{"title":"政策导向的环境信息披露是否增加了市场的不确定性?来自中国股价波动的证据","authors":"Cheng Liu , Siyuan Dong , Xinyi Gao","doi":"10.1016/j.ribaf.2025.103152","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Using textual analysis on Chinese listed firms from 2015 to 2022, this study investigates how policy-oriented environmental disclosures affect stock price volatility. Drawing on institutional and stakeholder theories, we find that such disclosure increases market uncertainty by signaling symbolic regulatory compliance rather than value-relevant performance, thereby weakening investor confidence. This effect is amplified under stronger regulative and normative pressures, while cognitive pressure shows no significant impact. Further analysis indicates that policy-oriented environmental disclosures help companies enhance regulatory legitimacy and obtain environmental subsidies, thereby mitigating and offsetting the negative impact of stock price volatility. Additionally, companies can strategically manage conflicting demands among stakeholders by adjusting the form and content of environmental disclosures. Heterogeneity tests show that policy-oriented environmental disclosures lead to more significant stock price volatility in high-tech companies, non-state-owned enterprises, pollution-intensive industries, and companies with a history of environmental violations. Our findings highlight the complex trade-offs firms navigate in environmental reporting and the dual influence of competing institutional pressures in shaping both the form quality and content quality of firm environmental disclosure.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":51430,"journal":{"name":"Research in International Business and Finance","volume":"81 ","pages":"Article 103152"},"PeriodicalIF":6.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Does policy-oriented environmental disclosure increase market uncertainty? Evidence from stock price volatility in China\",\"authors\":\"Cheng Liu , Siyuan Dong , Xinyi Gao\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ribaf.2025.103152\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Using textual analysis on Chinese listed firms from 2015 to 2022, this study investigates how policy-oriented environmental disclosures affect stock price volatility. Drawing on institutional and stakeholder theories, we find that such disclosure increases market uncertainty by signaling symbolic regulatory compliance rather than value-relevant performance, thereby weakening investor confidence. This effect is amplified under stronger regulative and normative pressures, while cognitive pressure shows no significant impact. Further analysis indicates that policy-oriented environmental disclosures help companies enhance regulatory legitimacy and obtain environmental subsidies, thereby mitigating and offsetting the negative impact of stock price volatility. Additionally, companies can strategically manage conflicting demands among stakeholders by adjusting the form and content of environmental disclosures. Heterogeneity tests show that policy-oriented environmental disclosures lead to more significant stock price volatility in high-tech companies, non-state-owned enterprises, pollution-intensive industries, and companies with a history of environmental violations. Our findings highlight the complex trade-offs firms navigate in environmental reporting and the dual influence of competing institutional pressures in shaping both the form quality and content quality of firm environmental disclosure.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51430,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Research in International Business and Finance\",\"volume\":\"81 \",\"pages\":\"Article 103152\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Research in International Business and Finance\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0275531925004088\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"BUSINESS, FINANCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Research in International Business and Finance","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0275531925004088","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS, FINANCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
Does policy-oriented environmental disclosure increase market uncertainty? Evidence from stock price volatility in China
Using textual analysis on Chinese listed firms from 2015 to 2022, this study investigates how policy-oriented environmental disclosures affect stock price volatility. Drawing on institutional and stakeholder theories, we find that such disclosure increases market uncertainty by signaling symbolic regulatory compliance rather than value-relevant performance, thereby weakening investor confidence. This effect is amplified under stronger regulative and normative pressures, while cognitive pressure shows no significant impact. Further analysis indicates that policy-oriented environmental disclosures help companies enhance regulatory legitimacy and obtain environmental subsidies, thereby mitigating and offsetting the negative impact of stock price volatility. Additionally, companies can strategically manage conflicting demands among stakeholders by adjusting the form and content of environmental disclosures. Heterogeneity tests show that policy-oriented environmental disclosures lead to more significant stock price volatility in high-tech companies, non-state-owned enterprises, pollution-intensive industries, and companies with a history of environmental violations. Our findings highlight the complex trade-offs firms navigate in environmental reporting and the dual influence of competing institutional pressures in shaping both the form quality and content quality of firm environmental disclosure.
期刊介绍:
Research in International Business and Finance (RIBAF) seeks to consolidate its position as a premier scholarly vehicle of academic finance. The Journal publishes high quality, insightful, well-written papers that explore current and new issues in international finance. Papers that foster dialogue, innovation, and intellectual risk-taking in financial studies; as well as shed light on the interaction between finance and broader societal concerns are particularly appreciated. The Journal welcomes submissions that seek to expand the boundaries of academic finance and otherwise challenge the discipline. Papers studying finance using a variety of methodologies; as well as interdisciplinary studies will be considered for publication. Papers that examine topical issues using extensive international data sets are welcome. Single-country studies can also be considered for publication provided that they develop novel methodological and theoretical approaches or fall within the Journal''s priority themes. It is especially important that single-country studies communicate to the reader why the particular chosen country is especially relevant to the issue being investigated. [...] The scope of topics that are most interesting to RIBAF readers include the following: -Financial markets and institutions -Financial practices and sustainability -The impact of national culture on finance -The impact of formal and informal institutions on finance -Privatizations, public financing, and nonprofit issues in finance -Interdisciplinary financial studies -Finance and international development -International financial crises and regulation -Financialization studies -International financial integration and architecture -Behavioral aspects in finance -Consumer finance -Methodologies and conceptualization issues related to finance