外伤性脑损伤患者激动行为的药物干预:最新的系统综述。

IF 3.8 2区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Tal Klimenko, Marie-Michèle Briand, Christophe Dumais, Yorgios Alexandros Cavayas, Francis Bernard, Caroline Arbour, Lisa Burry, Marc Perreault, Marie-Julie Potvin, David Williamson
{"title":"外伤性脑损伤患者激动行为的药物干预:最新的系统综述。","authors":"Tal Klimenko, Marie-Michèle Briand, Christophe Dumais, Yorgios Alexandros Cavayas, Francis Bernard, Caroline Arbour, Lisa Burry, Marc Perreault, Marie-Julie Potvin, David Williamson","doi":"10.1177/08977151251381347","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The aim of this updated systematic review was to assess the efficacy and safety of pharmacological agents in the management of agitated behaviors following traumatic brain injury (TBI). We updated a 2019 systematic review, which originally included 21 studies, by performing a search strategy in MedLine, Embase, PsychInfo, Cinhal, Directory of Open Access Journals, and Latin American and Caribbean Literature on Health Sciences Literature (up to Jan 7<sup>th</sup>, 2025) for evidence on the risks and benefits of nine medication classes used to control agitated behaviors following TBI. We included all randomized controlled trials, quasi-experimental and observational studies examining the effects of medications administered to control agitated behaviors in TBI patients. Of the 58 studies screened in full-text, 11 additional studies were added to the 21 original studies for a total of 32 studies. Of these new studies, three studies evaluating dexmedetomidine suggested some potential benefits in reducing agitation. New studies on risperidone, olanzapine, carbamazepine, and valproic acid failed to show efficacy compared with control groups. Among studies identified in the first review, propranolol did reduce intensity of agitation but not its frequency. In conclusion, there remain insufficient data to recommend the use of any medications for the management of agitation following TBI. Dexmedetomidine may have potential benefit in an acute setting, and the benefits of antipsychotics, carbamazepine, and amantadine remain unclear. Beta-blockers and valproic have shown benefits, but results are inconsistent. More studies in the acute, rehabilitation, and outpatient settings are needed to assess the efficacy and safety of pharmacological agents for the management of agitated behaviors.</p>","PeriodicalId":16512,"journal":{"name":"Journal of neurotrauma","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Pharmacological Interventions for Agitated Behaviors in Patients with Traumatic Brain Injury: An Updated Systematic Review.\",\"authors\":\"Tal Klimenko, Marie-Michèle Briand, Christophe Dumais, Yorgios Alexandros Cavayas, Francis Bernard, Caroline Arbour, Lisa Burry, Marc Perreault, Marie-Julie Potvin, David Williamson\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/08977151251381347\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The aim of this updated systematic review was to assess the efficacy and safety of pharmacological agents in the management of agitated behaviors following traumatic brain injury (TBI). We updated a 2019 systematic review, which originally included 21 studies, by performing a search strategy in MedLine, Embase, PsychInfo, Cinhal, Directory of Open Access Journals, and Latin American and Caribbean Literature on Health Sciences Literature (up to Jan 7<sup>th</sup>, 2025) for evidence on the risks and benefits of nine medication classes used to control agitated behaviors following TBI. We included all randomized controlled trials, quasi-experimental and observational studies examining the effects of medications administered to control agitated behaviors in TBI patients. Of the 58 studies screened in full-text, 11 additional studies were added to the 21 original studies for a total of 32 studies. Of these new studies, three studies evaluating dexmedetomidine suggested some potential benefits in reducing agitation. New studies on risperidone, olanzapine, carbamazepine, and valproic acid failed to show efficacy compared with control groups. Among studies identified in the first review, propranolol did reduce intensity of agitation but not its frequency. In conclusion, there remain insufficient data to recommend the use of any medications for the management of agitation following TBI. Dexmedetomidine may have potential benefit in an acute setting, and the benefits of antipsychotics, carbamazepine, and amantadine remain unclear. Beta-blockers and valproic have shown benefits, but results are inconsistent. More studies in the acute, rehabilitation, and outpatient settings are needed to assess the efficacy and safety of pharmacological agents for the management of agitated behaviors.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16512,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of neurotrauma\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of neurotrauma\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/08977151251381347\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of neurotrauma","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/08977151251381347","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

这篇更新的系统综述的目的是评估药物治疗外伤性脑损伤(TBI)后激动行为的有效性和安全性。我们通过在MedLine、Embase、PsychInfo、Cinhal、开放获取期刊目录和拉丁美洲和加勒比健康科学文献(截至2025年1月7日)中执行搜索策略,更新了2019年的系统综述,该综述最初包括21项研究,以获取用于控制TBI后激动行为的九种药物类别的风险和益处的证据。我们纳入了所有的随机对照试验、准实验和观察性研究,这些研究检验了在TBI患者中使用药物控制激动行为的效果。在全文筛选的58项研究中,在21项原始研究的基础上又增加了11项研究,共计32项研究。在这些新研究中,评估右美托咪定的三项研究表明,右美托咪定在减少躁动方面有一些潜在的益处。与对照组相比,利培酮、奥氮平、卡马西平和丙戊酸的新研究未能显示出疗效。在第一篇综述中确定的研究中,心得安确实降低了躁动的强度,但没有降低其频率。总之,没有足够的数据来推荐使用任何药物来管理脑外伤后的躁动。右美托咪定可能对急性发作有潜在的益处,而抗精神病药、卡马西平和金刚烷胺的益处尚不清楚。受体阻滞剂和丙戊酸已显示出益处,但结果不一致。需要在急性、康复和门诊环境中进行更多的研究来评估药物治疗激动行为的有效性和安全性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Pharmacological Interventions for Agitated Behaviors in Patients with Traumatic Brain Injury: An Updated Systematic Review.

The aim of this updated systematic review was to assess the efficacy and safety of pharmacological agents in the management of agitated behaviors following traumatic brain injury (TBI). We updated a 2019 systematic review, which originally included 21 studies, by performing a search strategy in MedLine, Embase, PsychInfo, Cinhal, Directory of Open Access Journals, and Latin American and Caribbean Literature on Health Sciences Literature (up to Jan 7th, 2025) for evidence on the risks and benefits of nine medication classes used to control agitated behaviors following TBI. We included all randomized controlled trials, quasi-experimental and observational studies examining the effects of medications administered to control agitated behaviors in TBI patients. Of the 58 studies screened in full-text, 11 additional studies were added to the 21 original studies for a total of 32 studies. Of these new studies, three studies evaluating dexmedetomidine suggested some potential benefits in reducing agitation. New studies on risperidone, olanzapine, carbamazepine, and valproic acid failed to show efficacy compared with control groups. Among studies identified in the first review, propranolol did reduce intensity of agitation but not its frequency. In conclusion, there remain insufficient data to recommend the use of any medications for the management of agitation following TBI. Dexmedetomidine may have potential benefit in an acute setting, and the benefits of antipsychotics, carbamazepine, and amantadine remain unclear. Beta-blockers and valproic have shown benefits, but results are inconsistent. More studies in the acute, rehabilitation, and outpatient settings are needed to assess the efficacy and safety of pharmacological agents for the management of agitated behaviors.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of neurotrauma
Journal of neurotrauma 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
9.20
自引率
7.10%
发文量
233
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Journal of Neurotrauma is the flagship, peer-reviewed publication for reporting on the latest advances in both the clinical and laboratory investigation of traumatic brain and spinal cord injury. The Journal focuses on the basic pathobiology of injury to the central nervous system, while considering preclinical and clinical trials targeted at improving both the early management and long-term care and recovery of traumatically injured patients. This is the essential journal publishing cutting-edge basic and translational research in traumatically injured human and animal studies, with emphasis on neurodegenerative disease research linked to CNS trauma.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信