优化慢病毒载体生产:洞察PiggyBac转座酶和串联阵列策略。

IF 3.1 3区 生物学 Q2 BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS
Jona Röscheise, Maximilian Klimpel, Janina Hoffman, Vathsalya Pabbathi, Herbert Dersch, Parameswari Govindarajan, Holger Laux, Kerstin Otte
{"title":"优化慢病毒载体生产:洞察PiggyBac转座酶和串联阵列策略。","authors":"Jona Röscheise, Maximilian Klimpel, Janina Hoffman, Vathsalya Pabbathi, Herbert Dersch, Parameswari Govindarajan, Holger Laux, Kerstin Otte","doi":"10.1002/biot.70135","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Lentiviral vectors (LVVs) are essential tools in gene and cell therapy due to their ability to transduce both dividing and non-dividing cells. Conventional production by transient plasmid co-transfection is variable, costly, and difficult to scale, prompting development of stable producer cell lines. Historically, the GPRTG cell line has been generated using concatemeric-array integration, which requires high DNA input, complex workflows, and can cause genetic instability. To address these limitations, we evaluated a transposase-mediated integration strategy. Compared with the concatemeric-array method, transposase-based integration enabled faster recovery after selection with only a mild viability crisis and required substantially less DNA. This approach generated highly diverse and heterogeneous producer pools, providing a strong basis for subsequent clonal selection. During LVV production, both methods maintained comparable cell growth stability. However, concatemeric-derived pools exhibited greater variability in recovery kinetics, viable cell density, and LVV titers, despite achieving the highest maximum titers overall. In contrast, transposase-mediated pools showed more consistent performance, supporting their reliability for large-scale applications. In summary, transposase-based integration offers a robust and scalable alternative to concatemeric-array methods for generating stable LVV producer cell lines, with significant potential to streamline LVV manufacturing for gene therapy.</p>","PeriodicalId":134,"journal":{"name":"Biotechnology Journal","volume":"20 10","pages":"e70135"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12501403/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Optimizing Lentiviral Vector Production: Insights Into PiggyBac Transposase and Concatemeric Array Strategies.\",\"authors\":\"Jona Röscheise, Maximilian Klimpel, Janina Hoffman, Vathsalya Pabbathi, Herbert Dersch, Parameswari Govindarajan, Holger Laux, Kerstin Otte\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/biot.70135\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Lentiviral vectors (LVVs) are essential tools in gene and cell therapy due to their ability to transduce both dividing and non-dividing cells. Conventional production by transient plasmid co-transfection is variable, costly, and difficult to scale, prompting development of stable producer cell lines. Historically, the GPRTG cell line has been generated using concatemeric-array integration, which requires high DNA input, complex workflows, and can cause genetic instability. To address these limitations, we evaluated a transposase-mediated integration strategy. Compared with the concatemeric-array method, transposase-based integration enabled faster recovery after selection with only a mild viability crisis and required substantially less DNA. This approach generated highly diverse and heterogeneous producer pools, providing a strong basis for subsequent clonal selection. During LVV production, both methods maintained comparable cell growth stability. However, concatemeric-derived pools exhibited greater variability in recovery kinetics, viable cell density, and LVV titers, despite achieving the highest maximum titers overall. In contrast, transposase-mediated pools showed more consistent performance, supporting their reliability for large-scale applications. In summary, transposase-based integration offers a robust and scalable alternative to concatemeric-array methods for generating stable LVV producer cell lines, with significant potential to streamline LVV manufacturing for gene therapy.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":134,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Biotechnology Journal\",\"volume\":\"20 10\",\"pages\":\"e70135\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12501403/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Biotechnology Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/biot.70135\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"生物学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biotechnology Journal","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/biot.70135","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

慢病毒载体(LVVs)是基因和细胞治疗中必不可少的工具,因为它们具有转导分裂和非分裂细胞的能力。通过瞬时质粒共转染的传统生产是可变的,昂贵的,并且难以规模化,促进了稳定生产细胞系的发展。从历史上看,GPRTG细胞系是使用串联阵列集成产生的,这需要高DNA输入,复杂的工作流程,并且可能导致遗传不稳定。为了解决这些限制,我们评估了转座酶介导的整合策略。与串联阵列方法相比,基于转座酶的整合能够在选择后更快地恢复,只有轻微的生存危机,所需的DNA也少得多。这种方法产生了高度多样化和异质性的生产者池,为随后的克隆选择提供了强有力的基础。在LVV生产过程中,两种方法都保持了相当的细胞生长稳定性。然而,尽管总体上达到了最高滴度,但串联衍生池在恢复动力学、活细胞密度和LVV滴度方面表现出更大的可变性。相比之下,转座酶介导的池表现出更一致的性能,支持它们在大规模应用程序中的可靠性。总之,基于转座酶的整合为产生稳定的LVV产生细胞系提供了一种强大且可扩展的替代方法,具有简化LVV制造用于基因治疗的巨大潜力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Optimizing Lentiviral Vector Production: Insights Into PiggyBac Transposase and Concatemeric Array Strategies.

Lentiviral vectors (LVVs) are essential tools in gene and cell therapy due to their ability to transduce both dividing and non-dividing cells. Conventional production by transient plasmid co-transfection is variable, costly, and difficult to scale, prompting development of stable producer cell lines. Historically, the GPRTG cell line has been generated using concatemeric-array integration, which requires high DNA input, complex workflows, and can cause genetic instability. To address these limitations, we evaluated a transposase-mediated integration strategy. Compared with the concatemeric-array method, transposase-based integration enabled faster recovery after selection with only a mild viability crisis and required substantially less DNA. This approach generated highly diverse and heterogeneous producer pools, providing a strong basis for subsequent clonal selection. During LVV production, both methods maintained comparable cell growth stability. However, concatemeric-derived pools exhibited greater variability in recovery kinetics, viable cell density, and LVV titers, despite achieving the highest maximum titers overall. In contrast, transposase-mediated pools showed more consistent performance, supporting their reliability for large-scale applications. In summary, transposase-based integration offers a robust and scalable alternative to concatemeric-array methods for generating stable LVV producer cell lines, with significant potential to streamline LVV manufacturing for gene therapy.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Biotechnology Journal
Biotechnology Journal Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology-Molecular Medicine
CiteScore
8.90
自引率
2.10%
发文量
123
审稿时长
1.5 months
期刊介绍: Biotechnology Journal (2019 Journal Citation Reports: 3.543) is fully comprehensive in its scope and publishes strictly peer-reviewed papers covering novel aspects and methods in all areas of biotechnology. Some issues are devoted to a special topic, providing the latest information on the most crucial areas of research and technological advances. In addition to these special issues, the journal welcomes unsolicited submissions for primary research articles, such as Research Articles, Rapid Communications and Biotech Methods. BTJ also welcomes proposals of Review Articles - please send in a brief outline of the article and the senior author''s CV to the editorial office. BTJ promotes a special emphasis on: Systems Biotechnology Synthetic Biology and Metabolic Engineering Nanobiotechnology and Biomaterials Tissue engineering, Regenerative Medicine and Stem cells Gene Editing, Gene therapy and Immunotherapy Omics technologies Industrial Biotechnology, Biopharmaceuticals and Biocatalysis Bioprocess engineering and Downstream processing Plant Biotechnology Biosafety, Biotech Ethics, Science Communication Methods and Advances.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信