Reham Kaki, Hala Zeinelabidin, Sukainah N Rashed, Asmaa Baba
{"title":"评估载玻片凝集法在沙特阿拉伯布鲁氏菌病的诊断效用:沙特阿拉伯吉达国际医学中心的回顾性研究。","authors":"Reham Kaki, Hala Zeinelabidin, Sukainah N Rashed, Asmaa Baba","doi":"10.1371/journal.pntd.0013206","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Brucellosis, a prevalent zoonotic disease in endemic regions like Saudi Arabia, poses diagnostic challenges due to its nonspecific clinical manifestations. This disease is endemic in various regions, including the Mediterranean basin, the Middle East, Asia, Africa, and Latin America. This retrospective study is designed to evaluate the diagnostic utility of the slide agglutination method for brucellosis. By examining its sensitivity, specificity, and overall performance, this research will provide insights into the reliability of the slide agglutination method as a diagnostic tool in a high-prevalence setting.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective study, conducted at the International Medical Center, Jeddah, compared the real-world diagnostic performance of the Slide Agglutination Method (SAM) with gold-standard blood cultures and Brucella serology. Over 734 cases (37 Brucella-positive and 697 Brucella-negative) were reviewed between 2019 and 2022.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>SAM achieved 86.5% sensitivity and 99.3% specificity, with an average turnaround time of 2.32 hours. In contrast, blood culture showed 40.9% sensitivity and 94.5% accuracy, and conventional serology demonstrated comparable sensitivity but longer processing times.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>SAM combines speed, simplicity, and robust accuracy, making it an ideal first-line screen for acute brucellosis in endemic, resource-limited settings. However, its performance in chronic or low-titer infections remains less well characterized. Our detailed operational metrics fill a local evidence gap and support the Saudi Ministry of Health in updating national screening guidelines.</p>","PeriodicalId":49000,"journal":{"name":"PLoS Neglected Tropical Diseases","volume":"19 10","pages":"e0013206"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12500134/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluating the diagnostic utility of the slide agglutination method for brucellosis in Saudi Arabia: A retrospective study at International Medical Center, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia.\",\"authors\":\"Reham Kaki, Hala Zeinelabidin, Sukainah N Rashed, Asmaa Baba\",\"doi\":\"10.1371/journal.pntd.0013206\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Brucellosis, a prevalent zoonotic disease in endemic regions like Saudi Arabia, poses diagnostic challenges due to its nonspecific clinical manifestations. This disease is endemic in various regions, including the Mediterranean basin, the Middle East, Asia, Africa, and Latin America. This retrospective study is designed to evaluate the diagnostic utility of the slide agglutination method for brucellosis. By examining its sensitivity, specificity, and overall performance, this research will provide insights into the reliability of the slide agglutination method as a diagnostic tool in a high-prevalence setting.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective study, conducted at the International Medical Center, Jeddah, compared the real-world diagnostic performance of the Slide Agglutination Method (SAM) with gold-standard blood cultures and Brucella serology. Over 734 cases (37 Brucella-positive and 697 Brucella-negative) were reviewed between 2019 and 2022.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>SAM achieved 86.5% sensitivity and 99.3% specificity, with an average turnaround time of 2.32 hours. In contrast, blood culture showed 40.9% sensitivity and 94.5% accuracy, and conventional serology demonstrated comparable sensitivity but longer processing times.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>SAM combines speed, simplicity, and robust accuracy, making it an ideal first-line screen for acute brucellosis in endemic, resource-limited settings. However, its performance in chronic or low-titer infections remains less well characterized. Our detailed operational metrics fill a local evidence gap and support the Saudi Ministry of Health in updating national screening guidelines.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49000,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"PLoS Neglected Tropical Diseases\",\"volume\":\"19 10\",\"pages\":\"e0013206\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12500134/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"PLoS Neglected Tropical Diseases\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0013206\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/10/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PARASITOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PLoS Neglected Tropical Diseases","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0013206","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/10/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PARASITOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Evaluating the diagnostic utility of the slide agglutination method for brucellosis in Saudi Arabia: A retrospective study at International Medical Center, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia.
Background: Brucellosis, a prevalent zoonotic disease in endemic regions like Saudi Arabia, poses diagnostic challenges due to its nonspecific clinical manifestations. This disease is endemic in various regions, including the Mediterranean basin, the Middle East, Asia, Africa, and Latin America. This retrospective study is designed to evaluate the diagnostic utility of the slide agglutination method for brucellosis. By examining its sensitivity, specificity, and overall performance, this research will provide insights into the reliability of the slide agglutination method as a diagnostic tool in a high-prevalence setting.
Methods: This retrospective study, conducted at the International Medical Center, Jeddah, compared the real-world diagnostic performance of the Slide Agglutination Method (SAM) with gold-standard blood cultures and Brucella serology. Over 734 cases (37 Brucella-positive and 697 Brucella-negative) were reviewed between 2019 and 2022.
Results: SAM achieved 86.5% sensitivity and 99.3% specificity, with an average turnaround time of 2.32 hours. In contrast, blood culture showed 40.9% sensitivity and 94.5% accuracy, and conventional serology demonstrated comparable sensitivity but longer processing times.
Conclusion: SAM combines speed, simplicity, and robust accuracy, making it an ideal first-line screen for acute brucellosis in endemic, resource-limited settings. However, its performance in chronic or low-titer infections remains less well characterized. Our detailed operational metrics fill a local evidence gap and support the Saudi Ministry of Health in updating national screening guidelines.
期刊介绍:
PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases publishes research devoted to the pathology, epidemiology, prevention, treatment and control of the neglected tropical diseases (NTDs), as well as relevant public policy.
The NTDs are defined as a group of poverty-promoting chronic infectious diseases, which primarily occur in rural areas and poor urban areas of low-income and middle-income countries. Their impact on child health and development, pregnancy, and worker productivity, as well as their stigmatizing features limit economic stability.
All aspects of these diseases are considered, including:
Pathogenesis
Clinical features
Pharmacology and treatment
Diagnosis
Epidemiology
Vector biology
Vaccinology and prevention
Demographic, ecological and social determinants
Public health and policy aspects (including cost-effectiveness analyses).