评估高危未确诊HFpEF患者强化降压对心血管的益处。

IF 3.7 2区 医学 Q2 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Xinru Liu, Zhiyan Wang, Chang Hua, Yanfang Wu, Yangyang Tang, Yuling Xiong, Jingwei Liu, Jiaqi Zhang, Qiang Lv, Chao Jiang, Jianzeng Dong, Xin Du
{"title":"评估高危未确诊HFpEF患者强化降压对心血管的益处。","authors":"Xinru Liu, Zhiyan Wang, Chang Hua, Yanfang Wu, Yangyang Tang, Yuling Xiong, Jingwei Liu, Jiaqi Zhang, Qiang Lv, Chao Jiang, Jianzeng Dong, Xin Du","doi":"10.1002/ehf2.15435","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) is often underdiagnosed. This study evaluates the HFpEF-ABA score's ability to identify high-risk, undiagnosed HFpEF subgroups with elevated cardiovascular event rates and assesses the impact of intensive blood pressure control in these populations.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A post-hoc analysis of the Systolic Blood Pressure Intervention Trial (SPRINT) was performed. The HFpEF-ABA score identified high-risk individuals with undiagnosed HFpEF. Cox proportional hazards regression was used to examine interactions between HFpEF-ABA score groups and intensive blood pressure control on major cardiovascular outcomes. The primary outcome was a composite of myocardial infarction (MI), acute coronary syndrome not resulting in MI, stroke, acute decompensated heart failure and cardiovascular disease death.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 9265 patients (mean age, 67.9 ± 9.4 years; 35.5% females), 559 primary outcomes occurred during a median follow-up of 3.2 years. An HFpEF-ABA score ≥ 90% was associated with a higher risk of the primary outcome [adjusted hazard ratio (aHR), 1.96 (1.57-2.44); P < 0.001]. When treated as a continuous variable, higher HFpEF-ABA scores were independently associated with an increased risk of the primary composite outcome (P = 0.001), with a modest non-linear relationship observed (P for non-linearity = 0.040). In the intensive treatment group, the absolute reduction in primary outcomes was 5.0 per 1000 patient-years for scores < 90% and 11.2 per 1000 patient-years for ≥ 90%. Intensive blood pressure control reduced primary outcomes in both groups [<90%: aHR, 0.75 (0.62-0.90); ≥90%: aHR, 0.76 (0.51-1.13)] with no significant heterogeneity (P for interaction = 0.944). Serious adverse events did not increase in either group [<90%: aHR, 1.04 (0.96-1.11); ≥90%: aHR, 1.06 (0.88-1.28); P for interaction = 0.801].</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The HFpEF-ABA score identifies high-risk patients with undiagnosed HFpEF who have elevated cardiovascular event rates and benefit from intensive blood pressure control without an increased risk of serious adverse events.</p>","PeriodicalId":11864,"journal":{"name":"ESC Heart Failure","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Assessing cardiovascular benefits of intensive blood pressure lowering in high-risk undiagnosed HFpEF patients.\",\"authors\":\"Xinru Liu, Zhiyan Wang, Chang Hua, Yanfang Wu, Yangyang Tang, Yuling Xiong, Jingwei Liu, Jiaqi Zhang, Qiang Lv, Chao Jiang, Jianzeng Dong, Xin Du\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/ehf2.15435\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) is often underdiagnosed. This study evaluates the HFpEF-ABA score's ability to identify high-risk, undiagnosed HFpEF subgroups with elevated cardiovascular event rates and assesses the impact of intensive blood pressure control in these populations.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A post-hoc analysis of the Systolic Blood Pressure Intervention Trial (SPRINT) was performed. The HFpEF-ABA score identified high-risk individuals with undiagnosed HFpEF. Cox proportional hazards regression was used to examine interactions between HFpEF-ABA score groups and intensive blood pressure control on major cardiovascular outcomes. The primary outcome was a composite of myocardial infarction (MI), acute coronary syndrome not resulting in MI, stroke, acute decompensated heart failure and cardiovascular disease death.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 9265 patients (mean age, 67.9 ± 9.4 years; 35.5% females), 559 primary outcomes occurred during a median follow-up of 3.2 years. An HFpEF-ABA score ≥ 90% was associated with a higher risk of the primary outcome [adjusted hazard ratio (aHR), 1.96 (1.57-2.44); P < 0.001]. When treated as a continuous variable, higher HFpEF-ABA scores were independently associated with an increased risk of the primary composite outcome (P = 0.001), with a modest non-linear relationship observed (P for non-linearity = 0.040). In the intensive treatment group, the absolute reduction in primary outcomes was 5.0 per 1000 patient-years for scores < 90% and 11.2 per 1000 patient-years for ≥ 90%. Intensive blood pressure control reduced primary outcomes in both groups [<90%: aHR, 0.75 (0.62-0.90); ≥90%: aHR, 0.76 (0.51-1.13)] with no significant heterogeneity (P for interaction = 0.944). Serious adverse events did not increase in either group [<90%: aHR, 1.04 (0.96-1.11); ≥90%: aHR, 1.06 (0.88-1.28); P for interaction = 0.801].</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The HFpEF-ABA score identifies high-risk patients with undiagnosed HFpEF who have elevated cardiovascular event rates and benefit from intensive blood pressure control without an increased risk of serious adverse events.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11864,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ESC Heart Failure\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ESC Heart Failure\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/ehf2.15435\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ESC Heart Failure","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/ehf2.15435","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:保留射血分数的心力衰竭(HFpEF)经常被误诊。本研究评估了HFpEF- aba评分识别心血管事件发生率升高的高危、未确诊的HFpEF亚组的能力,并评估了强化血压控制对这些人群的影响。方法:对收缩压干预试验(SPRINT)进行事后分析。HFpEF- aba评分可识别未确诊的HFpEF高危个体。采用Cox比例风险回归检验HFpEF-ABA评分组与强化血压控制对主要心血管结局的相互作用。主要结局是心肌梗死(MI)、未导致MI的急性冠状动脉综合征、中风、急性失代偿性心力衰竭和心血管疾病死亡的综合结果。结果:9265例患者(平均年龄67.9±9.4岁,女性占35.5%),559例主要结局发生在中位随访3.2年期间。HFpEF-ABA评分≥90%与主要结局的高风险相关[校正风险比(aHR), 1.96 (1.57-2.44);结论:HFpEF- aba评分可识别未确诊的高危HFpEF患者,这些患者心血管事件发生率升高,并受益于强化血压控制,但未增加严重不良事件的风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Assessing cardiovascular benefits of intensive blood pressure lowering in high-risk undiagnosed HFpEF patients.

Aims: Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) is often underdiagnosed. This study evaluates the HFpEF-ABA score's ability to identify high-risk, undiagnosed HFpEF subgroups with elevated cardiovascular event rates and assesses the impact of intensive blood pressure control in these populations.

Methods: A post-hoc analysis of the Systolic Blood Pressure Intervention Trial (SPRINT) was performed. The HFpEF-ABA score identified high-risk individuals with undiagnosed HFpEF. Cox proportional hazards regression was used to examine interactions between HFpEF-ABA score groups and intensive blood pressure control on major cardiovascular outcomes. The primary outcome was a composite of myocardial infarction (MI), acute coronary syndrome not resulting in MI, stroke, acute decompensated heart failure and cardiovascular disease death.

Results: Among 9265 patients (mean age, 67.9 ± 9.4 years; 35.5% females), 559 primary outcomes occurred during a median follow-up of 3.2 years. An HFpEF-ABA score ≥ 90% was associated with a higher risk of the primary outcome [adjusted hazard ratio (aHR), 1.96 (1.57-2.44); P < 0.001]. When treated as a continuous variable, higher HFpEF-ABA scores were independently associated with an increased risk of the primary composite outcome (P = 0.001), with a modest non-linear relationship observed (P for non-linearity = 0.040). In the intensive treatment group, the absolute reduction in primary outcomes was 5.0 per 1000 patient-years for scores < 90% and 11.2 per 1000 patient-years for ≥ 90%. Intensive blood pressure control reduced primary outcomes in both groups [<90%: aHR, 0.75 (0.62-0.90); ≥90%: aHR, 0.76 (0.51-1.13)] with no significant heterogeneity (P for interaction = 0.944). Serious adverse events did not increase in either group [<90%: aHR, 1.04 (0.96-1.11); ≥90%: aHR, 1.06 (0.88-1.28); P for interaction = 0.801].

Conclusions: The HFpEF-ABA score identifies high-risk patients with undiagnosed HFpEF who have elevated cardiovascular event rates and benefit from intensive blood pressure control without an increased risk of serious adverse events.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
ESC Heart Failure
ESC Heart Failure Medicine-Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
CiteScore
7.00
自引率
7.90%
发文量
461
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊介绍: ESC Heart Failure is the open access journal of the Heart Failure Association of the European Society of Cardiology dedicated to the advancement of knowledge in the field of heart failure. The journal aims to improve the understanding, prevention, investigation and treatment of heart failure. Molecular and cellular biology, pathology, physiology, electrophysiology, pharmacology, as well as the clinical, social and population sciences all form part of the discipline that is heart failure. Accordingly, submission of manuscripts on basic, translational, clinical and population sciences is invited. Original contributions on nursing, care of the elderly, primary care, health economics and other specialist fields related to heart failure are also welcome, as are case reports that highlight interesting aspects of heart failure care and treatment.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信