aba喂养婴儿干预的经验:一项妇女、同伴支持者和协调者的质性研究。

IF 2.6 2区 医学 Q3 NUTRITION & DIETETICS
Joanne Clarke, Nicola Crossland, Stephan Dombrowski, Pat Hoddinott, Jenny Ingram, Debbie Johnson, Kate Jolly, Christine MacArthur, Jennifer McKell, Ngawai Moss, Julia Sanders, Nicola Savory, Beck Taylor, Gill Thomson
{"title":"aba喂养婴儿干预的经验:一项妇女、同伴支持者和协调者的质性研究。","authors":"Joanne Clarke, Nicola Crossland, Stephan Dombrowski, Pat Hoddinott, Jenny Ingram, Debbie Johnson, Kate Jolly, Christine MacArthur, Jennifer McKell, Ngawai Moss, Julia Sanders, Nicola Savory, Beck Taylor, Gill Thomson","doi":"10.1111/mcn.70124","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>UK breastfeeding rates are low, with health inequalities in initiation and continuation. Breastfeeding peer support interventions are recommended in UK and global policy. The Assets-based feeding help Before and After birth (ABA-feed) trial tested the effectiveness of proactive, woman-centred support for infant feeding delivered by trained peer supporters (infant feeding helpers; IFHs) in addition to usual care at 17 UK sites. Using data from an embedded process evaluation, this paper reports the views and experiences of women receiving, and the IFHs and coordinators delivering, ABA-feed. Women (n = 2475) were recruited to the trial antenatally; 1458 were allocated to the intervention. Thirty women from five study sites took part in qualitative interviews between 9 and 23 weeks postnatal. IFHs (n = 72) and coordinators (n = 25) from across all sites participated in individual or group interviews towards the end of the intervention period. Interview transcripts were analysed alongside 1147 free-text responses from an 8-week postnatal follow-up survey using Framework Analysis. The ABA-feed intervention was highly acceptable to women, including younger women, those with less education, from diverse ethnic groups, single mothers, and those who intended to formula feed, as well as to IFHs and coordinators. Both remote and in-person support was acceptable. While women valued proactive daily contact during the first 14 days postpartum, some IFHs found this challenging, and some struggled with supporting women who chose formula feeding or were less engaged. This study highlights the value of flexible, proactive, woman-centred infant feeding support. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ISRCTN17395671.</p>","PeriodicalId":51112,"journal":{"name":"Maternal and Child Nutrition","volume":" ","pages":"e70124"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Experiences of the ABA-Feed Infant Feeding Intervention: A Qualitative Study With Women, Peer Supporters and Coordinators.\",\"authors\":\"Joanne Clarke, Nicola Crossland, Stephan Dombrowski, Pat Hoddinott, Jenny Ingram, Debbie Johnson, Kate Jolly, Christine MacArthur, Jennifer McKell, Ngawai Moss, Julia Sanders, Nicola Savory, Beck Taylor, Gill Thomson\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/mcn.70124\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>UK breastfeeding rates are low, with health inequalities in initiation and continuation. Breastfeeding peer support interventions are recommended in UK and global policy. The Assets-based feeding help Before and After birth (ABA-feed) trial tested the effectiveness of proactive, woman-centred support for infant feeding delivered by trained peer supporters (infant feeding helpers; IFHs) in addition to usual care at 17 UK sites. Using data from an embedded process evaluation, this paper reports the views and experiences of women receiving, and the IFHs and coordinators delivering, ABA-feed. Women (n = 2475) were recruited to the trial antenatally; 1458 were allocated to the intervention. Thirty women from five study sites took part in qualitative interviews between 9 and 23 weeks postnatal. IFHs (n = 72) and coordinators (n = 25) from across all sites participated in individual or group interviews towards the end of the intervention period. Interview transcripts were analysed alongside 1147 free-text responses from an 8-week postnatal follow-up survey using Framework Analysis. The ABA-feed intervention was highly acceptable to women, including younger women, those with less education, from diverse ethnic groups, single mothers, and those who intended to formula feed, as well as to IFHs and coordinators. Both remote and in-person support was acceptable. While women valued proactive daily contact during the first 14 days postpartum, some IFHs found this challenging, and some struggled with supporting women who chose formula feeding or were less engaged. This study highlights the value of flexible, proactive, woman-centred infant feeding support. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ISRCTN17395671.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51112,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Maternal and Child Nutrition\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"e70124\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Maternal and Child Nutrition\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/mcn.70124\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"NUTRITION & DIETETICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Maternal and Child Nutrition","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/mcn.70124","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"NUTRITION & DIETETICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

英国母乳喂养率很低,在开始和继续母乳喂养方面存在健康不平等。母乳喂养同伴支持干预建议在英国和全球政策。基于资产的产前和产后喂养帮助(ABA-feed)试验测试了除英国17个地点的常规护理外,由训练有素的同伴支持者(婴儿喂养助手;ifh)提供的积极的、以妇女为中心的婴儿喂养支持的有效性。本文利用嵌入式过程评估的数据,报告了接受aba馈送的妇女以及ifh和协调员的观点和经验。妇女(n = 2475)在产前被招募到试验中;1458人被分配到干预行动。来自五个研究地点的30名妇女在产后9至23周内参加了定性访谈。来自所有站点的ifh (n = 72)和协调员(n = 25)在干预期结束时参加了个人或小组访谈。访谈记录与产后8周随访调查的1147份自由文本回复一起使用框架分析进行分析。aba -饲料干预对妇女,包括年轻妇女、受教育程度较低的妇女、来自不同种族群体的妇女、单身母亲和打算使用配方饲料的妇女,以及ifh和协调员都是高度可接受的。远程和现场支持都是可以接受的。虽然女性在产后14天内重视主动的日常接触,但一些ifh发现这很有挑战性,有些ifh难以支持选择配方奶喂养或参与度较低的女性。这项研究强调了灵活、主动、以妇女为中心的婴儿喂养支持的价值。试验注册:isrctn17395671。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Experiences of the ABA-Feed Infant Feeding Intervention: A Qualitative Study With Women, Peer Supporters and Coordinators.

UK breastfeeding rates are low, with health inequalities in initiation and continuation. Breastfeeding peer support interventions are recommended in UK and global policy. The Assets-based feeding help Before and After birth (ABA-feed) trial tested the effectiveness of proactive, woman-centred support for infant feeding delivered by trained peer supporters (infant feeding helpers; IFHs) in addition to usual care at 17 UK sites. Using data from an embedded process evaluation, this paper reports the views and experiences of women receiving, and the IFHs and coordinators delivering, ABA-feed. Women (n = 2475) were recruited to the trial antenatally; 1458 were allocated to the intervention. Thirty women from five study sites took part in qualitative interviews between 9 and 23 weeks postnatal. IFHs (n = 72) and coordinators (n = 25) from across all sites participated in individual or group interviews towards the end of the intervention period. Interview transcripts were analysed alongside 1147 free-text responses from an 8-week postnatal follow-up survey using Framework Analysis. The ABA-feed intervention was highly acceptable to women, including younger women, those with less education, from diverse ethnic groups, single mothers, and those who intended to formula feed, as well as to IFHs and coordinators. Both remote and in-person support was acceptable. While women valued proactive daily contact during the first 14 days postpartum, some IFHs found this challenging, and some struggled with supporting women who chose formula feeding or were less engaged. This study highlights the value of flexible, proactive, woman-centred infant feeding support. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ISRCTN17395671.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Maternal and Child Nutrition
Maternal and Child Nutrition 医学-小儿科
CiteScore
7.70
自引率
8.80%
发文量
144
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Maternal & Child Nutrition addresses fundamental aspects of nutrition and its outcomes in women and their children, both in early and later life, and keeps its audience fully informed about new initiatives, the latest research findings and innovative ways of responding to changes in public attitudes and policy. Drawing from global sources, the Journal provides an invaluable source of up to date information for health professionals, academics and service users with interests in maternal and child nutrition. Its scope includes pre-conception, antenatal and postnatal maternal nutrition, women''s nutrition throughout their reproductive years, and fetal, neonatal, infant, child and adolescent nutrition and their effects throughout life.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信