射线照相和透视的潜在影响——环境生命周期评估。

Elizabeth J Snyder, Cassandra L Thiel, Olesya Struk, Marta Vigil-Garcia, Cecilia Meijer, Josephine Gehrels, Reed A Omary, John R Scheel, Diana Elizabeth Carver
{"title":"射线照相和透视的潜在影响——环境生命周期评估。","authors":"Elizabeth J Snyder, Cassandra L Thiel, Olesya Struk, Marta Vigil-Garcia, Cecilia Meijer, Josephine Gehrels, Reed A Omary, John R Scheel, Diana Elizabeth Carver","doi":"10.1016/j.jacr.2025.09.020","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To assess the environmental impact of radiography and fluoroscopy, using life cycle assessment (LCA), focusing on energy use and emissions.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This ISO 14040-guided LCA-based study focused on radiography and fluoroscopy services, including the production and use of two radiography and two fluoroscopy machines, at a quaternary care 800-bed academic medical center in the Southeastern United States over a 1-year period. Data were collected through direct observation, record review, staff interviews, and energy metering. Environmental impacts were assessed using SimaPro 9.3.0.2 and the Ecoinvent v3.8 database.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Radiography and fluoroscopy activities generated an estimated 55,100 kilograms of CO<sub>2</sub> equivalents (kg CO<sub>2</sub>e) per year. Energy use was the main contributor (47%), with fluoroscopy having much higher per-scan emissions (4.8 and 9.6 kg CO<sub>2</sub>e per scan) than radiography (0.8 kg CO<sub>2</sub>e per scan). Medical linens or textiles accounted for 24% of total emissions. Other significant environmental impacts included ozone depletion, smog, acidification, and eutrophication.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Reducing energy consumption by decarbonizing electricity sources and optimizing equipment use can significantly decrease greenhouse gas emissions. Implementing sustainable practices in linen use, procurement, and end-of-life management is also crucial. Reducing low-value imaging can further mitigate environmental impact.</p>","PeriodicalId":73968,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American College of Radiology : JACR","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Hidden Impact of Radiography and Fluoroscopy-An Environmental Life Cycle Assessment.\",\"authors\":\"Elizabeth J Snyder, Cassandra L Thiel, Olesya Struk, Marta Vigil-Garcia, Cecilia Meijer, Josephine Gehrels, Reed A Omary, John R Scheel, Diana Elizabeth Carver\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jacr.2025.09.020\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To assess the environmental impact of radiography and fluoroscopy, using life cycle assessment (LCA), focusing on energy use and emissions.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This ISO 14040-guided LCA-based study focused on radiography and fluoroscopy services, including the production and use of two radiography and two fluoroscopy machines, at a quaternary care 800-bed academic medical center in the Southeastern United States over a 1-year period. Data were collected through direct observation, record review, staff interviews, and energy metering. Environmental impacts were assessed using SimaPro 9.3.0.2 and the Ecoinvent v3.8 database.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Radiography and fluoroscopy activities generated an estimated 55,100 kilograms of CO<sub>2</sub> equivalents (kg CO<sub>2</sub>e) per year. Energy use was the main contributor (47%), with fluoroscopy having much higher per-scan emissions (4.8 and 9.6 kg CO<sub>2</sub>e per scan) than radiography (0.8 kg CO<sub>2</sub>e per scan). Medical linens or textiles accounted for 24% of total emissions. Other significant environmental impacts included ozone depletion, smog, acidification, and eutrophication.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Reducing energy consumption by decarbonizing electricity sources and optimizing equipment use can significantly decrease greenhouse gas emissions. Implementing sustainable practices in linen use, procurement, and end-of-life management is also crucial. Reducing low-value imaging can further mitigate environmental impact.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":73968,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of the American College of Radiology : JACR\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of the American College of Radiology : JACR\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacr.2025.09.020\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the American College of Radiology : JACR","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacr.2025.09.020","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:利用生命周期评价法(LCA)评价x线摄影和x线透视对环境的影响,重点关注能量消耗和排放。方法:这项以ISO 14040为指导的lca为基础的研究重点是放射照相和透视服务,包括两台放射照相和两台透视机的生产和使用,在美国东南部一家拥有800张床位的学术医疗中心进行了为期一年的研究。通过直接观察、记录审查、员工访谈和能源计量收集数据。环境影响评估使用SimaPro 9.3.0.2和Ecoinvent v3.8数据库。结果:放射照相和透视活动估计每年产生55,100公斤二氧化碳当量(kg CO2e)。能源使用是主要因素(47%),透视检查的每次扫描排放量(每次扫描4.8公斤和9.6公斤二氧化碳当量)远高于放射照相(每次扫描0.8公斤二氧化碳当量)。医用亚麻布或纺织品占总排放量的24%。其他重要的环境影响包括臭氧消耗、烟雾、酸化和富营养化。讨论:通过脱碳电源和优化设备使用来降低能源消耗,可以显著减少温室气体排放。在亚麻的使用、采购和报废管理方面实施可持续的做法也至关重要。减少低价值成像可以进一步减轻对环境的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Hidden Impact of Radiography and Fluoroscopy-An Environmental Life Cycle Assessment.

Objective: To assess the environmental impact of radiography and fluoroscopy, using life cycle assessment (LCA), focusing on energy use and emissions.

Methods: This ISO 14040-guided LCA-based study focused on radiography and fluoroscopy services, including the production and use of two radiography and two fluoroscopy machines, at a quaternary care 800-bed academic medical center in the Southeastern United States over a 1-year period. Data were collected through direct observation, record review, staff interviews, and energy metering. Environmental impacts were assessed using SimaPro 9.3.0.2 and the Ecoinvent v3.8 database.

Results: Radiography and fluoroscopy activities generated an estimated 55,100 kilograms of CO2 equivalents (kg CO2e) per year. Energy use was the main contributor (47%), with fluoroscopy having much higher per-scan emissions (4.8 and 9.6 kg CO2e per scan) than radiography (0.8 kg CO2e per scan). Medical linens or textiles accounted for 24% of total emissions. Other significant environmental impacts included ozone depletion, smog, acidification, and eutrophication.

Discussion: Reducing energy consumption by decarbonizing electricity sources and optimizing equipment use can significantly decrease greenhouse gas emissions. Implementing sustainable practices in linen use, procurement, and end-of-life management is also crucial. Reducing low-value imaging can further mitigate environmental impact.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信