链球菌性心内膜炎:物种依赖风险的荟萃分析。

IF 10 1区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
EClinicalMedicine Pub Date : 2025-08-25 eCollection Date: 2025-09-01 DOI:10.1016/j.eclinm.2025.103425
Gavin Deas, Todd C Lee, Julia Colston, Mahableshwar Albur, Julia Vasant, Angela H Nobbs, Philip Williams, Fergus Hamilton
{"title":"链球菌性心内膜炎:物种依赖风险的荟萃分析。","authors":"Gavin Deas, Todd C Lee, Julia Colston, Mahableshwar Albur, Julia Vasant, Angela H Nobbs, Philip Williams, Fergus Hamilton","doi":"10.1016/j.eclinm.2025.103425","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Streptococcal infective endocarditis (IE) is a devastating disease. In international guidance, the risk of IE from streptococci is considered the same regardless of species (excluding <i>Streptococcus pyogenes</i> and <i>Streptococcus pneumoniae</i>). However, the idea of homogenous risk has been recently questioned. We aimed to evaluate the risk of IE across streptococcal species through meta-analysis of other published works and our own local data.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We first conducted a scoping review for publications that reported cases of streptococcal bacteraemia differentiated by species and estimated the risk of IE between 1994 and October 2024. Then we supplemented this data with our own laboratory data from four large hospitals. We meta-analysed the risk of IE. Two sensitivity analyses were performed to deal with one manuscript which excluded cultures considered as contaminants: first, by excluding that publication, and second by adjusting for blood culture contamination using our local estimated contamination rates.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>Four studies met inclusion criteria comprising a total of 14,183 isolates with 1028 endocarditis cases (7.25% absolute risk of IE). The highest risk species were: <i>Streptococcus mutans</i>: 47% (95% CI 38-56%), <i>Streptococcus cristatus</i>: 41% (95% CI 21-62%), <i>Streptococcus gordonii</i>: 37% (95% CI 30-44%), <i>Streptococcus sanguinis</i> 33% (95% CI 28-39%), and <i>Streptococcus gallolyticus</i>: 31% (95% CI 27-36%). Combined, these species accounted for only 8.4% of bacteraemias but 38.6% of IE. The most common IE pathogen overall was <i>Streptococcus mitis/oralis</i> (23.6% of IE, 8% of bacteraemias) but these infections themselves only carried an IE risk of 12% (95% CI 11-13%). There was strong evidence of heterogeneity detected in <i>S. mitis/oralis</i> (I<sup>2</sup> 87%; Cochran's Q: 30 p: <0.001) and <i>S. gallolyticus</i> (I<sup>2</sup> 90%; Q: 29 p: <0.001).</p><p><strong>Interpretation: </strong>The 'small five' streptococci: <i>S. mutans, S. cristatus, S. gordonii, S. gallolyticus,</i> and <i>S. sanguinis</i> account for only 8% of all streptococcal bloodstream infections but nearly 40% of all streptococcal IE with a risk of IE in individual infections as high as ∼50%. The risk of <i>S. mitis/oralis</i> appears heterogeneous, may depend on species or subspecies, and requires further study.</p><p><strong>Funding: </strong>FH was funded by the NIHR Clinical Lectureship Scheme. TL has salary support from Fonds de Recherche Québec - Santé. PW is funded by a Medical Research Council grant MR/T005408/1.</p>","PeriodicalId":11393,"journal":{"name":"EClinicalMedicine","volume":"87 ","pages":"103425"},"PeriodicalIF":10.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12496199/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Streptococcal endocarditis: a meta-analysis of species dependant risk.\",\"authors\":\"Gavin Deas, Todd C Lee, Julia Colston, Mahableshwar Albur, Julia Vasant, Angela H Nobbs, Philip Williams, Fergus Hamilton\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.eclinm.2025.103425\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Streptococcal infective endocarditis (IE) is a devastating disease. In international guidance, the risk of IE from streptococci is considered the same regardless of species (excluding <i>Streptococcus pyogenes</i> and <i>Streptococcus pneumoniae</i>). However, the idea of homogenous risk has been recently questioned. We aimed to evaluate the risk of IE across streptococcal species through meta-analysis of other published works and our own local data.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We first conducted a scoping review for publications that reported cases of streptococcal bacteraemia differentiated by species and estimated the risk of IE between 1994 and October 2024. Then we supplemented this data with our own laboratory data from four large hospitals. We meta-analysed the risk of IE. Two sensitivity analyses were performed to deal with one manuscript which excluded cultures considered as contaminants: first, by excluding that publication, and second by adjusting for blood culture contamination using our local estimated contamination rates.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>Four studies met inclusion criteria comprising a total of 14,183 isolates with 1028 endocarditis cases (7.25% absolute risk of IE). The highest risk species were: <i>Streptococcus mutans</i>: 47% (95% CI 38-56%), <i>Streptococcus cristatus</i>: 41% (95% CI 21-62%), <i>Streptococcus gordonii</i>: 37% (95% CI 30-44%), <i>Streptococcus sanguinis</i> 33% (95% CI 28-39%), and <i>Streptococcus gallolyticus</i>: 31% (95% CI 27-36%). Combined, these species accounted for only 8.4% of bacteraemias but 38.6% of IE. The most common IE pathogen overall was <i>Streptococcus mitis/oralis</i> (23.6% of IE, 8% of bacteraemias) but these infections themselves only carried an IE risk of 12% (95% CI 11-13%). There was strong evidence of heterogeneity detected in <i>S. mitis/oralis</i> (I<sup>2</sup> 87%; Cochran's Q: 30 p: <0.001) and <i>S. gallolyticus</i> (I<sup>2</sup> 90%; Q: 29 p: <0.001).</p><p><strong>Interpretation: </strong>The 'small five' streptococci: <i>S. mutans, S. cristatus, S. gordonii, S. gallolyticus,</i> and <i>S. sanguinis</i> account for only 8% of all streptococcal bloodstream infections but nearly 40% of all streptococcal IE with a risk of IE in individual infections as high as ∼50%. The risk of <i>S. mitis/oralis</i> appears heterogeneous, may depend on species or subspecies, and requires further study.</p><p><strong>Funding: </strong>FH was funded by the NIHR Clinical Lectureship Scheme. TL has salary support from Fonds de Recherche Québec - Santé. PW is funded by a Medical Research Council grant MR/T005408/1.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11393,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"EClinicalMedicine\",\"volume\":\"87 \",\"pages\":\"103425\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":10.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12496199/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"EClinicalMedicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eclinm.2025.103425\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/9/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"EClinicalMedicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eclinm.2025.103425","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/9/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:链球菌感染性心内膜炎(IE)是一种毁灭性疾病。在国际指导中,无论何种链球菌(不包括化脓性链球菌和肺炎链球菌)引起IE的风险被认为是相同的。然而,同质风险的概念最近受到了质疑。我们的目的是通过对其他已发表的研究和我们自己的本地数据进行荟萃分析,评估不同链球菌种类的IE风险。方法:我们首先对1994年至2024年10月期间报告的不同种类链球菌菌血症病例的出版物进行了范围综述,并估计了IE的风险。然后我们用来自四家大医院的实验室数据来补充这些数据。我们荟萃分析了IE的风险。对一篇排除了被认为是污染物的培养物的手稿进行了两次敏感性分析:首先,通过排除该出版物,第二,通过使用我们当地估计的污染率调整血液培养物污染。结果:4项研究符合纳入标准,共纳入14183例分离物,1028例心内膜炎病例(IE绝对风险7.25%)。最高危险种为:变形链球菌:47% (95% CI 38-56%),冠状链球菌:41% (95% CI 21-62%),戈登链球菌:37% (95% CI 30-44%),血链球菌33% (95% CI 28-39%),溶胆链球菌:31% (95% CI 27-36%)。加起来,这些菌种仅占菌血症的8.4%,但占IE的38.6%。总体而言,最常见的IE病原体是链球菌/口腔炎(占IE的23.6%,占菌血症的8%),但这些感染本身仅具有12%的IE风险(95% CI 11-13%)。有强有力的证据表明,在密链球菌/口链球菌中检测到异质性(I2 87%; Cochran的Q: 30 p:溶胆链球菌(I2 90%; Q: 29 p:解释:“小五”链球菌:变形链球菌、cristatus链球菌、gordonii链球菌、溶胆链球菌和血链球菌仅占所有链球菌血液感染的8%,但占所有链球菌IE的近40%,个体感染的IE风险高达50%。唇形链球菌/口腔链球菌的风险呈现异质性,可能取决于物种或亚种,需要进一步研究。资助:FH由NIHR临床讲师计划资助。TL的薪金由quacimac - sant基金会提供。PW由医学研究理事会拨款MR/T005408/1资助。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Streptococcal endocarditis: a meta-analysis of species dependant risk.

Streptococcal endocarditis: a meta-analysis of species dependant risk.

Streptococcal endocarditis: a meta-analysis of species dependant risk.

Streptococcal endocarditis: a meta-analysis of species dependant risk.

Background: Streptococcal infective endocarditis (IE) is a devastating disease. In international guidance, the risk of IE from streptococci is considered the same regardless of species (excluding Streptococcus pyogenes and Streptococcus pneumoniae). However, the idea of homogenous risk has been recently questioned. We aimed to evaluate the risk of IE across streptococcal species through meta-analysis of other published works and our own local data.

Methods: We first conducted a scoping review for publications that reported cases of streptococcal bacteraemia differentiated by species and estimated the risk of IE between 1994 and October 2024. Then we supplemented this data with our own laboratory data from four large hospitals. We meta-analysed the risk of IE. Two sensitivity analyses were performed to deal with one manuscript which excluded cultures considered as contaminants: first, by excluding that publication, and second by adjusting for blood culture contamination using our local estimated contamination rates.

Findings: Four studies met inclusion criteria comprising a total of 14,183 isolates with 1028 endocarditis cases (7.25% absolute risk of IE). The highest risk species were: Streptococcus mutans: 47% (95% CI 38-56%), Streptococcus cristatus: 41% (95% CI 21-62%), Streptococcus gordonii: 37% (95% CI 30-44%), Streptococcus sanguinis 33% (95% CI 28-39%), and Streptococcus gallolyticus: 31% (95% CI 27-36%). Combined, these species accounted for only 8.4% of bacteraemias but 38.6% of IE. The most common IE pathogen overall was Streptococcus mitis/oralis (23.6% of IE, 8% of bacteraemias) but these infections themselves only carried an IE risk of 12% (95% CI 11-13%). There was strong evidence of heterogeneity detected in S. mitis/oralis (I2 87%; Cochran's Q: 30 p: <0.001) and S. gallolyticus (I2 90%; Q: 29 p: <0.001).

Interpretation: The 'small five' streptococci: S. mutans, S. cristatus, S. gordonii, S. gallolyticus, and S. sanguinis account for only 8% of all streptococcal bloodstream infections but nearly 40% of all streptococcal IE with a risk of IE in individual infections as high as ∼50%. The risk of S. mitis/oralis appears heterogeneous, may depend on species or subspecies, and requires further study.

Funding: FH was funded by the NIHR Clinical Lectureship Scheme. TL has salary support from Fonds de Recherche Québec - Santé. PW is funded by a Medical Research Council grant MR/T005408/1.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
EClinicalMedicine
EClinicalMedicine Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
18.90
自引率
1.30%
发文量
506
审稿时长
22 days
期刊介绍: eClinicalMedicine is a gold open-access clinical journal designed to support frontline health professionals in addressing the complex and rapid health transitions affecting societies globally. The journal aims to assist practitioners in overcoming healthcare challenges across diverse communities, spanning diagnosis, treatment, prevention, and health promotion. Integrating disciplines from various specialties and life stages, it seeks to enhance health systems as fundamental institutions within societies. With a forward-thinking approach, eClinicalMedicine aims to redefine the future of healthcare.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信