Adam Mssika, Benjamin Robinson, Shane Tinsley, Alessandro Bertini, Alex Stephens, Alessio Finocchiaro, Silvia Vigano, Antonio Perri, Giovanni Lughezzani, Nicolò Buffi, Gabriele Sorce, Vincenzo Ficarra, Andrea Salonia, Alberto Briganti, Francesco Montorsi, Akshay Sood, Craig Rogers, Firas Abdollah
{"title":"密歇根州监禁与非监禁患者前列腺癌特异性死亡率的差异:一项全州回顾性队列研究。","authors":"Adam Mssika, Benjamin Robinson, Shane Tinsley, Alessandro Bertini, Alex Stephens, Alessio Finocchiaro, Silvia Vigano, Antonio Perri, Giovanni Lughezzani, Nicolò Buffi, Gabriele Sorce, Vincenzo Ficarra, Andrea Salonia, Alberto Briganti, Francesco Montorsi, Akshay Sood, Craig Rogers, Firas Abdollah","doi":"10.1097/UPJ.0000000000000900","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>With rising incarceration and cancer diagnosis rates in the US, understanding the relationship between incarceration status and cancer outcomes is critical. Our study examined prostate cancer specific mortality (PCSM) disparities in incarcerated patients (IP) vs. non-incarcerated patients (NP) in Michigan.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The Michigan Department of Health & Human Services Database (MDHHS) was screened for prostate cancer (PCa)(Histology=8140) diagnosed patients between 2004-2015. IP and NP were cross-analyzed with demographic and clinical covariates. The cumulative incidence function (CIF) and competing risks multivariable regression were used to examine incarceration impact on PCSM after accounting for all covariates.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In our cohort of 76,045 patients, 152 were IP. Compared to NP, IP were more likely to be younger (median 58.0 years vs. 67.0 years) and non-hispanic black (NHB)(65.8% vs. 16.0%), both p<0.0001. IP had higher probability to be diagnosed with ≤cT2 PCa (95.3% vs. 88.5%;p<0.0001), cN0 PCa (94.1% vs. 86.8%;p<0.01), and undergo surgery as first course treatment (31.6% vs. 24.4%;p=0.02). Compared to NP, no difference was found in gleason grade ≥8 (52.6% vs. 51.4%;p=0.9) and PSA (median 7.5 vs. 5.9;p=0.6). At 10 years, PCSM was 14.7% (95% CI:7.0%-25.0%) in IP vs. 11.4% (95% CI:11.1%-11.7%) in NP (p=0.2). At the multivariable analysis, IP had a 2.44 fold (95% CI:1.53-3.88;p<0.001) higher PCSM risk than NP.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Despite being diagnosed with PCa at a younger age and an earlier stage, IP showed a higher PCSM risk than NP. Further research is warranted to examine this difference.</p>","PeriodicalId":45220,"journal":{"name":"Urology Practice","volume":" ","pages":"101097UPJ0000000000000900"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Disparities in Prostate Cancer Specific Mortality in Incarcerated vs. Non-Incarcerated Patients in Michigan: A Statewide Retrospective Cohort Study.\",\"authors\":\"Adam Mssika, Benjamin Robinson, Shane Tinsley, Alessandro Bertini, Alex Stephens, Alessio Finocchiaro, Silvia Vigano, Antonio Perri, Giovanni Lughezzani, Nicolò Buffi, Gabriele Sorce, Vincenzo Ficarra, Andrea Salonia, Alberto Briganti, Francesco Montorsi, Akshay Sood, Craig Rogers, Firas Abdollah\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/UPJ.0000000000000900\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>With rising incarceration and cancer diagnosis rates in the US, understanding the relationship between incarceration status and cancer outcomes is critical. Our study examined prostate cancer specific mortality (PCSM) disparities in incarcerated patients (IP) vs. non-incarcerated patients (NP) in Michigan.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The Michigan Department of Health & Human Services Database (MDHHS) was screened for prostate cancer (PCa)(Histology=8140) diagnosed patients between 2004-2015. IP and NP were cross-analyzed with demographic and clinical covariates. The cumulative incidence function (CIF) and competing risks multivariable regression were used to examine incarceration impact on PCSM after accounting for all covariates.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In our cohort of 76,045 patients, 152 were IP. Compared to NP, IP were more likely to be younger (median 58.0 years vs. 67.0 years) and non-hispanic black (NHB)(65.8% vs. 16.0%), both p<0.0001. IP had higher probability to be diagnosed with ≤cT2 PCa (95.3% vs. 88.5%;p<0.0001), cN0 PCa (94.1% vs. 86.8%;p<0.01), and undergo surgery as first course treatment (31.6% vs. 24.4%;p=0.02). Compared to NP, no difference was found in gleason grade ≥8 (52.6% vs. 51.4%;p=0.9) and PSA (median 7.5 vs. 5.9;p=0.6). At 10 years, PCSM was 14.7% (95% CI:7.0%-25.0%) in IP vs. 11.4% (95% CI:11.1%-11.7%) in NP (p=0.2). At the multivariable analysis, IP had a 2.44 fold (95% CI:1.53-3.88;p<0.001) higher PCSM risk than NP.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Despite being diagnosed with PCa at a younger age and an earlier stage, IP showed a higher PCSM risk than NP. Further research is warranted to examine this difference.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":45220,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Urology Practice\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"101097UPJ0000000000000900\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Urology Practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/UPJ.0000000000000900\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Urology Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/UPJ.0000000000000900","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
随着美国监禁和癌症诊断率的上升,了解监禁状况和癌症结局之间的关系至关重要。我们的研究检查了密歇根州监禁患者(IP)与非监禁患者(NP)的前列腺癌特异性死亡率(PCSM)差异。方法:对2004-2015年密歇根州卫生与公众服务部数据库(MDHHS)中诊断为前列腺癌(PCa)(组织学=8140)的患者进行筛查。IP和NP与人口统计学和临床协变量进行交叉分析。在考虑所有协变量后,使用累积关联函数(CIF)和竞争风险多变量回归来检验监禁对PCSM的影响。结果:在我们的76045例患者队列中,152例为IP。与NP相比,IP更可能是年轻人(中位年龄58.0岁vs. 67.0岁)和非西班牙裔黑人(NHB)(65.8% vs. 16.0%)。结论:尽管被诊断为PCa的年龄更小,早期阶段,IP比NP显示出更高的PCSM风险。需要进一步的研究来检验这种差异。
Disparities in Prostate Cancer Specific Mortality in Incarcerated vs. Non-Incarcerated Patients in Michigan: A Statewide Retrospective Cohort Study.
Introduction: With rising incarceration and cancer diagnosis rates in the US, understanding the relationship between incarceration status and cancer outcomes is critical. Our study examined prostate cancer specific mortality (PCSM) disparities in incarcerated patients (IP) vs. non-incarcerated patients (NP) in Michigan.
Methods: The Michigan Department of Health & Human Services Database (MDHHS) was screened for prostate cancer (PCa)(Histology=8140) diagnosed patients between 2004-2015. IP and NP were cross-analyzed with demographic and clinical covariates. The cumulative incidence function (CIF) and competing risks multivariable regression were used to examine incarceration impact on PCSM after accounting for all covariates.
Results: In our cohort of 76,045 patients, 152 were IP. Compared to NP, IP were more likely to be younger (median 58.0 years vs. 67.0 years) and non-hispanic black (NHB)(65.8% vs. 16.0%), both p<0.0001. IP had higher probability to be diagnosed with ≤cT2 PCa (95.3% vs. 88.5%;p<0.0001), cN0 PCa (94.1% vs. 86.8%;p<0.01), and undergo surgery as first course treatment (31.6% vs. 24.4%;p=0.02). Compared to NP, no difference was found in gleason grade ≥8 (52.6% vs. 51.4%;p=0.9) and PSA (median 7.5 vs. 5.9;p=0.6). At 10 years, PCSM was 14.7% (95% CI:7.0%-25.0%) in IP vs. 11.4% (95% CI:11.1%-11.7%) in NP (p=0.2). At the multivariable analysis, IP had a 2.44 fold (95% CI:1.53-3.88;p<0.001) higher PCSM risk than NP.
Conclusion: Despite being diagnosed with PCa at a younger age and an earlier stage, IP showed a higher PCSM risk than NP. Further research is warranted to examine this difference.