18F-DCFPyL PSMA PET/ ct -超声融合活检在前列腺癌谱系中的诊断价值

IF 2.5 3区 医学 Q3 ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM
Prostate Pub Date : 2025-10-06 DOI:10.1002/pros.70068
Neeraja Tillu, Kacie Schussel, Kaushik P Kolanukuduru, Manish Choudhary, Coskun Kacagan, Ugo Falagario, Yashaswini Agarwal, Asher Mandel, Ashutosh Maheshwari, Hannah Sur, Henry Jodka, Reuben Ben David, Ahmed Eraky, Vinayak Wagaskar, Murilo de Almeida Luz, Ashutosh Tewari
{"title":"18F-DCFPyL PSMA PET/ ct -超声融合活检在前列腺癌谱系中的诊断价值","authors":"Neeraja Tillu, Kacie Schussel, Kaushik P Kolanukuduru, Manish Choudhary, Coskun Kacagan, Ugo Falagario, Yashaswini Agarwal, Asher Mandel, Ashutosh Maheshwari, Hannah Sur, Henry Jodka, Reuben Ben David, Ahmed Eraky, Vinayak Wagaskar, Murilo de Almeida Luz, Ashutosh Tewari","doi":"10.1002/pros.70068","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Multiparametric MRI (mpMRI) is the standard imaging for detecting clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa), but its limitations in MRI-invisible lesions demand complementary strategies. We aimed to evaluate the diagnostic utility of 18F-DCFPyL PSMA PET/CT-ultrasound fusion-guided biopsies in patients by determining the optimal cut-off for the lesion's standardized uptake value (SUV).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a single-center cohort study of 89 men with suspected PCa or low-risk PCa on active surveillance; all underwent PSMA PET/CT before biopsy. Transperineal PSMA PET/US fusion-guided biopsy was performed using the KOELIS Trinity platform. Biopsy outcomes, SUVmax values, and Gleason Grade Group (GGG) were analyzed. Outcomes were compared between MRI-visible and MRI-invisible lesions and among patients with and without prior biopsy. ROC curves and Youden's index were used to assess predictive accuracy and determine optimal SUVmax cut-offs. Decision curve analysis (DCA) was used to evaluate net clinical benefit.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Eighty seven patients had an MRI, of which 34 lesions were MRI invisible. MRI-visible lesions had higher detection rates of PCa (83.3%) compared to MRI-invisible lesions (45.7%, p < 0.001). PET-only identified csPCa in 28% of MRI-invisible lesions (SUVmax mean 9.2 ± 1.8), with 32.4% of these patients proceeding to definitive treatment. Among patients with prior biopsies (60), 35.3% were upgraded, including 18.3% with reassuring/equivocal MRI (PI-RADS ≤ 3) findings. Overall, PET-guided biopsy detected PCa in 47.2% of all patients and csPCa in 24.7%. For the entire cohort, SUVmax ≥ 7.6 provided optimal discrimination between benign and csPCa (AUC = 0.73, 95% CI 0.64-0.82) with a clinical net benefit.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>PSMA PET-fusion targeting can improve accuracy for PCa detection at SUV ≥ 7.7. PET-targeted biopsy can complement standard biopsy methods, especially in those with MRI-invisible lesions or patients with prior negative biopsies.</p>","PeriodicalId":54544,"journal":{"name":"Prostate","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Diagnostic Utility of 18F-DCFPyL PSMA PET/CT-Ultrasound Fusion Biopsies Across the Prostate Cancer Spectrum.\",\"authors\":\"Neeraja Tillu, Kacie Schussel, Kaushik P Kolanukuduru, Manish Choudhary, Coskun Kacagan, Ugo Falagario, Yashaswini Agarwal, Asher Mandel, Ashutosh Maheshwari, Hannah Sur, Henry Jodka, Reuben Ben David, Ahmed Eraky, Vinayak Wagaskar, Murilo de Almeida Luz, Ashutosh Tewari\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/pros.70068\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Multiparametric MRI (mpMRI) is the standard imaging for detecting clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa), but its limitations in MRI-invisible lesions demand complementary strategies. We aimed to evaluate the diagnostic utility of 18F-DCFPyL PSMA PET/CT-ultrasound fusion-guided biopsies in patients by determining the optimal cut-off for the lesion's standardized uptake value (SUV).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a single-center cohort study of 89 men with suspected PCa or low-risk PCa on active surveillance; all underwent PSMA PET/CT before biopsy. Transperineal PSMA PET/US fusion-guided biopsy was performed using the KOELIS Trinity platform. Biopsy outcomes, SUVmax values, and Gleason Grade Group (GGG) were analyzed. Outcomes were compared between MRI-visible and MRI-invisible lesions and among patients with and without prior biopsy. ROC curves and Youden's index were used to assess predictive accuracy and determine optimal SUVmax cut-offs. Decision curve analysis (DCA) was used to evaluate net clinical benefit.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Eighty seven patients had an MRI, of which 34 lesions were MRI invisible. MRI-visible lesions had higher detection rates of PCa (83.3%) compared to MRI-invisible lesions (45.7%, p < 0.001). PET-only identified csPCa in 28% of MRI-invisible lesions (SUVmax mean 9.2 ± 1.8), with 32.4% of these patients proceeding to definitive treatment. Among patients with prior biopsies (60), 35.3% were upgraded, including 18.3% with reassuring/equivocal MRI (PI-RADS ≤ 3) findings. Overall, PET-guided biopsy detected PCa in 47.2% of all patients and csPCa in 24.7%. For the entire cohort, SUVmax ≥ 7.6 provided optimal discrimination between benign and csPCa (AUC = 0.73, 95% CI 0.64-0.82) with a clinical net benefit.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>PSMA PET-fusion targeting can improve accuracy for PCa detection at SUV ≥ 7.7. PET-targeted biopsy can complement standard biopsy methods, especially in those with MRI-invisible lesions or patients with prior negative biopsies.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54544,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Prostate\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Prostate\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/pros.70068\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Prostate","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/pros.70068","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:多参数磁共振成像(mpMRI)是检测临床显著性前列腺癌(csPCa)的标准成像,但其在MRI不可见病变方面的局限性需要补充策略。我们旨在通过确定病变标准化摄取值(SUV)的最佳截止值,评估18F-DCFPyL PSMA PET/ ct超声融合引导活检在患者中的诊断效用。方法:这是一项单中心队列研究,89名男性疑似PCa或低危PCa患者接受主动监测;活检前均行PSMA PET/CT检查。经会阴PSMA PET/US融合引导活检使用KOELIS Trinity平台。分析活检结果、SUVmax值和Gleason分级组(GGG)。比较mri可见病变和mri不可见病变的结果,以及进行和未进行活检的患者的结果。ROC曲线和约登指数用于评估预测准确性和确定最佳SUVmax截止值。采用决策曲线分析(DCA)评价临床净收益。结果:87例患者行MRI检查,其中34例病变MRI不可见。mri可见病变对PCa的检出率(83.3%)高于mri不可见病变(45.7%),p结论:PSMA pet融合靶向可以提高SUV≥7.7时PCa的检出率。pet靶向活检可以补充标准活检方法,特别是那些mri不可见病变或既往活检阴性的患者。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Diagnostic Utility of 18F-DCFPyL PSMA PET/CT-Ultrasound Fusion Biopsies Across the Prostate Cancer Spectrum.

Background: Multiparametric MRI (mpMRI) is the standard imaging for detecting clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa), but its limitations in MRI-invisible lesions demand complementary strategies. We aimed to evaluate the diagnostic utility of 18F-DCFPyL PSMA PET/CT-ultrasound fusion-guided biopsies in patients by determining the optimal cut-off for the lesion's standardized uptake value (SUV).

Methods: This was a single-center cohort study of 89 men with suspected PCa or low-risk PCa on active surveillance; all underwent PSMA PET/CT before biopsy. Transperineal PSMA PET/US fusion-guided biopsy was performed using the KOELIS Trinity platform. Biopsy outcomes, SUVmax values, and Gleason Grade Group (GGG) were analyzed. Outcomes were compared between MRI-visible and MRI-invisible lesions and among patients with and without prior biopsy. ROC curves and Youden's index were used to assess predictive accuracy and determine optimal SUVmax cut-offs. Decision curve analysis (DCA) was used to evaluate net clinical benefit.

Results: Eighty seven patients had an MRI, of which 34 lesions were MRI invisible. MRI-visible lesions had higher detection rates of PCa (83.3%) compared to MRI-invisible lesions (45.7%, p < 0.001). PET-only identified csPCa in 28% of MRI-invisible lesions (SUVmax mean 9.2 ± 1.8), with 32.4% of these patients proceeding to definitive treatment. Among patients with prior biopsies (60), 35.3% were upgraded, including 18.3% with reassuring/equivocal MRI (PI-RADS ≤ 3) findings. Overall, PET-guided biopsy detected PCa in 47.2% of all patients and csPCa in 24.7%. For the entire cohort, SUVmax ≥ 7.6 provided optimal discrimination between benign and csPCa (AUC = 0.73, 95% CI 0.64-0.82) with a clinical net benefit.

Conclusion: PSMA PET-fusion targeting can improve accuracy for PCa detection at SUV ≥ 7.7. PET-targeted biopsy can complement standard biopsy methods, especially in those with MRI-invisible lesions or patients with prior negative biopsies.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Prostate
Prostate 医学-泌尿学与肾脏学
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
3.60%
发文量
180
审稿时长
1.5 months
期刊介绍: The Prostate is a peer-reviewed journal dedicated to original studies of this organ and the male accessory glands. It serves as an international medium for these studies, presenting comprehensive coverage of clinical, anatomic, embryologic, physiologic, endocrinologic, and biochemical studies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信