Basil Kaufmann, Manish Choudhary, Ashutosh Maheshwari, Swati Bhardwaj, Adriana Pedraza, Reuben Ben-David, Asher Mandel, Neeraja Tillu, Vinayak G Wagaskar, Mani Menon, Michael A Gorin, Ashutosh K Tewari
{"title":"微超声对前列腺根治术后局部复发的诊断价值。","authors":"Basil Kaufmann, Manish Choudhary, Ashutosh Maheshwari, Swati Bhardwaj, Adriana Pedraza, Reuben Ben-David, Asher Mandel, Neeraja Tillu, Vinayak G Wagaskar, Mani Menon, Michael A Gorin, Ashutosh K Tewari","doi":"10.1002/pros.70069","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The limited resolution of standard transrectal ultrasound (TRUS) has made it difficult to perform biopsies of the prostate bed in cases of suspected local recurrence following radical prostatectomy. The aim of this study was to benchmark the performance of using high resolution micro-ultrasound (microUS) in place of standard TRUS for performing post-prostatectomy biopsies.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>We conducted a retrospective review of pathology reports from January 2013 to October 2024, identifying patients who underwent biopsies of the prostate bed for suspected local recurrence after radical prostate. Sensitivity and specificity were compared for biopsies performed using standard TRUS. A biopsy was deemed diagnostic if it revealed prostate tissue (cancerous or benign) or non-prostatic tissue when a previously suspicious lesion was no longer detectable on subsequent imaging. The ground truth for local recurrence was defined by biochemical recurrence (prostate-specific antigen [PSA] ≥ 0.2 ng/mL in two consecutive measurements) accompanied by reproducible findings in the prostate bed on MRI and/or PET.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 24 patients included, 10 (42%) underwent microUS-guided biopsy and 14 (58%) underwent TRUS-guided biopsy. The median PSA levels at biopsy for the microUS and TRUS cohorts were 0.39 ng/mL (range 0.39-6.40) and 0.45 ng/mL (range 0.20-30.82), respectively. The median lesion sizes on MRI were 0.9 cm (IQR 0.7-1.8) for microUS and 2.5 cm (IQR 1.2-6) for TRUS. MicroUS demonstrated a sensitivity of 89% (95% CI: 52-100), compared with 43% (95% CI: 18-71) for TRUS. Specificity could not be reliably assessed, as only one recurrence-negative patient was available in the microUS group and none in the TRUS group.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>MicroUS-guided transrectal biopsies appear to offer superior diagnostic performance in detecting local recurrences following radical prostatectomy compared to standard TRUS-guided biopsy. Further study is needed to confirm our findings and to evaluate the performance of microUS-guided biopsies independently of pre-biopsy imaging results.</p>","PeriodicalId":54544,"journal":{"name":"Prostate","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Diagnostic Value of Micro-Ultrasound in Identifying Local Recurrence After Radical Prostatectomy.\",\"authors\":\"Basil Kaufmann, Manish Choudhary, Ashutosh Maheshwari, Swati Bhardwaj, Adriana Pedraza, Reuben Ben-David, Asher Mandel, Neeraja Tillu, Vinayak G Wagaskar, Mani Menon, Michael A Gorin, Ashutosh K Tewari\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/pros.70069\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The limited resolution of standard transrectal ultrasound (TRUS) has made it difficult to perform biopsies of the prostate bed in cases of suspected local recurrence following radical prostatectomy. The aim of this study was to benchmark the performance of using high resolution micro-ultrasound (microUS) in place of standard TRUS for performing post-prostatectomy biopsies.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>We conducted a retrospective review of pathology reports from January 2013 to October 2024, identifying patients who underwent biopsies of the prostate bed for suspected local recurrence after radical prostate. Sensitivity and specificity were compared for biopsies performed using standard TRUS. A biopsy was deemed diagnostic if it revealed prostate tissue (cancerous or benign) or non-prostatic tissue when a previously suspicious lesion was no longer detectable on subsequent imaging. The ground truth for local recurrence was defined by biochemical recurrence (prostate-specific antigen [PSA] ≥ 0.2 ng/mL in two consecutive measurements) accompanied by reproducible findings in the prostate bed on MRI and/or PET.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 24 patients included, 10 (42%) underwent microUS-guided biopsy and 14 (58%) underwent TRUS-guided biopsy. The median PSA levels at biopsy for the microUS and TRUS cohorts were 0.39 ng/mL (range 0.39-6.40) and 0.45 ng/mL (range 0.20-30.82), respectively. The median lesion sizes on MRI were 0.9 cm (IQR 0.7-1.8) for microUS and 2.5 cm (IQR 1.2-6) for TRUS. MicroUS demonstrated a sensitivity of 89% (95% CI: 52-100), compared with 43% (95% CI: 18-71) for TRUS. Specificity could not be reliably assessed, as only one recurrence-negative patient was available in the microUS group and none in the TRUS group.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>MicroUS-guided transrectal biopsies appear to offer superior diagnostic performance in detecting local recurrences following radical prostatectomy compared to standard TRUS-guided biopsy. Further study is needed to confirm our findings and to evaluate the performance of microUS-guided biopsies independently of pre-biopsy imaging results.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54544,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Prostate\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Prostate\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/pros.70069\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Prostate","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/pros.70069","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的:标准经直肠超声(TRUS)的分辨率有限,使得在根治性前列腺切除术后怀疑局部复发的病例中难以进行前列腺床活检。本研究的目的是对使用高分辨率微超声(microUS)代替标准TRUS进行前列腺切除术后活检的性能进行基准测试。材料与方法:我们回顾性分析2013年1月至2024年10月期间的病理报告,筛选出因前列腺根治性术后疑似局部复发而行前列腺床活检的患者。比较使用标准TRUS进行活检的敏感性和特异性。如果活检显示前列腺组织(癌性或良性)或非前列腺组织,而先前可疑的病变在随后的成像中不再检测到,则认为活检是诊断性的。局部复发的基本事实是通过生化复发(前列腺特异性抗原[PSA]在两次连续测量中≥0.2 ng/mL)并伴有MRI和/或PET在前列腺床上的重复性发现来定义的。结果:在纳入的24例患者中,10例(42%)接受了微创引导下的活检,14例(58%)接受了超声引导下的活检。microUS组和TRUS组的活检中位PSA水平分别为0.39 ng/mL(范围0.39-6.40)和0.45 ng/mL(范围0.20-30.82)。MRI中位病灶大小为:microUS为0.9 cm (IQR 0.7-1.8), TRUS为2.5 cm (IQR 1.2-6)。MicroUS的敏感性为89% (95% CI: 52-100),而TRUS的敏感性为43% (95% CI: 18-71)。特异性不能可靠地评估,因为在microUS组中只有1例复发阴性患者,而在TRUS组中没有。结论:在根治性前列腺切除术后,与标准的超声引导活检相比,超声引导下的经直肠活检在检测局部复发方面具有更好的诊断效果。需要进一步的研究来证实我们的发现,并评估独立于活检前成像结果的显微引导活检的性能。
Diagnostic Value of Micro-Ultrasound in Identifying Local Recurrence After Radical Prostatectomy.
Purpose: The limited resolution of standard transrectal ultrasound (TRUS) has made it difficult to perform biopsies of the prostate bed in cases of suspected local recurrence following radical prostatectomy. The aim of this study was to benchmark the performance of using high resolution micro-ultrasound (microUS) in place of standard TRUS for performing post-prostatectomy biopsies.
Materials and methods: We conducted a retrospective review of pathology reports from January 2013 to October 2024, identifying patients who underwent biopsies of the prostate bed for suspected local recurrence after radical prostate. Sensitivity and specificity were compared for biopsies performed using standard TRUS. A biopsy was deemed diagnostic if it revealed prostate tissue (cancerous or benign) or non-prostatic tissue when a previously suspicious lesion was no longer detectable on subsequent imaging. The ground truth for local recurrence was defined by biochemical recurrence (prostate-specific antigen [PSA] ≥ 0.2 ng/mL in two consecutive measurements) accompanied by reproducible findings in the prostate bed on MRI and/or PET.
Results: Of the 24 patients included, 10 (42%) underwent microUS-guided biopsy and 14 (58%) underwent TRUS-guided biopsy. The median PSA levels at biopsy for the microUS and TRUS cohorts were 0.39 ng/mL (range 0.39-6.40) and 0.45 ng/mL (range 0.20-30.82), respectively. The median lesion sizes on MRI were 0.9 cm (IQR 0.7-1.8) for microUS and 2.5 cm (IQR 1.2-6) for TRUS. MicroUS demonstrated a sensitivity of 89% (95% CI: 52-100), compared with 43% (95% CI: 18-71) for TRUS. Specificity could not be reliably assessed, as only one recurrence-negative patient was available in the microUS group and none in the TRUS group.
Conclusion: MicroUS-guided transrectal biopsies appear to offer superior diagnostic performance in detecting local recurrences following radical prostatectomy compared to standard TRUS-guided biopsy. Further study is needed to confirm our findings and to evaluate the performance of microUS-guided biopsies independently of pre-biopsy imaging results.
期刊介绍:
The Prostate is a peer-reviewed journal dedicated to original studies of this organ and the male accessory glands. It serves as an international medium for these studies, presenting comprehensive coverage of clinical, anatomic, embryologic, physiologic, endocrinologic, and biochemical studies.