 0.5-mm Pb aprons.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Three setups were tested: (1) 0.5-mm Pb apron without Radiaction (control), (2) 0.25-mm Pb apron with Radiaction, and (3) 0.125-mm Pb apron with Radiaction. Radiation attenuation was measured through analytic calculations, bench tests, and clinical prospective controlled evaluations in an electrophysiology laboratory.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>According to analytical calculations, radiation reduction was 98% for 0.5-mm Pb aprons, 98.5% for 0.25-mm Pb with Radiaction, and 97% for 0.125-mm Pb with Radiaction. Bench tests showed reductions of 97%, 98.9%, and 98%, respectively. Clinical evaluations showed reductions of 99.2% for ablation procedures (98.8% upper- and 99.6% lower body) and 97.1% reductions for cardiovascular implantable electronic devices (CIED) procedures (94.4% upper- and 99.7% lower body) with the 0.25-mm Pb apron and Radiaction. With the 0.125-mm Pb apron and Radiaction, reductions were 97.9% for ablations (97.4% upper- and 98.4% lower body) and 81.7% for CIED procedures (65% upper- and 98.5% lower body).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The 0.25-mm Pb apron with Radiaction appears to surpass the standard 0.5-mm Pb apron in radiation protection, while the 0.125-mm Pb apron with Radiaction offers comparable protection. This suggests that Radiaction enables significant apron weight reduction during electrophysiologic procedures without compromising safety and potentially reducing orthopedic injuries.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":520675,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of interventional cardiac electrophysiology : an international journal of arrhythmias and pacing\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of interventional cardiac electrophysiology : an international journal of arrhythmias and pacing\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10840-025-02123-7\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of interventional cardiac electrophysiology : an international journal of arrhythmias and pacing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10840-025-02123-7","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:透视引导下的医疗程序要求医务人员佩戴铅围裙(通常为0.5 mm铅),其重量可达7公斤,可造成严重的职业伤害。一种新型的机器人辐射阻断系统,Radiaction,为所有化验室工作人员减少了92%的全身散射辐射。目的:本研究旨在确定较轻的铅围裙,当与辐射结合时,是否可以提供与标准0.5 mm铅围裙相当的保护。方法:采用3种设置:(1)0.5 mm无辐射铅围裙(对照),(2)0.25 mm有辐射铅围裙(对照),(3)0.125 mm有辐射铅围裙(对照)。通过分析计算、台架试验和电生理实验室的临床前瞻性对照评估来测量辐射衰减。结果:经分析计算,0.5 mm铅围裙的减辐射率为98%,0.25 mm铅围裙的减辐射率为98.5%,0.125 mm铅围裙的减辐射率为97%。台架试验分别显示减少了97%、98.9%和98%。临床评估显示,使用0.25 mm铅围裙和Radiaction的消融术减少99.2%(上半身98.8%,下半身99.6%),心血管植入式电子装置(CIED)手术减少97.1%(上半身94.4%,下半身99.7%)。使用0.125 mm的铅围裙和辐射,消融手术的减少率为97.9%(上半身97.4%,下半身98.4%),CIED手术的减少率为81.7%(上半身65%,下半身98.5%)。结论:带Radiaction的0.25 mm铅围裙的防护效果优于标准的0.5 mm铅围裙,而带Radiaction的0.125 mm铅围裙的防护效果与标准的0.5 mm铅围裙相当。这表明,在电生理手术过程中,放射治疗可以显著减轻围板重量,而不会影响安全性,并可能减少骨科损伤。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Innovative radiation protection system enables reduction in the weight of lead aprons during electrophysiological procedures.

Background: Fluoroscopy-guided medical procedures require medical personnel to wear lead aprons (typically 0.5-mm Pb), which weigh up to 7 kg and can cause significant occupational injuries. A novel robotic radiation-blocking system, Radiaction, reduces full-body scattered radiation by 92% for all Cath-lab staff.

Objectives: This study aimed to determine if lighter lead aprons, when combined with Radiaction, can provide protection comparable to the standard 0.5-mm Pb aprons.

Methods: Three setups were tested: (1) 0.5-mm Pb apron without Radiaction (control), (2) 0.25-mm Pb apron with Radiaction, and (3) 0.125-mm Pb apron with Radiaction. Radiation attenuation was measured through analytic calculations, bench tests, and clinical prospective controlled evaluations in an electrophysiology laboratory.

Results: According to analytical calculations, radiation reduction was 98% for 0.5-mm Pb aprons, 98.5% for 0.25-mm Pb with Radiaction, and 97% for 0.125-mm Pb with Radiaction. Bench tests showed reductions of 97%, 98.9%, and 98%, respectively. Clinical evaluations showed reductions of 99.2% for ablation procedures (98.8% upper- and 99.6% lower body) and 97.1% reductions for cardiovascular implantable electronic devices (CIED) procedures (94.4% upper- and 99.7% lower body) with the 0.25-mm Pb apron and Radiaction. With the 0.125-mm Pb apron and Radiaction, reductions were 97.9% for ablations (97.4% upper- and 98.4% lower body) and 81.7% for CIED procedures (65% upper- and 98.5% lower body).

Conclusions: The 0.25-mm Pb apron with Radiaction appears to surpass the standard 0.5-mm Pb apron in radiation protection, while the 0.125-mm Pb apron with Radiaction offers comparable protection. This suggests that Radiaction enables significant apron weight reduction during electrophysiologic procedures without compromising safety and potentially reducing orthopedic injuries.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信