将权利置于以人为本的艾滋病毒预防工作的中心

IF 4.9 1区 医学 Q2 IMMUNOLOGY
Megan McLemore, Joseph J. Amon
{"title":"将权利置于以人为本的艾滋病毒预防工作的中心","authors":"Megan McLemore,&nbsp;Joseph J. Amon","doi":"10.1002/jia2.70028","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Introduction</h3>\n \n <p>“Person-centred” and “people-centred” HIV prevention programmes both seek to scale up access to HIV prevention services. A “person-centred” approach presents a vision of a client with agency in decision-making, engaged and empowered, working with providers in a process that is not disease-centric but focused on addressing, holistically, a client's needs. A “people-centred” approach recognizes the broader role of family and community, as well as the influence of the political and legal environment as barriers or facilitators to HIV services. In both cases, human rights are a critical determinant of positive or negative outcomes.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Discussion</h3>\n \n <p>In 2017, the Global Fund's <i>Breaking Down Barriers</i> initiative funded baseline assessments in 20 countries examining key human rights barriers to HIV services. Subsequent evaluations in 2019–2021 and 2022–2024 focused on the scale-up of community-led human rights interventions and the impact of these programmes on access to HIV prevention and care. Results from the latest assessment describe a range of strategies and impact across diverse countries, settings and populations. For example, in Indonesia, transgender-led organizations catalysed a national drive to allow transgender persons to receive gender-matched identity cards, allowing thousands of individuals to access HIV prevention and treatment and broader social benefits. In Mozambique, peer-led paralegals and community advocates promoted legal literacy and assisted clients with claims of human rights violations, preventing access to HIV services. In Jamaica, lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender led organizations sponsored trainings that advanced community activism for HIV prevention, education and advocacy. Despite facing stigma and challenging legal environments, in each case, human rights-based programmes removed structural and legal barriers to HIV prevention services, strengthening accountability and increasing uptake and retention in HIV services, especially among marginalized and criminalized populations.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>Community mobilization led by key populations is a long-term undertaking that requires partnership and support from a wide range of stakeholders to ensure sustainability. A growing body of evidence across a range of diverse countries and settings demonstrates the impact of rights-based and people-centred programmes on access to, and retention in, HIV prevention and treatment.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":201,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the International AIDS Society","volume":"28 S5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/jia2.70028","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Put rights at the centre of person- and people-centred HIV prevention\",\"authors\":\"Megan McLemore,&nbsp;Joseph J. Amon\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/jia2.70028\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Introduction</h3>\\n \\n <p>“Person-centred” and “people-centred” HIV prevention programmes both seek to scale up access to HIV prevention services. A “person-centred” approach presents a vision of a client with agency in decision-making, engaged and empowered, working with providers in a process that is not disease-centric but focused on addressing, holistically, a client's needs. A “people-centred” approach recognizes the broader role of family and community, as well as the influence of the political and legal environment as barriers or facilitators to HIV services. In both cases, human rights are a critical determinant of positive or negative outcomes.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Discussion</h3>\\n \\n <p>In 2017, the Global Fund's <i>Breaking Down Barriers</i> initiative funded baseline assessments in 20 countries examining key human rights barriers to HIV services. Subsequent evaluations in 2019–2021 and 2022–2024 focused on the scale-up of community-led human rights interventions and the impact of these programmes on access to HIV prevention and care. Results from the latest assessment describe a range of strategies and impact across diverse countries, settings and populations. For example, in Indonesia, transgender-led organizations catalysed a national drive to allow transgender persons to receive gender-matched identity cards, allowing thousands of individuals to access HIV prevention and treatment and broader social benefits. In Mozambique, peer-led paralegals and community advocates promoted legal literacy and assisted clients with claims of human rights violations, preventing access to HIV services. In Jamaica, lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender led organizations sponsored trainings that advanced community activism for HIV prevention, education and advocacy. Despite facing stigma and challenging legal environments, in each case, human rights-based programmes removed structural and legal barriers to HIV prevention services, strengthening accountability and increasing uptake and retention in HIV services, especially among marginalized and criminalized populations.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\\n \\n <p>Community mobilization led by key populations is a long-term undertaking that requires partnership and support from a wide range of stakeholders to ensure sustainability. A growing body of evidence across a range of diverse countries and settings demonstrates the impact of rights-based and people-centred programmes on access to, and retention in, HIV prevention and treatment.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":201,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of the International AIDS Society\",\"volume\":\"28 S5\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/jia2.70028\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of the International AIDS Society\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jia2.70028\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"IMMUNOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the International AIDS Society","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jia2.70028","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"IMMUNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

“以人为本”和“以人为本”的艾滋病毒预防规划都力求扩大获得艾滋病毒预防服务的机会。“以人为本”的做法提出了这样一种愿景,即客户有机构参与决策,参与并获得授权,在一个不以疾病为中心,而是注重全面解决客户需求的过程中与提供者合作。“以人为本”的做法承认家庭和社区的更广泛作用,以及政治和法律环境作为艾滋病毒服务障碍或促进者的影响。在这两种情况下,人权都是决定积极或消极结果的关键因素。2017年,全球基金的“打破障碍”倡议资助了20个国家的基线评估,审查艾滋病毒服务的主要人权障碍。随后在2019-2021年和2022-2024年进行的评估侧重于扩大社区主导的人权干预措施,以及这些规划对获得艾滋病毒预防和护理的影响。最新评估的结果描述了一系列战略及其对不同国家、环境和人群的影响。例如,在印度尼西亚,跨性别组织推动了一场全国运动,允许跨性别者获得性别匹配的身份证,使成千上万的人能够获得艾滋病毒预防和治疗以及更广泛的社会福利。在莫桑比克,由同行领导的律师助理和社区倡导者促进了法律知识普及,并协助客户提出侵犯人权的申诉,防止他们获得艾滋病毒服务。在牙买加,由女同性恋、男同性恋、双性恋和变性人领导的组织赞助培训,推动社区艾滋病预防、教育和宣传活动。尽管面临耻辱和具有挑战性的法律环境,但在每一种情况下,基于人权的方案消除了艾滋病毒预防服务的结构性和法律障碍,加强了问责制,增加了艾滋病毒服务的接受和保留,特别是在边缘化和犯罪人群中。关键人群领导的社区动员是一项长期工作,需要广泛利益攸关方的合作和支持,以确保可持续性。来自不同国家和环境的越来越多的证据表明,以权利为基础和以人为本的规划对艾滋病毒预防和治疗的可及性和坚持性产生了影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Put rights at the centre of person- and people-centred HIV prevention

Put rights at the centre of person- and people-centred HIV prevention

Introduction

“Person-centred” and “people-centred” HIV prevention programmes both seek to scale up access to HIV prevention services. A “person-centred” approach presents a vision of a client with agency in decision-making, engaged and empowered, working with providers in a process that is not disease-centric but focused on addressing, holistically, a client's needs. A “people-centred” approach recognizes the broader role of family and community, as well as the influence of the political and legal environment as barriers or facilitators to HIV services. In both cases, human rights are a critical determinant of positive or negative outcomes.

Discussion

In 2017, the Global Fund's Breaking Down Barriers initiative funded baseline assessments in 20 countries examining key human rights barriers to HIV services. Subsequent evaluations in 2019–2021 and 2022–2024 focused on the scale-up of community-led human rights interventions and the impact of these programmes on access to HIV prevention and care. Results from the latest assessment describe a range of strategies and impact across diverse countries, settings and populations. For example, in Indonesia, transgender-led organizations catalysed a national drive to allow transgender persons to receive gender-matched identity cards, allowing thousands of individuals to access HIV prevention and treatment and broader social benefits. In Mozambique, peer-led paralegals and community advocates promoted legal literacy and assisted clients with claims of human rights violations, preventing access to HIV services. In Jamaica, lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender led organizations sponsored trainings that advanced community activism for HIV prevention, education and advocacy. Despite facing stigma and challenging legal environments, in each case, human rights-based programmes removed structural and legal barriers to HIV prevention services, strengthening accountability and increasing uptake and retention in HIV services, especially among marginalized and criminalized populations.

Conclusions

Community mobilization led by key populations is a long-term undertaking that requires partnership and support from a wide range of stakeholders to ensure sustainability. A growing body of evidence across a range of diverse countries and settings demonstrates the impact of rights-based and people-centred programmes on access to, and retention in, HIV prevention and treatment.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of the International AIDS Society
Journal of the International AIDS Society IMMUNOLOGY-INFECTIOUS DISEASES
CiteScore
8.60
自引率
10.00%
发文量
186
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of the International AIDS Society (JIAS) is a peer-reviewed and Open Access journal for the generation and dissemination of evidence from a wide range of disciplines: basic and biomedical sciences; behavioural sciences; epidemiology; clinical sciences; health economics and health policy; operations research and implementation sciences; and social sciences and humanities. Submission of HIV research carried out in low- and middle-income countries is strongly encouraged.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信