基于深度学习的活体肾供者MRI容量评估:一种预测捐献后肾功能的新工具。

IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q2 SURGERY
Dominik Thomas Koch, Felix Oliver Hofmann, Dimitrios Trompoukis, Malte Schirren, Severin Jacobi, Tobias Seibt, Stephan Kemmner, Maximilian Scheifele, Matthias Ilmer, Bernhard Renz, Jens Werner, Manfred Stangl, Markus Guba, Dionysios Koliogiannis
{"title":"基于深度学习的活体肾供者MRI容量评估:一种预测捐献后肾功能的新工具。","authors":"Dominik Thomas Koch,&nbsp;Felix Oliver Hofmann,&nbsp;Dimitrios Trompoukis,&nbsp;Malte Schirren,&nbsp;Severin Jacobi,&nbsp;Tobias Seibt,&nbsp;Stephan Kemmner,&nbsp;Maximilian Scheifele,&nbsp;Matthias Ilmer,&nbsp;Bernhard Renz,&nbsp;Jens Werner,&nbsp;Manfred Stangl,&nbsp;Markus Guba,&nbsp;Dionysios Koliogiannis","doi":"10.1111/ctr.70338","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>Living kidney donation is a crucial option for addressing the global organ shortage and providing kidney transplantation for patients suffering from end-stage kidney disease. Ensuring donor safety necessitates a comprehensive preoperative assessment of kidney anatomy and function. This study evaluates the relationship between kidney volumes derived from deep learning-based MRI volumetry, intraoperative kidney volume measurements, split renal function measured by renal scintigraphy, and post-donation eGFR. Deep learning-based MRI volumetry is hypothesized to be a reliable method with good correlation.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>This retrospective study analyzed 178 living kidney donors. Deep learning MRI volumetry-based kidney volumes were compared with intraoperative volumes of the explanted donor kidneys obtained using the water displacement method. Additionally, MRI-based volume ratios were compared with scintigraphy-based split renal function ratios to determine their ability to predict the kidney with poorer renal function and post-donation eGFR.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Deep learning-based MRI volumetry strongly correlated with intraoperatively measured kidney volumes (Pearson's correlation; <i>r</i> = 0.7671; <i>p</i> &lt; 0.0001), confirming its precision in volume estimation. Although MRI-based kidney volume ratios demonstrated only a moderate correlation with scintigraphy-based split renal function ratios (<i>r</i> = 0.4798), MRI volumetry correlated with 1-year post-donation eGFR. It tended to be better than renal scintigraphy (<i>r</i> = 0.6829 versus <i>r</i> = 0.6191).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>Deep learning-based MRI volumetry is a reliable, non-invasive tool for estimating kidney volumes in living donors, offering a radiation-free alternative for preoperative assessment. While it differs from renal scintigraphy in evaluating split renal function ratios, its correlation with post-donation eGFR tends to be better, supporting its potential role in living kidney donor assessment.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":10467,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Transplantation","volume":"39 10","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12503087/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Deep Learning-Based MRI Volumetry for Living Kidney Donor Assessment: A New Tool for Predicting Post-Donation Renal Function\",\"authors\":\"Dominik Thomas Koch,&nbsp;Felix Oliver Hofmann,&nbsp;Dimitrios Trompoukis,&nbsp;Malte Schirren,&nbsp;Severin Jacobi,&nbsp;Tobias Seibt,&nbsp;Stephan Kemmner,&nbsp;Maximilian Scheifele,&nbsp;Matthias Ilmer,&nbsp;Bernhard Renz,&nbsp;Jens Werner,&nbsp;Manfred Stangl,&nbsp;Markus Guba,&nbsp;Dionysios Koliogiannis\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/ctr.70338\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Background</h3>\\n \\n <p>Living kidney donation is a crucial option for addressing the global organ shortage and providing kidney transplantation for patients suffering from end-stage kidney disease. Ensuring donor safety necessitates a comprehensive preoperative assessment of kidney anatomy and function. This study evaluates the relationship between kidney volumes derived from deep learning-based MRI volumetry, intraoperative kidney volume measurements, split renal function measured by renal scintigraphy, and post-donation eGFR. Deep learning-based MRI volumetry is hypothesized to be a reliable method with good correlation.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>This retrospective study analyzed 178 living kidney donors. Deep learning MRI volumetry-based kidney volumes were compared with intraoperative volumes of the explanted donor kidneys obtained using the water displacement method. Additionally, MRI-based volume ratios were compared with scintigraphy-based split renal function ratios to determine their ability to predict the kidney with poorer renal function and post-donation eGFR.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>Deep learning-based MRI volumetry strongly correlated with intraoperatively measured kidney volumes (Pearson's correlation; <i>r</i> = 0.7671; <i>p</i> &lt; 0.0001), confirming its precision in volume estimation. Although MRI-based kidney volume ratios demonstrated only a moderate correlation with scintigraphy-based split renal function ratios (<i>r</i> = 0.4798), MRI volumetry correlated with 1-year post-donation eGFR. It tended to be better than renal scintigraphy (<i>r</i> = 0.6829 versus <i>r</i> = 0.6191).</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\\n \\n <p>Deep learning-based MRI volumetry is a reliable, non-invasive tool for estimating kidney volumes in living donors, offering a radiation-free alternative for preoperative assessment. While it differs from renal scintigraphy in evaluating split renal function ratios, its correlation with post-donation eGFR tends to be better, supporting its potential role in living kidney donor assessment.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10467,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical Transplantation\",\"volume\":\"39 10\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12503087/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical Transplantation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ctr.70338\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Transplantation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ctr.70338","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:活体肾脏捐献是解决全球器官短缺和为终末期肾脏疾病患者提供肾脏移植的关键选择。确保供体安全需要对肾脏解剖和功能进行全面的术前评估。本研究评估了基于深度学习的MRI体积测量、术中肾脏体积测量、肾闪烁成像测量的分裂肾功能和捐献后eGFR之间的关系。基于深度学习的MRI体积测量被认为是一种可靠的方法,具有良好的相关性。方法:回顾性分析178例活体肾供者。将基于深度学习MRI体积的肾脏体积与用水置换法获得的移植供肾的术中体积进行比较。此外,将基于mri的体积比与基于闪烁成像的分裂肾功能比进行比较,以确定其预测肾功能较差肾脏和捐献后eGFR的能力。结果:基于深度学习的MRI体积测量与术中测量的肾脏体积密切相关(Pearson相关;r = 0.7671; p)结论:基于深度学习的MRI体积测量是一种可靠的、无创的评估活体供体肾脏体积的工具,为术前评估提供了一种无辐射的替代方法。虽然它在评估分裂肾功能比率方面与肾显像不同,但它与捐献后eGFR的相关性往往更好,这支持了它在评估活体肾供者中的潜在作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Deep Learning-Based MRI Volumetry for Living Kidney Donor Assessment: A New Tool for Predicting Post-Donation Renal Function

Deep Learning-Based MRI Volumetry for Living Kidney Donor Assessment: A New Tool for Predicting Post-Donation Renal Function

Background

Living kidney donation is a crucial option for addressing the global organ shortage and providing kidney transplantation for patients suffering from end-stage kidney disease. Ensuring donor safety necessitates a comprehensive preoperative assessment of kidney anatomy and function. This study evaluates the relationship between kidney volumes derived from deep learning-based MRI volumetry, intraoperative kidney volume measurements, split renal function measured by renal scintigraphy, and post-donation eGFR. Deep learning-based MRI volumetry is hypothesized to be a reliable method with good correlation.

Methods

This retrospective study analyzed 178 living kidney donors. Deep learning MRI volumetry-based kidney volumes were compared with intraoperative volumes of the explanted donor kidneys obtained using the water displacement method. Additionally, MRI-based volume ratios were compared with scintigraphy-based split renal function ratios to determine their ability to predict the kidney with poorer renal function and post-donation eGFR.

Results

Deep learning-based MRI volumetry strongly correlated with intraoperatively measured kidney volumes (Pearson's correlation; r = 0.7671; p < 0.0001), confirming its precision in volume estimation. Although MRI-based kidney volume ratios demonstrated only a moderate correlation with scintigraphy-based split renal function ratios (r = 0.4798), MRI volumetry correlated with 1-year post-donation eGFR. It tended to be better than renal scintigraphy (r = 0.6829 versus r = 0.6191).

Conclusion

Deep learning-based MRI volumetry is a reliable, non-invasive tool for estimating kidney volumes in living donors, offering a radiation-free alternative for preoperative assessment. While it differs from renal scintigraphy in evaluating split renal function ratios, its correlation with post-donation eGFR tends to be better, supporting its potential role in living kidney donor assessment.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Clinical Transplantation
Clinical Transplantation 医学-外科
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
4.80%
发文量
286
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Clinical Transplantation: The Journal of Clinical and Translational Research aims to serve as a channel of rapid communication for all those involved in the care of patients who require, or have had, organ or tissue transplants, including: kidney, intestine, liver, pancreas, islets, heart, heart valves, lung, bone marrow, cornea, skin, bone, and cartilage, viable or stored. Published monthly, Clinical Transplantation’s scope is focused on the complete spectrum of present transplant therapies, as well as also those that are experimental or may become possible in future. Topics include: Immunology and immunosuppression; Patient preparation; Social, ethical, and psychological issues; Complications, short- and long-term results; Artificial organs; Donation and preservation of organ and tissue; Translational studies; Advances in tissue typing; Updates on transplant pathology;. Clinical and translational studies are particularly welcome, as well as focused reviews. Full-length papers and short communications are invited. Clinical reviews are encouraged, as well as seminal papers in basic science which might lead to immediate clinical application. Prominence is regularly given to the results of cooperative surveys conducted by the organ and tissue transplant registries. Clinical Transplantation: The Journal of Clinical and Translational Research is essential reading for clinicians and researchers in the diverse field of transplantation: surgeons; clinical immunologists; cryobiologists; hematologists; gastroenterologists; hepatologists; pulmonologists; nephrologists; cardiologists; and endocrinologists. It will also be of interest to sociologists, psychologists, research workers, and to all health professionals whose combined efforts will improve the prognosis of transplant recipients.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信