Jeffrey A. Allen, Helmar C. Lehmann, Eduardo Nobile-Orazio, Luis Querol, Yusuf A. Rajabally
{"title":"慢性炎症性脱髓鞘性多根神经病变治疗中未满足的需求。","authors":"Jeffrey A. Allen, Helmar C. Lehmann, Eduardo Nobile-Orazio, Luis Querol, Yusuf A. Rajabally","doi":"10.1111/jns.70067","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy (CIDP) is a rare acquired immune-mediated disorder affecting peripheral nerves, manifesting most commonly as symmetric, proximal, and distal weakness with sensory loss. Although the 2021 European Academy of Neurology/Peripheral Nerve Society guidelines provide evidence-based and consensus-driven approaches to the diagnosis and treatment of CIDP, challenges to optimal patient care persist. This report aims to highlight the unmet needs in CIDP management. A structured analysis of existing evidence was conducted to map gaps in CIDP care pathways, emphasizing diagnostic criteria, assessment of the therapeutic response, and disease management. Recognized key gaps and unmet needs in CIDP include (1) the absence of specific biomarkers for CIDP, (2) weighing the relative value of various CIDP metrics and interpreting what those metrics say about disease activity and treatment response, and (3) understanding the optimal timing and approach to assess treatment efficacy (or failure). There exists variability in how diagnostic and treatment guidelines are utilized, as well as how (and if) outcome metrics are utilized to guide informed treatment decisions. At least part of the confusion stems from the absence of terms commonly used during the CIDP treatment journey, including “response,” “refractory,” “remission,” and “relapse.” To address these ambiguities, a consensus-driven effort is needed to establish standardized definitions for key treatment milestones in CIDP. Harmonizing terminology will not only facilitate more accurate clinical assessments but also promote more robust and comparable research outcomes, ultimately improving the care of individuals with CIDP. This report underscores the critical unmet needs in CIDP diagnosis and management. By identifying barriers and facilitators within the current CIDP landscape, we hope to optimize clinical decision-making and focus research efforts.</p>","PeriodicalId":17451,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Peripheral Nervous System","volume":"30 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12501556/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Insight in the Unmet Needs Encountered During the Management of Chronic Inflammatory Demyelinating Polyradiculoneuropathy\",\"authors\":\"Jeffrey A. Allen, Helmar C. Lehmann, Eduardo Nobile-Orazio, Luis Querol, Yusuf A. Rajabally\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/jns.70067\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy (CIDP) is a rare acquired immune-mediated disorder affecting peripheral nerves, manifesting most commonly as symmetric, proximal, and distal weakness with sensory loss. Although the 2021 European Academy of Neurology/Peripheral Nerve Society guidelines provide evidence-based and consensus-driven approaches to the diagnosis and treatment of CIDP, challenges to optimal patient care persist. This report aims to highlight the unmet needs in CIDP management. A structured analysis of existing evidence was conducted to map gaps in CIDP care pathways, emphasizing diagnostic criteria, assessment of the therapeutic response, and disease management. Recognized key gaps and unmet needs in CIDP include (1) the absence of specific biomarkers for CIDP, (2) weighing the relative value of various CIDP metrics and interpreting what those metrics say about disease activity and treatment response, and (3) understanding the optimal timing and approach to assess treatment efficacy (or failure). There exists variability in how diagnostic and treatment guidelines are utilized, as well as how (and if) outcome metrics are utilized to guide informed treatment decisions. At least part of the confusion stems from the absence of terms commonly used during the CIDP treatment journey, including “response,” “refractory,” “remission,” and “relapse.” To address these ambiguities, a consensus-driven effort is needed to establish standardized definitions for key treatment milestones in CIDP. Harmonizing terminology will not only facilitate more accurate clinical assessments but also promote more robust and comparable research outcomes, ultimately improving the care of individuals with CIDP. This report underscores the critical unmet needs in CIDP diagnosis and management. By identifying barriers and facilitators within the current CIDP landscape, we hope to optimize clinical decision-making and focus research efforts.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":17451,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of the Peripheral Nervous System\",\"volume\":\"30 4\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12501556/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of the Peripheral Nervous System\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jns.70067\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the Peripheral Nervous System","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jns.70067","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Insight in the Unmet Needs Encountered During the Management of Chronic Inflammatory Demyelinating Polyradiculoneuropathy
Chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy (CIDP) is a rare acquired immune-mediated disorder affecting peripheral nerves, manifesting most commonly as symmetric, proximal, and distal weakness with sensory loss. Although the 2021 European Academy of Neurology/Peripheral Nerve Society guidelines provide evidence-based and consensus-driven approaches to the diagnosis and treatment of CIDP, challenges to optimal patient care persist. This report aims to highlight the unmet needs in CIDP management. A structured analysis of existing evidence was conducted to map gaps in CIDP care pathways, emphasizing diagnostic criteria, assessment of the therapeutic response, and disease management. Recognized key gaps and unmet needs in CIDP include (1) the absence of specific biomarkers for CIDP, (2) weighing the relative value of various CIDP metrics and interpreting what those metrics say about disease activity and treatment response, and (3) understanding the optimal timing and approach to assess treatment efficacy (or failure). There exists variability in how diagnostic and treatment guidelines are utilized, as well as how (and if) outcome metrics are utilized to guide informed treatment decisions. At least part of the confusion stems from the absence of terms commonly used during the CIDP treatment journey, including “response,” “refractory,” “remission,” and “relapse.” To address these ambiguities, a consensus-driven effort is needed to establish standardized definitions for key treatment milestones in CIDP. Harmonizing terminology will not only facilitate more accurate clinical assessments but also promote more robust and comparable research outcomes, ultimately improving the care of individuals with CIDP. This report underscores the critical unmet needs in CIDP diagnosis and management. By identifying barriers and facilitators within the current CIDP landscape, we hope to optimize clinical decision-making and focus research efforts.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of the Peripheral Nervous System is the official journal of the Peripheral Nerve Society. Founded in 1996, it is the scientific journal of choice for clinicians, clinical scientists and basic neuroscientists interested in all aspects of biology and clinical research of peripheral nervous system disorders.
The Journal of the Peripheral Nervous System is a peer-reviewed journal that publishes high quality articles on cell and molecular biology, genomics, neuropathic pain, clinical research, trials, and unique case reports on inherited and acquired peripheral neuropathies.
Original articles are organized according to the topic in one of four specific areas: Mechanisms of Disease, Genetics, Clinical Research, and Clinical Trials.
The journal also publishes regular review papers on hot topics and Special Issues on basic, clinical, or assembled research in the field of peripheral nervous system disorders. Authors interested in contributing a review-type article or a Special Issue should contact the Editorial Office to discuss the scope of the proposed article with the Editor-in-Chief.