用Catboost在最短的处理时间内增强糖尿病预测:一项比较研究。

IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q3 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
M Sumathi, S Sahana, S Sri Raja Rajeswari, V Kruthi, S P Raja
{"title":"用Catboost在最短的处理时间内增强糖尿病预测:一项比较研究。","authors":"M Sumathi, S Sahana, S Sri Raja Rajeswari, V Kruthi, S P Raja","doi":"10.1111/jep.70284","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Diabetes mellitus is a chronic disease that presents significant health challenges worldwide. Accurate diabetes prediction facilitates early intervention and personalized healthcare strategies, thereby improving patient care and reducing healthcare processing costs. Ensemble-based machine learning (ML) methods enhance predictive performance.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>This study explores various ML classifiers, both individually and in ensemble configurations, including decision trees, random forests, k-nearest neighbors, Naive Bayes, AdaBoost (AB), XGBoost (XB), and multilayer perceptron (MLP) for prediction. The performance of each method is evaluated through rigorous experimentation and comparative analysis across multiple aspects.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The performance of the best ML model, MLP, is compared with that of the proposed CatBoost classifier and the ensemble model to identify the most effective approach for diabetes prediction in minimal duration. The proposed CatBoost classifier's execution time of 4.27 s, which is approximately 98.64% faster than the ensemble model's 314.96 s. This demonstrates CatBoost's significant advantage in computational efficiency over ensemble-based classifiers.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>By leveraging the diverse and complementary strengths of ML classifiers, this study contributes to the advancement of precision medicine and personalized healthcare for individuals at risk of diabetes.</p>","PeriodicalId":15997,"journal":{"name":"Journal of evaluation in clinical practice","volume":"31 7","pages":"e70284"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Enhancing Diabetes Prediction With Minimal Processing Time Using Catboost: A Comparative Study.\",\"authors\":\"M Sumathi, S Sahana, S Sri Raja Rajeswari, V Kruthi, S P Raja\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/jep.70284\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Diabetes mellitus is a chronic disease that presents significant health challenges worldwide. Accurate diabetes prediction facilitates early intervention and personalized healthcare strategies, thereby improving patient care and reducing healthcare processing costs. Ensemble-based machine learning (ML) methods enhance predictive performance.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>This study explores various ML classifiers, both individually and in ensemble configurations, including decision trees, random forests, k-nearest neighbors, Naive Bayes, AdaBoost (AB), XGBoost (XB), and multilayer perceptron (MLP) for prediction. The performance of each method is evaluated through rigorous experimentation and comparative analysis across multiple aspects.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The performance of the best ML model, MLP, is compared with that of the proposed CatBoost classifier and the ensemble model to identify the most effective approach for diabetes prediction in minimal duration. The proposed CatBoost classifier's execution time of 4.27 s, which is approximately 98.64% faster than the ensemble model's 314.96 s. This demonstrates CatBoost's significant advantage in computational efficiency over ensemble-based classifiers.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>By leveraging the diverse and complementary strengths of ML classifiers, this study contributes to the advancement of precision medicine and personalized healthcare for individuals at risk of diabetes.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15997,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of evaluation in clinical practice\",\"volume\":\"31 7\",\"pages\":\"e70284\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of evaluation in clinical practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/jep.70284\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of evaluation in clinical practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/jep.70284","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:糖尿病是一种慢性疾病,在世界范围内提出了重大的健康挑战。准确的糖尿病预测有助于早期干预和个性化医疗保健策略,从而改善患者护理并降低医疗保健处理成本。基于集成的机器学习(ML)方法提高了预测性能。方法:本研究探索了各种机器学习分类器,包括单独和集成配置,包括决策树,随机森林,k近邻,朴素贝叶斯,AdaBoost (AB), XGBoost (XB)和多层感知器(MLP)用于预测。通过严格的实验和跨多个方面的比较分析来评估每种方法的性能。结果:将最佳ML模型MLP的性能与所提出的CatBoost分类器和集成模型的性能进行比较,以确定在最短时间内预测糖尿病的最有效方法。所提出的CatBoost分类器的执行时间为4.27 s,比集成模型的314.96 s快了约98.64%。这表明CatBoost在计算效率上比基于集成的分类器有显著的优势。结论:通过利用ML分类器的多样性和互补性优势,本研究有助于推进糖尿病高危人群的精准医疗和个性化医疗。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Enhancing Diabetes Prediction With Minimal Processing Time Using Catboost: A Comparative Study.

Objective: Diabetes mellitus is a chronic disease that presents significant health challenges worldwide. Accurate diabetes prediction facilitates early intervention and personalized healthcare strategies, thereby improving patient care and reducing healthcare processing costs. Ensemble-based machine learning (ML) methods enhance predictive performance.

Method: This study explores various ML classifiers, both individually and in ensemble configurations, including decision trees, random forests, k-nearest neighbors, Naive Bayes, AdaBoost (AB), XGBoost (XB), and multilayer perceptron (MLP) for prediction. The performance of each method is evaluated through rigorous experimentation and comparative analysis across multiple aspects.

Results: The performance of the best ML model, MLP, is compared with that of the proposed CatBoost classifier and the ensemble model to identify the most effective approach for diabetes prediction in minimal duration. The proposed CatBoost classifier's execution time of 4.27 s, which is approximately 98.64% faster than the ensemble model's 314.96 s. This demonstrates CatBoost's significant advantage in computational efficiency over ensemble-based classifiers.

Conclusion: By leveraging the diverse and complementary strengths of ML classifiers, this study contributes to the advancement of precision medicine and personalized healthcare for individuals at risk of diabetes.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
4.20%
发文量
143
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice aims to promote the evaluation and development of clinical practice across medicine, nursing and the allied health professions. All aspects of health services research and public health policy analysis and debate are of interest to the Journal whether studied from a population-based or individual patient-centred perspective. Of particular interest to the Journal are submissions on all aspects of clinical effectiveness and efficiency including evidence-based medicine, clinical practice guidelines, clinical decision making, clinical services organisation, implementation and delivery, health economic evaluation, health process and outcome measurement and new or improved methods (conceptual and statistical) for systematic inquiry into clinical practice. Papers may take a classical quantitative or qualitative approach to investigation (or may utilise both techniques) or may take the form of learned essays, structured/systematic reviews and critiques.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信