Avishag Laish-Farkash, Michael Rahkovich, Yonatan Kogan, Gergana Marincheva, Eyal Ben-Assa, Ariel Roguin, Eli I Lev
{"title":"创新的辐射防护系统可以减少电生理过程中铅围裙的重量。","authors":"Avishag Laish-Farkash, Michael Rahkovich, Yonatan Kogan, Gergana Marincheva, Eyal Ben-Assa, Ariel Roguin, Eli I Lev","doi":"10.1007/s10840-025-02123-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Fluoroscopy-guided medical procedures require medical personnel to wear lead aprons (typically 0.5-mm Pb), which weigh up to 7 kg and can cause significant occupational injuries. A novel robotic radiation-blocking system, Radiaction, reduces full-body scattered radiation by 92% for all Cath-lab staff.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study aimed to determine if lighter lead aprons, when combined with Radiaction, can provide protection comparable to the standard 0.5-mm Pb aprons.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Three setups were tested: (1) 0.5-mm Pb apron without Radiaction (control), (2) 0.25-mm Pb apron with Radiaction, and (3) 0.125-mm Pb apron with Radiaction. Radiation attenuation was measured through analytic calculations, bench tests, and clinical prospective controlled evaluations in an electrophysiology laboratory.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>According to analytical calculations, radiation reduction was 98% for 0.5-mm Pb aprons, 98.5% for 0.25-mm Pb with Radiaction, and 97% for 0.125-mm Pb with Radiaction. Bench tests showed reductions of 97%, 98.9%, and 98%, respectively. Clinical evaluations showed reductions of 99.2% for ablation procedures (98.8% upper- and 99.6% lower body) and 97.1% reductions for cardiovascular implantable electronic devices (CIED) procedures (94.4% upper- and 99.7% lower body) with the 0.25-mm Pb apron and Radiaction. With the 0.125-mm Pb apron and Radiaction, reductions were 97.9% for ablations (97.4% upper- and 98.4% lower body) and 81.7% for CIED procedures (65% upper- and 98.5% lower body).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The 0.25-mm Pb apron with Radiaction appears to surpass the standard 0.5-mm Pb apron in radiation protection, while the 0.125-mm Pb apron with Radiaction offers comparable protection. This suggests that Radiaction enables significant apron weight reduction during electrophysiologic procedures without compromising safety and potentially reducing orthopedic injuries.</p>","PeriodicalId":520675,"journal":{"name":"Journal of interventional cardiac electrophysiology : an international journal of arrhythmias and pacing","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Innovative radiation protection system enables reduction in the weight of lead aprons during electrophysiological procedures.\",\"authors\":\"Avishag Laish-Farkash, Michael Rahkovich, Yonatan Kogan, Gergana Marincheva, Eyal Ben-Assa, Ariel Roguin, Eli I Lev\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10840-025-02123-7\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Fluoroscopy-guided medical procedures require medical personnel to wear lead aprons (typically 0.5-mm Pb), which weigh up to 7 kg and can cause significant occupational injuries. A novel robotic radiation-blocking system, Radiaction, reduces full-body scattered radiation by 92% for all Cath-lab staff.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study aimed to determine if lighter lead aprons, when combined with Radiaction, can provide protection comparable to the standard 0.5-mm Pb aprons.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Three setups were tested: (1) 0.5-mm Pb apron without Radiaction (control), (2) 0.25-mm Pb apron with Radiaction, and (3) 0.125-mm Pb apron with Radiaction. Radiation attenuation was measured through analytic calculations, bench tests, and clinical prospective controlled evaluations in an electrophysiology laboratory.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>According to analytical calculations, radiation reduction was 98% for 0.5-mm Pb aprons, 98.5% for 0.25-mm Pb with Radiaction, and 97% for 0.125-mm Pb with Radiaction. Bench tests showed reductions of 97%, 98.9%, and 98%, respectively. Clinical evaluations showed reductions of 99.2% for ablation procedures (98.8% upper- and 99.6% lower body) and 97.1% reductions for cardiovascular implantable electronic devices (CIED) procedures (94.4% upper- and 99.7% lower body) with the 0.25-mm Pb apron and Radiaction. With the 0.125-mm Pb apron and Radiaction, reductions were 97.9% for ablations (97.4% upper- and 98.4% lower body) and 81.7% for CIED procedures (65% upper- and 98.5% lower body).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The 0.25-mm Pb apron with Radiaction appears to surpass the standard 0.5-mm Pb apron in radiation protection, while the 0.125-mm Pb apron with Radiaction offers comparable protection. This suggests that Radiaction enables significant apron weight reduction during electrophysiologic procedures without compromising safety and potentially reducing orthopedic injuries.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":520675,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of interventional cardiac electrophysiology : an international journal of arrhythmias and pacing\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of interventional cardiac electrophysiology : an international journal of arrhythmias and pacing\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10840-025-02123-7\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of interventional cardiac electrophysiology : an international journal of arrhythmias and pacing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10840-025-02123-7","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Innovative radiation protection system enables reduction in the weight of lead aprons during electrophysiological procedures.
Background: Fluoroscopy-guided medical procedures require medical personnel to wear lead aprons (typically 0.5-mm Pb), which weigh up to 7 kg and can cause significant occupational injuries. A novel robotic radiation-blocking system, Radiaction, reduces full-body scattered radiation by 92% for all Cath-lab staff.
Objectives: This study aimed to determine if lighter lead aprons, when combined with Radiaction, can provide protection comparable to the standard 0.5-mm Pb aprons.
Methods: Three setups were tested: (1) 0.5-mm Pb apron without Radiaction (control), (2) 0.25-mm Pb apron with Radiaction, and (3) 0.125-mm Pb apron with Radiaction. Radiation attenuation was measured through analytic calculations, bench tests, and clinical prospective controlled evaluations in an electrophysiology laboratory.
Results: According to analytical calculations, radiation reduction was 98% for 0.5-mm Pb aprons, 98.5% for 0.25-mm Pb with Radiaction, and 97% for 0.125-mm Pb with Radiaction. Bench tests showed reductions of 97%, 98.9%, and 98%, respectively. Clinical evaluations showed reductions of 99.2% for ablation procedures (98.8% upper- and 99.6% lower body) and 97.1% reductions for cardiovascular implantable electronic devices (CIED) procedures (94.4% upper- and 99.7% lower body) with the 0.25-mm Pb apron and Radiaction. With the 0.125-mm Pb apron and Radiaction, reductions were 97.9% for ablations (97.4% upper- and 98.4% lower body) and 81.7% for CIED procedures (65% upper- and 98.5% lower body).
Conclusions: The 0.25-mm Pb apron with Radiaction appears to surpass the standard 0.5-mm Pb apron in radiation protection, while the 0.125-mm Pb apron with Radiaction offers comparable protection. This suggests that Radiaction enables significant apron weight reduction during electrophysiologic procedures without compromising safety and potentially reducing orthopedic injuries.