乳腺癌患者电子健康记录支持社会支持评分的评价:计数和项目反应理论评分的比较。

IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q3 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Salene M W Jones, Rhonda-Lee F Aoki, Stacey E Alexeeff, David Carrell, David Cronkite, Lawrence H Kushi, David Mosen, Shaila Strayhorn, Leah Tuzzio, Jessica Mogk, Lauren Mammini, Candyce H Kroenke
{"title":"乳腺癌患者电子健康记录支持社会支持评分的评价:计数和项目反应理论评分的比较。","authors":"Salene M W Jones, Rhonda-Lee F Aoki, Stacey E Alexeeff, David Carrell, David Cronkite, Lawrence H Kushi, David Mosen, Shaila Strayhorn, Leah Tuzzio, Jessica Mogk, Lauren Mammini, Candyce H Kroenke","doi":"10.1177/19427891251383539","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In breast cancer, clinicians add data on social support to patient electronic health records (EHRs) often in free text notes, but those data may be challenging to use for population health initiatives or research purposes. We evaluated the EHR-Support score designed to summarize need for social support using data from the EHR. This study included 996 women from the Pathways study, a Kaiser Permanente Northern California cohort of women diagnosed in 2005-2013 with breast cancer. This unique data resource included both EHR data and questionnaire data on patient-reported social support. Using unstructured EHR data and natural language processing, we developed 11 concept groups (items) characterizing social support. We also used structured data to create two additional concept groups. EHR-Support scores reflecting the lack of social support were generated three ways: counting the number of negative concept groups (count score), using item response theory (IRT), and converting counts to the IRT metric (converted count scores). The count scores were only associated with two of six patient-reported measures (r's: -0.004 to -0.073). The IRT score (r's: -0.038 to -0.179) and converted count score (r's: -0.032 to -0.195) were associated with five of six patient-reported measures, indicating more need for support was associated with less patient-reported social support. The EHR-Support score is a valid and feasible measure of social support that can be used for health services research and managing population health. The converted count score may provide the best balance of validity, precision from IRT and feasibility.</p>","PeriodicalId":20396,"journal":{"name":"Population Health Management","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluation of the Electronic Health Record-Support Social Support Score in Breast Cancer: Comparison of Count and Item Response Theory Scores.\",\"authors\":\"Salene M W Jones, Rhonda-Lee F Aoki, Stacey E Alexeeff, David Carrell, David Cronkite, Lawrence H Kushi, David Mosen, Shaila Strayhorn, Leah Tuzzio, Jessica Mogk, Lauren Mammini, Candyce H Kroenke\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/19427891251383539\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>In breast cancer, clinicians add data on social support to patient electronic health records (EHRs) often in free text notes, but those data may be challenging to use for population health initiatives or research purposes. We evaluated the EHR-Support score designed to summarize need for social support using data from the EHR. This study included 996 women from the Pathways study, a Kaiser Permanente Northern California cohort of women diagnosed in 2005-2013 with breast cancer. This unique data resource included both EHR data and questionnaire data on patient-reported social support. Using unstructured EHR data and natural language processing, we developed 11 concept groups (items) characterizing social support. We also used structured data to create two additional concept groups. EHR-Support scores reflecting the lack of social support were generated three ways: counting the number of negative concept groups (count score), using item response theory (IRT), and converting counts to the IRT metric (converted count scores). The count scores were only associated with two of six patient-reported measures (r's: -0.004 to -0.073). The IRT score (r's: -0.038 to -0.179) and converted count score (r's: -0.032 to -0.195) were associated with five of six patient-reported measures, indicating more need for support was associated with less patient-reported social support. The EHR-Support score is a valid and feasible measure of social support that can be used for health services research and managing population health. The converted count score may provide the best balance of validity, precision from IRT and feasibility.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20396,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Population Health Management\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Population Health Management\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/19427891251383539\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Population Health Management","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/19427891251383539","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在乳腺癌中,临床医生通常在免费文本注释中将社会支持数据添加到患者电子健康记录(EHRs)中,但这些数据可能难以用于人口健康倡议或研究目的。我们利用电子病历的数据评估了电子病历支持评分,该评分旨在总结对社会支持的需求。这项研究包括来自Pathways研究的996名女性,该研究是北加州凯撒医疗机构(Kaiser Permanente)在2005年至2013年期间诊断为乳腺癌的女性队列。这一独特的数据资源包括电子病历数据和患者报告的社会支持问卷数据。利用非结构化电子病历数据和自然语言处理,我们开发了表征社会支持的11个概念组(项目)。我们还使用结构化数据创建了两个额外的概念组。反映缺乏社会支持的ehr -支持分数通过三种方式生成:计数负面概念组的数量(计数分数),使用项目反应理论(IRT),并将计数转换为IRT度量(转换计数分数)。计数得分仅与患者报告的六项措施中的两项相关(r值:-0.004至-0.073)。IRT评分(r's: -0.038至-0.179)和转换计数评分(r's: -0.032至-0.195)与六项患者报告的措施中的五项相关,表明更多的支持需求与较少的患者报告的社会支持相关。ehr -支持评分是一种有效和可行的社会支持指标,可用于卫生服务研究和人口健康管理。转换后的计数分数可以提供效度、IRT准确性和可行性的最佳平衡。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Evaluation of the Electronic Health Record-Support Social Support Score in Breast Cancer: Comparison of Count and Item Response Theory Scores.

In breast cancer, clinicians add data on social support to patient electronic health records (EHRs) often in free text notes, but those data may be challenging to use for population health initiatives or research purposes. We evaluated the EHR-Support score designed to summarize need for social support using data from the EHR. This study included 996 women from the Pathways study, a Kaiser Permanente Northern California cohort of women diagnosed in 2005-2013 with breast cancer. This unique data resource included both EHR data and questionnaire data on patient-reported social support. Using unstructured EHR data and natural language processing, we developed 11 concept groups (items) characterizing social support. We also used structured data to create two additional concept groups. EHR-Support scores reflecting the lack of social support were generated three ways: counting the number of negative concept groups (count score), using item response theory (IRT), and converting counts to the IRT metric (converted count scores). The count scores were only associated with two of six patient-reported measures (r's: -0.004 to -0.073). The IRT score (r's: -0.038 to -0.179) and converted count score (r's: -0.032 to -0.195) were associated with five of six patient-reported measures, indicating more need for support was associated with less patient-reported social support. The EHR-Support score is a valid and feasible measure of social support that can be used for health services research and managing population health. The converted count score may provide the best balance of validity, precision from IRT and feasibility.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Population Health Management
Population Health Management 医学-卫生保健
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
4.00%
发文量
81
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Population Health Management provides comprehensive, authoritative strategies for improving the systems and policies that affect health care quality, access, and outcomes, ultimately improving the health of an entire population. The Journal delivers essential research on a broad range of topics including the impact of social, cultural, economic, and environmental factors on health care systems and practices. Population Health Management coverage includes: Clinical case reports and studies on managing major public health conditions Compliance programs Health economics Outcomes assessment Provider incentives Health care reform Resource management Return on investment (ROI) Health care quality Care coordination.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信