考虑肿瘤控制和毒性的低剂量率近距离放射治疗前列腺癌的局部剂量评估。

IF 2.5 3区 医学 Q3 ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM
Prostate Pub Date : 2025-10-06 DOI:10.1002/pros.70039
Yasushi Nakai, Kenta Onishi, Isao Asakawa, Makito Miyake, Kaori Yamaki, Fumiaki Isohashi, Akihiko Yoshizawa, Kiyohide Fujimoto, Nobumichi Tanaka
{"title":"考虑肿瘤控制和毒性的低剂量率近距离放射治疗前列腺癌的局部剂量评估。","authors":"Yasushi Nakai, Kenta Onishi, Isao Asakawa, Makito Miyake, Kaori Yamaki, Fumiaki Isohashi, Akihiko Yoshizawa, Kiyohide Fujimoto, Nobumichi Tanaka","doi":"10.1002/pros.70039","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>This study evaluated factors associated with clinical failure and toxicity in patients with low-, intermediate-, and high-risk prostate cancer treated with low-dose-rate brachytherapy (LDR-BT) alone or combined with external beam radiation therapy (EBRT).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Seven hundred thirteen patients (low risk: n = 323; intermediate-risk: n = 390) underwent LDR-BT alone, whereas 534 patients (intermediate-risk: n = 225; high risk: n = 309) underwent LDR-BT combined with EBRT. The Fine-Gray hazard model was used to identify factors associated with clinical failure, and the Youden index was employed to determine BED cut-off values for Grade 3 or higher toxicity.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In patients treated with LDR-BT alone, BED thresholds of ≥ 180 Gy2 (low-risk; hazard ratio [HR]: 0.38; 95% confidence interval [95% CI], 0.15-0.98, intermediate-risk; HR: 0.29; 95% CI, 0.12-0.70) was significantly associated with better clinical outcomes. Patients with Grade 3 or higher toxicity had significantly higher BEDs than those without toxicity (p = 0.008). A BED threshold of 200 Gy2 was identified as a cut-off value for toxicity risk. In patients treated with LDR-BT combined with EBRT, BED was not significantly associated with improved clinical failure-free rates. Patients experiencing Grade 3 or higher toxicity exhibited significantly higher BEDs than those without toxicity (p = 0.04). A BED cut-off of 220 Gy2 was determined for toxicity.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>For patients undergoing LDR-BT alone, a BED of 180-200 Gy2 is optimal. For patients undergoing LDR-BT combined with EBRT, a BED of 200-220 Gy2 may be more appropriate.</p>","PeriodicalId":54544,"journal":{"name":"Prostate","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluating Local Doses for Prostate Cancer Treatment Using Low-Dose-Rate Brachytherapy Considering Oncological Control and Toxicity.\",\"authors\":\"Yasushi Nakai, Kenta Onishi, Isao Asakawa, Makito Miyake, Kaori Yamaki, Fumiaki Isohashi, Akihiko Yoshizawa, Kiyohide Fujimoto, Nobumichi Tanaka\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/pros.70039\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>This study evaluated factors associated with clinical failure and toxicity in patients with low-, intermediate-, and high-risk prostate cancer treated with low-dose-rate brachytherapy (LDR-BT) alone or combined with external beam radiation therapy (EBRT).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Seven hundred thirteen patients (low risk: n = 323; intermediate-risk: n = 390) underwent LDR-BT alone, whereas 534 patients (intermediate-risk: n = 225; high risk: n = 309) underwent LDR-BT combined with EBRT. The Fine-Gray hazard model was used to identify factors associated with clinical failure, and the Youden index was employed to determine BED cut-off values for Grade 3 or higher toxicity.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In patients treated with LDR-BT alone, BED thresholds of ≥ 180 Gy2 (low-risk; hazard ratio [HR]: 0.38; 95% confidence interval [95% CI], 0.15-0.98, intermediate-risk; HR: 0.29; 95% CI, 0.12-0.70) was significantly associated with better clinical outcomes. Patients with Grade 3 or higher toxicity had significantly higher BEDs than those without toxicity (p = 0.008). A BED threshold of 200 Gy2 was identified as a cut-off value for toxicity risk. In patients treated with LDR-BT combined with EBRT, BED was not significantly associated with improved clinical failure-free rates. Patients experiencing Grade 3 or higher toxicity exhibited significantly higher BEDs than those without toxicity (p = 0.04). A BED cut-off of 220 Gy2 was determined for toxicity.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>For patients undergoing LDR-BT alone, a BED of 180-200 Gy2 is optimal. For patients undergoing LDR-BT combined with EBRT, a BED of 200-220 Gy2 may be more appropriate.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54544,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Prostate\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Prostate\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/pros.70039\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Prostate","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/pros.70039","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:本研究评估了低剂量率近距离放疗(LDR-BT)单独或联合外束放射治疗(EBRT)治疗低、中、高风险前列腺癌患者临床失败和毒性的相关因素。方法:713例患者(低风险:n = 323,中风险:n = 390)单独接受LDR-BT治疗,534例患者(中风险:n = 225,高风险:n = 309)接受LDR-BT联合EBRT治疗。采用Fine-Gray风险模型来确定与临床失败相关的因素,并采用约登指数来确定3级或更高毒性的BED临界值。结果:在单独接受LDR-BT治疗的患者中,BED阈值≥180 Gy2(低风险;危险比[HR]: 0.38; 95%可信区间[95% CI]: 0.15-0.98,中风险;HR: 0.29; 95% CI: 0.12-0.70)与较好的临床结果显著相关。3级及以上毒性患者的床位数明显高于无毒性患者(p = 0.008)。200 Gy2的BED阈值被确定为毒性风险的临界值。在LDR-BT联合EBRT治疗的患者中,BED与临床无失败率的提高没有显著相关。3级或以上毒性患者的床位数明显高于无毒性患者(p = 0.04)。毒性测定的BED截止值为220 Gy2。结论:对于单独接受LDR-BT的患者,180- 200gy2的BED是最佳的。对于接受LDR-BT联合EBRT的患者,200- 220gy2的BED可能更合适。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Evaluating Local Doses for Prostate Cancer Treatment Using Low-Dose-Rate Brachytherapy Considering Oncological Control and Toxicity.

Background: This study evaluated factors associated with clinical failure and toxicity in patients with low-, intermediate-, and high-risk prostate cancer treated with low-dose-rate brachytherapy (LDR-BT) alone or combined with external beam radiation therapy (EBRT).

Methods: Seven hundred thirteen patients (low risk: n = 323; intermediate-risk: n = 390) underwent LDR-BT alone, whereas 534 patients (intermediate-risk: n = 225; high risk: n = 309) underwent LDR-BT combined with EBRT. The Fine-Gray hazard model was used to identify factors associated with clinical failure, and the Youden index was employed to determine BED cut-off values for Grade 3 or higher toxicity.

Results: In patients treated with LDR-BT alone, BED thresholds of ≥ 180 Gy2 (low-risk; hazard ratio [HR]: 0.38; 95% confidence interval [95% CI], 0.15-0.98, intermediate-risk; HR: 0.29; 95% CI, 0.12-0.70) was significantly associated with better clinical outcomes. Patients with Grade 3 or higher toxicity had significantly higher BEDs than those without toxicity (p = 0.008). A BED threshold of 200 Gy2 was identified as a cut-off value for toxicity risk. In patients treated with LDR-BT combined with EBRT, BED was not significantly associated with improved clinical failure-free rates. Patients experiencing Grade 3 or higher toxicity exhibited significantly higher BEDs than those without toxicity (p = 0.04). A BED cut-off of 220 Gy2 was determined for toxicity.

Conclusion: For patients undergoing LDR-BT alone, a BED of 180-200 Gy2 is optimal. For patients undergoing LDR-BT combined with EBRT, a BED of 200-220 Gy2 may be more appropriate.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Prostate
Prostate 医学-泌尿学与肾脏学
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
3.60%
发文量
180
审稿时长
1.5 months
期刊介绍: The Prostate is a peer-reviewed journal dedicated to original studies of this organ and the male accessory glands. It serves as an international medium for these studies, presenting comprehensive coverage of clinical, anatomic, embryologic, physiologic, endocrinologic, and biochemical studies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信