SARS-CoV-2感染和疫苗接种后格林-巴罗综合征腺病毒反应性增强

IF 11.7 1区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Brain Pub Date : 2025-10-05 DOI:10.1093/brain/awaf376
Roberto Bellanti, Ana Candalija Iserte, Claire Bergstrom Johnson, John Goodfellow, Marina Johnson, Wanwisa Dejnirattisai, Stephen Keddie, Joseph J Campo, Gavin Screaton, David Goldblatt, Michael P Lunn, Alexander J Davies, Simon Rinaldi
{"title":"SARS-CoV-2感染和疫苗接种后格林-巴罗综合征腺病毒反应性增强","authors":"Roberto Bellanti, Ana Candalija Iserte, Claire Bergstrom Johnson, John Goodfellow, Marina Johnson, Wanwisa Dejnirattisai, Stephen Keddie, Joseph J Campo, Gavin Screaton, David Goldblatt, Michael P Lunn, Alexander J Davies, Simon Rinaldi","doi":"10.1093/brain/awaf376","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Case reports and series suggested an association between SARS-CoV-2 and Guillain-Barré syndrome (GBS). However, the GBS epidemic which was predicted from early risk estimates did not materialise in overall case numbers, and no plausible mechanism for any link has been established. An increased risk of GBS following adenoviral vector-based COVID-19 vaccination has been more consistently demonstrated, but a pathophysiological explanation for this association has also not yet emerged. Here, we sought to identify whether patients with GBS following COVID-19 infection or vaccination had any distinct clinical or serological features differentiating them from one another or non-pandemic GBS, and to explore the potential mechanisms of any associations. Between March 2020 and October 2021, sera from patients with GBS (n=64) and controls (n=70) were collected. Clinical features were retrieved from medical records. GBS cases were evaluated for diagnostic certainty by Brighton criteria and classified as non-COVID-19 associated (GBS-NC, n=20), GBS after COVID-19 infection (GBS-AC, n=10), or GBS after COVID-19 vaccination (GBS-AV, n=34). The humoral responses to SARS-CoV-2 proteins and putative peripheral nerve antigens, and the cytokine profile of each group were established and compared. Antibodies cloned from the acute-phase plasmablasts of an individual with GBS-AC were also assessed for reactivity against SARS-CoV-2 and peripheral nerve antigens. Sera from GBS patients and from individuals who received COVID-19 vaccinations (n=36: 16 ChAdOx1, 10 Ad26.COV2.S/Janssen, and 10 Tozinameran/Pfizer–BioNTech) without developing GBS were tested for IgG reactivity against SARS-CoV-2 and adenoviral proteins. There were no clinical differences between the GBS groups. Patients with GBS-AC had a greater IgG reactivity to the S1 component of the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein compared to non-GBS COVID-19 controls. A minority of antibodies from cloned plasmablasts targeted SARS-CoV-2 proteins but there was no reactivity or cross reactivity with peripheral nerve antigens or tissue. There were no other serological or immunological differences between the GBS groups. However, when compared to uncomplicated vaccine recipients, GBS patients in toto, and each group individually, demonstrated significantly greater antibody reaction to a range of human adenoviral proteins. Compared to controls exposed to the same immunological stimulus, antibody reactivities to viral antigens are enhanced in patients with GBS. However, we found no mechanistic link between S1 and peripheral nerve reactivity or pathology. Serological responses to adenoviral proteins may be directly involved in the pathogenesis of Guillain-Barré syndrome, potentially contributing to cases with currently unexplained aetiology.","PeriodicalId":9063,"journal":{"name":"Brain","volume":"109 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":11.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Enhanced adenoviral reactivity in Guillain-Barré syndrome after SARS-CoV-2 infection and vaccination\",\"authors\":\"Roberto Bellanti, Ana Candalija Iserte, Claire Bergstrom Johnson, John Goodfellow, Marina Johnson, Wanwisa Dejnirattisai, Stephen Keddie, Joseph J Campo, Gavin Screaton, David Goldblatt, Michael P Lunn, Alexander J Davies, Simon Rinaldi\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/brain/awaf376\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Case reports and series suggested an association between SARS-CoV-2 and Guillain-Barré syndrome (GBS). However, the GBS epidemic which was predicted from early risk estimates did not materialise in overall case numbers, and no plausible mechanism for any link has been established. An increased risk of GBS following adenoviral vector-based COVID-19 vaccination has been more consistently demonstrated, but a pathophysiological explanation for this association has also not yet emerged. Here, we sought to identify whether patients with GBS following COVID-19 infection or vaccination had any distinct clinical or serological features differentiating them from one another or non-pandemic GBS, and to explore the potential mechanisms of any associations. Between March 2020 and October 2021, sera from patients with GBS (n=64) and controls (n=70) were collected. Clinical features were retrieved from medical records. GBS cases were evaluated for diagnostic certainty by Brighton criteria and classified as non-COVID-19 associated (GBS-NC, n=20), GBS after COVID-19 infection (GBS-AC, n=10), or GBS after COVID-19 vaccination (GBS-AV, n=34). The humoral responses to SARS-CoV-2 proteins and putative peripheral nerve antigens, and the cytokine profile of each group were established and compared. Antibodies cloned from the acute-phase plasmablasts of an individual with GBS-AC were also assessed for reactivity against SARS-CoV-2 and peripheral nerve antigens. Sera from GBS patients and from individuals who received COVID-19 vaccinations (n=36: 16 ChAdOx1, 10 Ad26.COV2.S/Janssen, and 10 Tozinameran/Pfizer–BioNTech) without developing GBS were tested for IgG reactivity against SARS-CoV-2 and adenoviral proteins. There were no clinical differences between the GBS groups. Patients with GBS-AC had a greater IgG reactivity to the S1 component of the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein compared to non-GBS COVID-19 controls. A minority of antibodies from cloned plasmablasts targeted SARS-CoV-2 proteins but there was no reactivity or cross reactivity with peripheral nerve antigens or tissue. There were no other serological or immunological differences between the GBS groups. However, when compared to uncomplicated vaccine recipients, GBS patients in toto, and each group individually, demonstrated significantly greater antibody reaction to a range of human adenoviral proteins. Compared to controls exposed to the same immunological stimulus, antibody reactivities to viral antigens are enhanced in patients with GBS. However, we found no mechanistic link between S1 and peripheral nerve reactivity or pathology. Serological responses to adenoviral proteins may be directly involved in the pathogenesis of Guillain-Barré syndrome, potentially contributing to cases with currently unexplained aetiology.\",\"PeriodicalId\":9063,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Brain\",\"volume\":\"109 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":11.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Brain\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/brain/awaf376\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Brain","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/brain/awaf376","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

病例报告和系列研究表明,SARS-CoV-2与格林-巴- 综合征(GBS)之间存在关联。然而,根据早期风险估计预测的吉兰-巴雷综合征流行并没有在总病例数中出现,也没有建立任何联系的合理机制。基于腺病毒载体的COVID-19疫苗接种后GBS风险增加的证据更为一致,但这种关联的病理生理学解释也尚未出现。在这里,我们试图确定COVID-19感染或接种疫苗后的GBS患者是否具有任何独特的临床或血清学特征,以区分他们与其他或非大流行GBS,并探索任何关联的潜在机制。在2020年3月至2021年10月期间,收集了GBS患者(n=64)和对照组(n=70)的血清。临床特征从医疗记录中检索。根据布莱顿标准评估GBS病例的诊断确定性,并将其分为非COVID-19相关(GBS- nc, n=20)、COVID-19感染后的GBS (GBS- ac, n=10)或COVID-19疫苗接种后的GBS (GBS- av, n=34)。建立并比较各组小鼠对SARS-CoV-2蛋白和推测的周围神经抗原的体液反应,以及细胞因子谱。从患有GBS-AC的个体急性期质母细胞中克隆的抗体也被评估对SARS-CoV-2和周围神经抗原的反应性。GBS患者和接种COVID-19疫苗个体的血清(n=36): 16 ChAdOx1, 10 Ad26.COV2。S/Janssen和10个Tozinameran/ Pfizer-BioNTech)未发生GBS,检测IgG对SARS-CoV-2和腺病毒蛋白的反应性。GBS组间无临床差异。与非GBS-AC患者相比,GBS-AC患者对SARS-CoV-2刺突蛋白S1组分的IgG反应性更高。来自克隆的质母细胞的少数抗体针对SARS-CoV-2蛋白,但与周围神经抗原或组织没有反应性或交叉反应性。GBS组之间没有其他血清学或免疫学差异。然而,与不复杂的疫苗接种者相比,GBS患者总体上和每组单独表现出对一系列人腺病毒蛋白的明显更大的抗体反应。与暴露于相同免疫刺激的对照组相比,GBS患者的抗体对病毒抗原的反应性增强。然而,我们没有发现S1与周围神经反应性或病理之间的机制联系。对腺病毒蛋白的血清学反应可能直接参与格林-巴-罗综合征的发病机制,可能导致目前病因不明的病例。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Enhanced adenoviral reactivity in Guillain-Barré syndrome after SARS-CoV-2 infection and vaccination
Case reports and series suggested an association between SARS-CoV-2 and Guillain-Barré syndrome (GBS). However, the GBS epidemic which was predicted from early risk estimates did not materialise in overall case numbers, and no plausible mechanism for any link has been established. An increased risk of GBS following adenoviral vector-based COVID-19 vaccination has been more consistently demonstrated, but a pathophysiological explanation for this association has also not yet emerged. Here, we sought to identify whether patients with GBS following COVID-19 infection or vaccination had any distinct clinical or serological features differentiating them from one another or non-pandemic GBS, and to explore the potential mechanisms of any associations. Between March 2020 and October 2021, sera from patients with GBS (n=64) and controls (n=70) were collected. Clinical features were retrieved from medical records. GBS cases were evaluated for diagnostic certainty by Brighton criteria and classified as non-COVID-19 associated (GBS-NC, n=20), GBS after COVID-19 infection (GBS-AC, n=10), or GBS after COVID-19 vaccination (GBS-AV, n=34). The humoral responses to SARS-CoV-2 proteins and putative peripheral nerve antigens, and the cytokine profile of each group were established and compared. Antibodies cloned from the acute-phase plasmablasts of an individual with GBS-AC were also assessed for reactivity against SARS-CoV-2 and peripheral nerve antigens. Sera from GBS patients and from individuals who received COVID-19 vaccinations (n=36: 16 ChAdOx1, 10 Ad26.COV2.S/Janssen, and 10 Tozinameran/Pfizer–BioNTech) without developing GBS were tested for IgG reactivity against SARS-CoV-2 and adenoviral proteins. There were no clinical differences between the GBS groups. Patients with GBS-AC had a greater IgG reactivity to the S1 component of the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein compared to non-GBS COVID-19 controls. A minority of antibodies from cloned plasmablasts targeted SARS-CoV-2 proteins but there was no reactivity or cross reactivity with peripheral nerve antigens or tissue. There were no other serological or immunological differences between the GBS groups. However, when compared to uncomplicated vaccine recipients, GBS patients in toto, and each group individually, demonstrated significantly greater antibody reaction to a range of human adenoviral proteins. Compared to controls exposed to the same immunological stimulus, antibody reactivities to viral antigens are enhanced in patients with GBS. However, we found no mechanistic link between S1 and peripheral nerve reactivity or pathology. Serological responses to adenoviral proteins may be directly involved in the pathogenesis of Guillain-Barré syndrome, potentially contributing to cases with currently unexplained aetiology.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Brain
Brain 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
20.30
自引率
4.10%
发文量
458
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: Brain, a journal focused on clinical neurology and translational neuroscience, has been publishing landmark papers since 1878. The journal aims to expand its scope by including studies that shed light on disease mechanisms and conducting innovative clinical trials for brain disorders. With a wide range of topics covered, the Editorial Board represents the international readership and diverse coverage of the journal. Accepted articles are promptly posted online, typically within a few weeks of acceptance. As of 2022, Brain holds an impressive impact factor of 14.5, according to the Journal Citation Reports.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信