医疗保险覆盖类型在年度健康访视中的作用:传统医疗保险与医疗保险优势计划之比较。

IF 4.2 2区 医学 Q1 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Zhang Zhang, Nancy L Schoenborn, Katherine E M Miller, Jennifer L Wolff, Daniel Polsky
{"title":"医疗保险覆盖类型在年度健康访视中的作用:传统医疗保险与医疗保险优势计划之比较。","authors":"Zhang Zhang, Nancy L Schoenborn, Katherine E M Miller, Jennifer L Wolff, Daniel Polsky","doi":"10.1007/s11606-025-09825-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The Medicare Annual Wellness Visit (AWVs) was introduced in 2011 as a preventive services visit. AWV uptake has been increasing but remains disproportionately low among vulnerable populations in Traditional Medicare (TM). However, less is known about the differential uptake of the AWV by Medicare insurance coverage type-a consequence of the increasing beneficiary enrollment shifts from TM to Medicare Advantage (MA) plans.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aims to quantify the differential effects of Medicare insurance coverage type (MA versus TM) on AWV uptake for key subpopulations.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>We used 20% nationally representative Medicare insurance claims data from 2018 to 2019. Probit models assessed the likelihood of AWV uptake, with subgroup analyses by age, race/ethnicity, dual eligibility, chronic conditions, and ADRD status.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>We included 8,799,206 Medicare beneficiaries aged 65 and older, among whom 41.2% were enrolled in MA, and 58.8% were enrolled in TM.</p><p><strong>Main measures: </strong>The outcome is whether to have an AWV; the independent variable is the Medicare insurance coverage type.</p><p><strong>Key results: </strong>Over 1/3 (37.3%) of beneficiaries received an AWV in 2019. MA enrollees were 4.3 percentage points more likely to receive an AWV than TM enrollees (p < 0.001). Subgroup analysis showed higher AWV uptake in MA across all key subgroups of interest (all p < 0.001), with the largest differences among the oldest-old adults aged above 85 + (5.6 percentage points), dual eligibles (11.5 percentage points), Black beneficiaries (8.9 percentage points), and those with ADRD (6.6 percentage points).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Enrollment in an MA plan is associated with a higher probability of AWV uptake, particularly among vulnerable populations from racial and ethnic minorities, dual eligibility, and those diagnosed with ADRD. These findings highlight MA's potential role in promoting preventive care and health equity. Future studies need to examine whether higher AWV uptake leads to improved patient outcomes in MA plans.</p>","PeriodicalId":15860,"journal":{"name":"Journal of General Internal Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Role of Medicare Insurance Coverage Type in Annual Wellness Visits: A Comparison Between Traditional Medicare and Medicare Advantage Plan.\",\"authors\":\"Zhang Zhang, Nancy L Schoenborn, Katherine E M Miller, Jennifer L Wolff, Daniel Polsky\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s11606-025-09825-8\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The Medicare Annual Wellness Visit (AWVs) was introduced in 2011 as a preventive services visit. AWV uptake has been increasing but remains disproportionately low among vulnerable populations in Traditional Medicare (TM). However, less is known about the differential uptake of the AWV by Medicare insurance coverage type-a consequence of the increasing beneficiary enrollment shifts from TM to Medicare Advantage (MA) plans.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aims to quantify the differential effects of Medicare insurance coverage type (MA versus TM) on AWV uptake for key subpopulations.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>We used 20% nationally representative Medicare insurance claims data from 2018 to 2019. Probit models assessed the likelihood of AWV uptake, with subgroup analyses by age, race/ethnicity, dual eligibility, chronic conditions, and ADRD status.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>We included 8,799,206 Medicare beneficiaries aged 65 and older, among whom 41.2% were enrolled in MA, and 58.8% were enrolled in TM.</p><p><strong>Main measures: </strong>The outcome is whether to have an AWV; the independent variable is the Medicare insurance coverage type.</p><p><strong>Key results: </strong>Over 1/3 (37.3%) of beneficiaries received an AWV in 2019. MA enrollees were 4.3 percentage points more likely to receive an AWV than TM enrollees (p < 0.001). Subgroup analysis showed higher AWV uptake in MA across all key subgroups of interest (all p < 0.001), with the largest differences among the oldest-old adults aged above 85 + (5.6 percentage points), dual eligibles (11.5 percentage points), Black beneficiaries (8.9 percentage points), and those with ADRD (6.6 percentage points).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Enrollment in an MA plan is associated with a higher probability of AWV uptake, particularly among vulnerable populations from racial and ethnic minorities, dual eligibility, and those diagnosed with ADRD. These findings highlight MA's potential role in promoting preventive care and health equity. Future studies need to examine whether higher AWV uptake leads to improved patient outcomes in MA plans.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15860,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of General Internal Medicine\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of General Internal Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-025-09825-8\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of General Internal Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-025-09825-8","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:医疗保险年度健康访问(AWVs)是在2011年引入的预防性服务访问。AWV的吸收一直在增加,但在传统医疗保险(TM)的弱势群体中仍然不成比例地低。然而,医疗保险覆盖类型对AWV的差异吸收知之甚少-这是越来越多的受益人登记从TM转向医疗保险优势(MA)计划的结果。目的:本研究旨在量化医疗保险覆盖类型(MA与TM)对关键亚群AWV吸收的差异影响。设计:我们使用了2018年至2019年具有全国代表性的20%的医疗保险索赔数据。Probit模型评估了AWV摄取的可能性,并根据年龄、种族/民族、双重资格、慢性疾病和ADRD状态进行了亚组分析。参与者:我们纳入了8799,206名65岁及以上的医疗保险受益人,其中41.2%的人参加了MA, 58.8%的人参加了TM。主要衡量标准:结果是是否有AWV;自变量为医疗保险覆盖类型。主要结果:2019年,超过三分之一(37.3%)的受益人获得了AWV。MA计划的参与者接受AWV的可能性比TM计划的参与者高4.3个百分点(p结论:MA计划的参与者接受AWV的可能性更高,特别是在来自种族和少数民族、双重资格和诊断为ADRD的弱势人群中。这些发现突出了MA在促进预防保健和卫生公平方面的潜在作用。未来的研究需要检查更高的AWV摄取是否会导致MA计划中患者预后的改善。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Role of Medicare Insurance Coverage Type in Annual Wellness Visits: A Comparison Between Traditional Medicare and Medicare Advantage Plan.

Background: The Medicare Annual Wellness Visit (AWVs) was introduced in 2011 as a preventive services visit. AWV uptake has been increasing but remains disproportionately low among vulnerable populations in Traditional Medicare (TM). However, less is known about the differential uptake of the AWV by Medicare insurance coverage type-a consequence of the increasing beneficiary enrollment shifts from TM to Medicare Advantage (MA) plans.

Objective: This study aims to quantify the differential effects of Medicare insurance coverage type (MA versus TM) on AWV uptake for key subpopulations.

Design: We used 20% nationally representative Medicare insurance claims data from 2018 to 2019. Probit models assessed the likelihood of AWV uptake, with subgroup analyses by age, race/ethnicity, dual eligibility, chronic conditions, and ADRD status.

Participants: We included 8,799,206 Medicare beneficiaries aged 65 and older, among whom 41.2% were enrolled in MA, and 58.8% were enrolled in TM.

Main measures: The outcome is whether to have an AWV; the independent variable is the Medicare insurance coverage type.

Key results: Over 1/3 (37.3%) of beneficiaries received an AWV in 2019. MA enrollees were 4.3 percentage points more likely to receive an AWV than TM enrollees (p < 0.001). Subgroup analysis showed higher AWV uptake in MA across all key subgroups of interest (all p < 0.001), with the largest differences among the oldest-old adults aged above 85 + (5.6 percentage points), dual eligibles (11.5 percentage points), Black beneficiaries (8.9 percentage points), and those with ADRD (6.6 percentage points).

Conclusion: Enrollment in an MA plan is associated with a higher probability of AWV uptake, particularly among vulnerable populations from racial and ethnic minorities, dual eligibility, and those diagnosed with ADRD. These findings highlight MA's potential role in promoting preventive care and health equity. Future studies need to examine whether higher AWV uptake leads to improved patient outcomes in MA plans.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of General Internal Medicine
Journal of General Internal Medicine 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
7.70
自引率
5.30%
发文量
749
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of General Internal Medicine is the official journal of the Society of General Internal Medicine. It promotes improved patient care, research, and education in primary care, general internal medicine, and hospital medicine. Its articles focus on topics such as clinical medicine, epidemiology, prevention, health care delivery, curriculum development, and numerous other non-traditional themes, in addition to classic clinical research on problems in internal medicine.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信