使疟疾控制干预措施适合当地情况:通过Plus项目共同设计长期疟疾化学预防(PMC)规划。

IF 6.1 2区 医学 Q1 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Meredith Center, Alba Luna McGirr, Malia Skjefte, Lilly Claire Ekobika, Hans Bahibo, Elsa Nhantumbo, Bienvenu Wakpo, Aurore Ogouyemi Hounto, Colette Yah Kokrasset, Baltazar Candrinho, Kathryn Malhotra, Sian E Clarke, Roly Daniel Gosling, Jacques Kouakou
{"title":"使疟疾控制干预措施适合当地情况:通过Plus项目共同设计长期疟疾化学预防(PMC)规划。","authors":"Meredith Center, Alba Luna McGirr, Malia Skjefte, Lilly Claire Ekobika, Hans Bahibo, Elsa Nhantumbo, Bienvenu Wakpo, Aurore Ogouyemi Hounto, Colette Yah Kokrasset, Baltazar Candrinho, Kathryn Malhotra, Sian E Clarke, Roly Daniel Gosling, Jacques Kouakou","doi":"10.1136/bmjgh-2024-015207","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>With global malaria cases on the rise, the WHO has placed increased emphasis on National Malaria Programmes to tailor interventions to country and programmatic needs. This paper presents the Plus Project's experience of applying a codesign approach to design country-specific models of perennial malaria chemoprevention (PMC), a chemoprevention intervention aimed at reducing morbidity and mortality due to malaria and anaemia in children. Codesign workshops were held in each of the project's focus countries (Benin, Cameroon, Côte d'Ivoire and Mozambique) with the primary objective of designing the country-specific PMC model. The three-and-a-half-day workshops were adapted to each country's context and included stakeholders from national and subnational malaria, immunisation and child health programmes, as well as national and international development partners and research institutions. The meetings were iterative and collaborative, harnessing a variety of participatory methods including journey mapping and surveys to reach group consensus on the PMC models best suited to each country's specific context. The Plus Project's codesign approach resulted in four different PMC strategies, with a range from four to eight contact points and different codelivery interventions, each taking advantage of country-specific health system delivery platforms, operational logistics and political contexts. This collaborative, codesign process also helped gather additional programmatic insights to aid PMC implementation while providing an opportunity to increase stakeholder buy-in. With an emphasis on collaborative decision-making, the learnings collected through these workshops can be applied to a variety of programmatic applications, extending beyond malaria.</p>","PeriodicalId":9137,"journal":{"name":"BMJ Global Health","volume":"10 10","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12506191/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Tailoring malaria control interventions to suit local context: codesign of perennial malaria chemoprevention (PMC) programmes through the Plus Project.\",\"authors\":\"Meredith Center, Alba Luna McGirr, Malia Skjefte, Lilly Claire Ekobika, Hans Bahibo, Elsa Nhantumbo, Bienvenu Wakpo, Aurore Ogouyemi Hounto, Colette Yah Kokrasset, Baltazar Candrinho, Kathryn Malhotra, Sian E Clarke, Roly Daniel Gosling, Jacques Kouakou\",\"doi\":\"10.1136/bmjgh-2024-015207\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>With global malaria cases on the rise, the WHO has placed increased emphasis on National Malaria Programmes to tailor interventions to country and programmatic needs. This paper presents the Plus Project's experience of applying a codesign approach to design country-specific models of perennial malaria chemoprevention (PMC), a chemoprevention intervention aimed at reducing morbidity and mortality due to malaria and anaemia in children. Codesign workshops were held in each of the project's focus countries (Benin, Cameroon, Côte d'Ivoire and Mozambique) with the primary objective of designing the country-specific PMC model. The three-and-a-half-day workshops were adapted to each country's context and included stakeholders from national and subnational malaria, immunisation and child health programmes, as well as national and international development partners and research institutions. The meetings were iterative and collaborative, harnessing a variety of participatory methods including journey mapping and surveys to reach group consensus on the PMC models best suited to each country's specific context. The Plus Project's codesign approach resulted in four different PMC strategies, with a range from four to eight contact points and different codelivery interventions, each taking advantage of country-specific health system delivery platforms, operational logistics and political contexts. This collaborative, codesign process also helped gather additional programmatic insights to aid PMC implementation while providing an opportunity to increase stakeholder buy-in. With an emphasis on collaborative decision-making, the learnings collected through these workshops can be applied to a variety of programmatic applications, extending beyond malaria.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9137,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BMJ Global Health\",\"volume\":\"10 10\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12506191/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BMJ Global Health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjgh-2024-015207\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMJ Global Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjgh-2024-015207","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

随着全球疟疾病例的增加,世卫组织更加强调国家疟疾规划,使干预措施符合国家和规划的需要。本文介绍了Plus项目应用协同设计方法设计针对国别的长期疟疾化学预防(PMC)模式的经验。PMC是一种化学预防干预,旨在降低儿童疟疾和贫血的发病率和死亡率。在项目的每个重点国家(贝宁、喀麦隆、Côte科特迪瓦和莫桑比克)举办了共同设计讲习班,主要目标是设计针对具体国家的PMC模式。为期三天半的讲习班根据每个国家的情况进行了调整,与会者包括来自国家和国家以下各级疟疾、免疫和儿童保健方案的利益攸关方,以及国家和国际发展伙伴和研究机构。这些会议是反复进行和协作的,利用各种参与性方法,包括旅程绘图和调查,就最适合每个国家具体情况的PMC模式达成小组共识。Plus项目的共同设计方法产生了四种不同的PMC战略,其中包括4至8个接触点和不同的共同交付干预措施,每一项都利用了针对具体国家的卫生系统交付平台、业务后勤和政治背景。这种协作的共同设计过程还有助于收集额外的程序性见解,以帮助PMC实现,同时提供增加利益相关者参与的机会。在强调协作决策的情况下,通过这些讲习班收集的经验可以应用于各种规划应用,而不仅仅是疟疾。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Tailoring malaria control interventions to suit local context: codesign of perennial malaria chemoprevention (PMC) programmes through the Plus Project.

Tailoring malaria control interventions to suit local context: codesign of perennial malaria chemoprevention (PMC) programmes through the Plus Project.

Tailoring malaria control interventions to suit local context: codesign of perennial malaria chemoprevention (PMC) programmes through the Plus Project.

Tailoring malaria control interventions to suit local context: codesign of perennial malaria chemoprevention (PMC) programmes through the Plus Project.

With global malaria cases on the rise, the WHO has placed increased emphasis on National Malaria Programmes to tailor interventions to country and programmatic needs. This paper presents the Plus Project's experience of applying a codesign approach to design country-specific models of perennial malaria chemoprevention (PMC), a chemoprevention intervention aimed at reducing morbidity and mortality due to malaria and anaemia in children. Codesign workshops were held in each of the project's focus countries (Benin, Cameroon, Côte d'Ivoire and Mozambique) with the primary objective of designing the country-specific PMC model. The three-and-a-half-day workshops were adapted to each country's context and included stakeholders from national and subnational malaria, immunisation and child health programmes, as well as national and international development partners and research institutions. The meetings were iterative and collaborative, harnessing a variety of participatory methods including journey mapping and surveys to reach group consensus on the PMC models best suited to each country's specific context. The Plus Project's codesign approach resulted in four different PMC strategies, with a range from four to eight contact points and different codelivery interventions, each taking advantage of country-specific health system delivery platforms, operational logistics and political contexts. This collaborative, codesign process also helped gather additional programmatic insights to aid PMC implementation while providing an opportunity to increase stakeholder buy-in. With an emphasis on collaborative decision-making, the learnings collected through these workshops can be applied to a variety of programmatic applications, extending beyond malaria.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
BMJ Global Health
BMJ Global Health Medicine-Health Policy
CiteScore
11.40
自引率
4.90%
发文量
429
审稿时长
18 weeks
期刊介绍: BMJ Global Health is an online Open Access journal from BMJ that focuses on publishing high-quality peer-reviewed content pertinent to individuals engaged in global health, including policy makers, funders, researchers, clinicians, and frontline healthcare workers. The journal encompasses all facets of global health, with a special emphasis on submissions addressing underfunded areas such as non-communicable diseases (NCDs). It welcomes research across all study phases and designs, from study protocols to phase I trials to meta-analyses, including small or specialized studies. The journal also encourages opinionated discussions on controversial topics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信