Túlio Guilherme Soares Marques, Diana Rodrigues de Pina, Matheus Alvarez
{"title":"通过日常乳房x线摄影质量控制检测进行性x射线管退化。","authors":"Túlio Guilherme Soares Marques, Diana Rodrigues de Pina, Matheus Alvarez","doi":"10.1080/03091902.2025.2553132","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study evaluated whether routine daily quality control (QC) tests can anticipate X-ray tube degradation in a digital mammography system. Over 30 months, tube loading, contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR), and image quality scores were extracted from daily QC tests and analysed alongside a documented tube failure in September 2024. These results were compared with annual tube output measurements and environmental data. A progressive rise in tube loading was observed prior to tube failure, increasing from 84.45 to 94.58 mAs (12.0%). The Mann-Kendall test confirmed a significant upward trend (τ = 0.461; <i>p</i> < 0.001), with Sen's slope indicating +0.19 mAs/month. Despite this, CNR values remained stable (mean = 14.76 ± 0.20), and image quality showed no degradation. However, tube output declined consistently (from 30.95 ± 3.08 to 28.76 ± 0.36 μGy/mAs), confirming reduced efficiency. Temperature and humidity remained within recommended limits. These findings suggest that gradual increases in tube loading can indicate early tube degradation, even when image quality remains unaffected. Beyond confirming equipment performance, daily QC may serve as a strategic tool to detect early signs of degradation, extend device lifespan, reduce unplanned downtime, and promote patient safety without added costs.</p>","PeriodicalId":39637,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Medical Engineering and Technology","volume":" ","pages":"1-8"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Progressive X-ray tube degradation detected via daily mammography quality control.\",\"authors\":\"Túlio Guilherme Soares Marques, Diana Rodrigues de Pina, Matheus Alvarez\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/03091902.2025.2553132\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>This study evaluated whether routine daily quality control (QC) tests can anticipate X-ray tube degradation in a digital mammography system. Over 30 months, tube loading, contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR), and image quality scores were extracted from daily QC tests and analysed alongside a documented tube failure in September 2024. These results were compared with annual tube output measurements and environmental data. A progressive rise in tube loading was observed prior to tube failure, increasing from 84.45 to 94.58 mAs (12.0%). The Mann-Kendall test confirmed a significant upward trend (τ = 0.461; <i>p</i> < 0.001), with Sen's slope indicating +0.19 mAs/month. Despite this, CNR values remained stable (mean = 14.76 ± 0.20), and image quality showed no degradation. However, tube output declined consistently (from 30.95 ± 3.08 to 28.76 ± 0.36 μGy/mAs), confirming reduced efficiency. Temperature and humidity remained within recommended limits. These findings suggest that gradual increases in tube loading can indicate early tube degradation, even when image quality remains unaffected. Beyond confirming equipment performance, daily QC may serve as a strategic tool to detect early signs of degradation, extend device lifespan, reduce unplanned downtime, and promote patient safety without added costs.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":39637,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Medical Engineering and Technology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-8\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Medical Engineering and Technology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/03091902.2025.2553132\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Engineering\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Medical Engineering and Technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/03091902.2025.2553132","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Engineering","Score":null,"Total":0}
Progressive X-ray tube degradation detected via daily mammography quality control.
This study evaluated whether routine daily quality control (QC) tests can anticipate X-ray tube degradation in a digital mammography system. Over 30 months, tube loading, contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR), and image quality scores were extracted from daily QC tests and analysed alongside a documented tube failure in September 2024. These results were compared with annual tube output measurements and environmental data. A progressive rise in tube loading was observed prior to tube failure, increasing from 84.45 to 94.58 mAs (12.0%). The Mann-Kendall test confirmed a significant upward trend (τ = 0.461; p < 0.001), with Sen's slope indicating +0.19 mAs/month. Despite this, CNR values remained stable (mean = 14.76 ± 0.20), and image quality showed no degradation. However, tube output declined consistently (from 30.95 ± 3.08 to 28.76 ± 0.36 μGy/mAs), confirming reduced efficiency. Temperature and humidity remained within recommended limits. These findings suggest that gradual increases in tube loading can indicate early tube degradation, even when image quality remains unaffected. Beyond confirming equipment performance, daily QC may serve as a strategic tool to detect early signs of degradation, extend device lifespan, reduce unplanned downtime, and promote patient safety without added costs.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Medical Engineering & Technology is an international, independent, multidisciplinary, bimonthly journal promoting an understanding of the physiological processes underlying disease processes and the appropriate application of technology. Features include authoritative review papers, the reporting of original research, and evaluation reports on new and existing techniques and devices. Each issue of the journal contains a comprehensive information service which provides news relevant to the world of medical technology, details of new products, book reviews, and selected contents of related journals.