移植后使用环磷酰胺的匹配非亲属与单倍体相同供体造血细胞移植。

IF 7.1 1区 医学 Q1 HEMATOLOGY
Dipenkumar Modi, Yosra M Aljawai, Todd E DeFor, Caitrin Bupp, Monzr M Al Malki, Javier Bolaños-Meade, Mahasweta Gooptu, Antonio M Jimenez Jimenez, Hongtao Liu, Felix Mensah, Marco Mielcarek, Brian C Shaffer, Bronwen E Shaw, Stephen R Spellman, Heather E Stefanski, Jeffery J Auletta, Steven M Devine, Farhad Khimani, Ramzi Abboud
{"title":"移植后使用环磷酰胺的匹配非亲属与单倍体相同供体造血细胞移植。","authors":"Dipenkumar Modi, Yosra M Aljawai, Todd E DeFor, Caitrin Bupp, Monzr M Al Malki, Javier Bolaños-Meade, Mahasweta Gooptu, Antonio M Jimenez Jimenez, Hongtao Liu, Felix Mensah, Marco Mielcarek, Brian C Shaffer, Bronwen E Shaw, Stephen R Spellman, Heather E Stefanski, Jeffery J Auletta, Steven M Devine, Farhad Khimani, Ramzi Abboud","doi":"10.1182/bloodadvances.2025017194","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Post-transplant cyclophosphamide (PTCy)-based graft-vs-host disease (GVHD) prophylaxis is the new standard for matched unrelated donor (MUD) hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT). Prior studies comparing MUD and haploidentical donor HCT using PTCy were limited by size and short follow-up. We therefore performed a registry-based analysis examining the impact of donor type on HCT with PTCy. Adult patients (n=5,873) who received MUD (n=1,973) or haploidentical (n=3900) HCT with PTCy for acute leukemia (74.2%) or myelodysplastic syndrome (25.8%) reported to the CIBMTR between 2017- 2021 were included. Primary endpoints were three-year overall survival (OS) and GVHD-free, relapse-free survival (GRFS). Cox regression and sensitivity analyses were performed through adjustment of propensity scores. Haploidentical HCT had worse OS (Hazard ratio [HR] 1.15, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.04-1.27, p=0.005) and GRFS (HR 1.19, 95% CI 1.10-1.29, p<0.001) compared to MUD HCT. Donor age was the only other consistent donor-related factor associated with survival. Results were confirmed in a sensitivity analysis adjusted for propensity scores. When the cohort was restricted to reduced intensity conditioning only or donors <30 years-old, OS did not differ between groups. Haploidentical HCT was associated with higher primary graft failure (HR 1.67; p=0.002), increased grade III-IV acute GVHD (HR 1.28; p=0.039), higher moderate/severe chronic GVHD (HR 1.47; p<0.001) and non-relapse mortality (HR 1.34; p<0.001). Grade II-IV aGVHD and relapse risk did not differ between the donor types. This large analysis showed that in adults with acute leukemia or MDS, MUD HCT was associated with improved outcomes compared to haplo HCT with PTCy-based GVHD prophylaxis.</p>","PeriodicalId":9228,"journal":{"name":"Blood advances","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":7.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Matched Unrelated vs Haploidentical Donor Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation Using Post-Transplant Cyclophosphamide.\",\"authors\":\"Dipenkumar Modi, Yosra M Aljawai, Todd E DeFor, Caitrin Bupp, Monzr M Al Malki, Javier Bolaños-Meade, Mahasweta Gooptu, Antonio M Jimenez Jimenez, Hongtao Liu, Felix Mensah, Marco Mielcarek, Brian C Shaffer, Bronwen E Shaw, Stephen R Spellman, Heather E Stefanski, Jeffery J Auletta, Steven M Devine, Farhad Khimani, Ramzi Abboud\",\"doi\":\"10.1182/bloodadvances.2025017194\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Post-transplant cyclophosphamide (PTCy)-based graft-vs-host disease (GVHD) prophylaxis is the new standard for matched unrelated donor (MUD) hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT). Prior studies comparing MUD and haploidentical donor HCT using PTCy were limited by size and short follow-up. We therefore performed a registry-based analysis examining the impact of donor type on HCT with PTCy. Adult patients (n=5,873) who received MUD (n=1,973) or haploidentical (n=3900) HCT with PTCy for acute leukemia (74.2%) or myelodysplastic syndrome (25.8%) reported to the CIBMTR between 2017- 2021 were included. Primary endpoints were three-year overall survival (OS) and GVHD-free, relapse-free survival (GRFS). Cox regression and sensitivity analyses were performed through adjustment of propensity scores. Haploidentical HCT had worse OS (Hazard ratio [HR] 1.15, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.04-1.27, p=0.005) and GRFS (HR 1.19, 95% CI 1.10-1.29, p<0.001) compared to MUD HCT. Donor age was the only other consistent donor-related factor associated with survival. Results were confirmed in a sensitivity analysis adjusted for propensity scores. When the cohort was restricted to reduced intensity conditioning only or donors <30 years-old, OS did not differ between groups. Haploidentical HCT was associated with higher primary graft failure (HR 1.67; p=0.002), increased grade III-IV acute GVHD (HR 1.28; p=0.039), higher moderate/severe chronic GVHD (HR 1.47; p<0.001) and non-relapse mortality (HR 1.34; p<0.001). Grade II-IV aGVHD and relapse risk did not differ between the donor types. This large analysis showed that in adults with acute leukemia or MDS, MUD HCT was associated with improved outcomes compared to haplo HCT with PTCy-based GVHD prophylaxis.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9228,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Blood advances\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":7.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Blood advances\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1182/bloodadvances.2025017194\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"HEMATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Blood advances","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1182/bloodadvances.2025017194","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

移植后基于环磷酰胺(PTCy)的移植物抗宿主病(GVHD)预防是匹配非亲属供体(MUD)造血细胞移植(HCT)的新标准。先前比较MUD和使用PTCy的单倍同供体HCT的研究受到规模和随访时间短的限制。因此,我们进行了一项基于登记的分析,研究了供体类型对PTCy HCT的影响。在2017- 2021年期间向CIBMTR报告的急性白血病(74.2%)或骨髓增生异常综合征(25.8%)接受MUD (n= 1973)或单倍体(n=3900) HCT合并PTCy的成年患者(n= 5873)。主要终点是三年总生存期(OS)和无gvhd、无复发生存期(GRFS)。通过调整倾向得分进行Cox回归和敏感性分析。单倍相同HCT的OS(风险比[HR] 1.15, 95%可信区间[CI] 1.04 ~ 1.27, p=0.005)和GRFS(风险比[HR] 1.19, 95% CI 1.10 ~ 1.29, p=0.005)较差
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Matched Unrelated vs Haploidentical Donor Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation Using Post-Transplant Cyclophosphamide.

Post-transplant cyclophosphamide (PTCy)-based graft-vs-host disease (GVHD) prophylaxis is the new standard for matched unrelated donor (MUD) hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT). Prior studies comparing MUD and haploidentical donor HCT using PTCy were limited by size and short follow-up. We therefore performed a registry-based analysis examining the impact of donor type on HCT with PTCy. Adult patients (n=5,873) who received MUD (n=1,973) or haploidentical (n=3900) HCT with PTCy for acute leukemia (74.2%) or myelodysplastic syndrome (25.8%) reported to the CIBMTR between 2017- 2021 were included. Primary endpoints were three-year overall survival (OS) and GVHD-free, relapse-free survival (GRFS). Cox regression and sensitivity analyses were performed through adjustment of propensity scores. Haploidentical HCT had worse OS (Hazard ratio [HR] 1.15, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.04-1.27, p=0.005) and GRFS (HR 1.19, 95% CI 1.10-1.29, p<0.001) compared to MUD HCT. Donor age was the only other consistent donor-related factor associated with survival. Results were confirmed in a sensitivity analysis adjusted for propensity scores. When the cohort was restricted to reduced intensity conditioning only or donors <30 years-old, OS did not differ between groups. Haploidentical HCT was associated with higher primary graft failure (HR 1.67; p=0.002), increased grade III-IV acute GVHD (HR 1.28; p=0.039), higher moderate/severe chronic GVHD (HR 1.47; p<0.001) and non-relapse mortality (HR 1.34; p<0.001). Grade II-IV aGVHD and relapse risk did not differ between the donor types. This large analysis showed that in adults with acute leukemia or MDS, MUD HCT was associated with improved outcomes compared to haplo HCT with PTCy-based GVHD prophylaxis.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Blood advances
Blood advances Medicine-Hematology
CiteScore
12.70
自引率
2.70%
发文量
840
期刊介绍: Blood Advances, a semimonthly medical journal published by the American Society of Hematology, marks the first addition to the Blood family in 70 years. This peer-reviewed, online-only, open-access journal was launched under the leadership of founding editor-in-chief Robert Negrin, MD, from Stanford University Medical Center in Stanford, CA, with its inaugural issue released on November 29, 2016. Blood Advances serves as an international platform for original articles detailing basic laboratory, translational, and clinical investigations in hematology. The journal comprehensively covers all aspects of hematology, including disorders of leukocytes (both benign and malignant), erythrocytes, platelets, hemostatic mechanisms, vascular biology, immunology, and hematologic oncology. Each article undergoes a rigorous peer-review process, with selection based on the originality of the findings, the high quality of the work presented, and the clarity of the presentation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信