基于区域的剥夺指数和医疗保健相关感染:证据的叙述性回顾。

IF 2.9 4区 医学 Q2 INFECTIOUS DISEASES
Current Infectious Disease Reports Pub Date : 2025-01-01 Epub Date: 2025-10-03 DOI:10.1007/s11908-025-00869-9
Jacinda C Abdul-Mutakabbir
{"title":"基于区域的剥夺指数和医疗保健相关感染:证据的叙述性回顾。","authors":"Jacinda C Abdul-Mutakabbir","doi":"10.1007/s11908-025-00869-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose of review: </strong>Since the coronavirus disease-19 (COVID-19) pandemic started, there has been a rise in published studies using area-based deprivation indices to explore the link between neighborhood-level social determinants of health (SDoH) and susceptibility to infectious diseases. However, questions remain about how these deprivation indices were developed and how effective they are at identifying and addressing healthcare-associated infection (HAI) disparities. This review aims to clarify the origins of the most commonly used deprivation indices in HAI epidemiology research and to offer key considerations and recommendations for their use to enhance prevention strategies and advocacy efforts.</p><p><strong>Recent findings: </strong>The two most frequently used area-based deprivation indices in HAI epidemiology research are the area deprivation index and the social vulnerability index. Of interest, both indices use data from the American Community Survey disseminated by the US Census Bureau to describe area-level socioeconomic and material deprivation across various geographic areas nationwide. Researchers have combined these area-based indices with clinical and individual-level sociodemographic variables and found that higher levels of disadvantage correlate with an increased occurrence of HAIs. Despite similarities in findings when using these indices, they have distinct differences that should be considered.</p><p><strong>Summary: </strong>Area-level deprivation can increase an individual's risk of HAIs, and deprivation indices are tools that can quantify this relationship. Despite the availability of relevant data, there is a need to expand the existing literature using deprivation indices in HAI research. Ultimately, this exploratory research has the potential to inform prevention strategies and policy reforms aimed at reducing disparities in HAIs.</p>","PeriodicalId":48839,"journal":{"name":"Current Infectious Disease Reports","volume":"27 1","pages":"20"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12494663/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Area-based Deprivation Indices and Healthcare-Associated Infections: A Narrative Review of Evidence.\",\"authors\":\"Jacinda C Abdul-Mutakabbir\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s11908-025-00869-9\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose of review: </strong>Since the coronavirus disease-19 (COVID-19) pandemic started, there has been a rise in published studies using area-based deprivation indices to explore the link between neighborhood-level social determinants of health (SDoH) and susceptibility to infectious diseases. However, questions remain about how these deprivation indices were developed and how effective they are at identifying and addressing healthcare-associated infection (HAI) disparities. This review aims to clarify the origins of the most commonly used deprivation indices in HAI epidemiology research and to offer key considerations and recommendations for their use to enhance prevention strategies and advocacy efforts.</p><p><strong>Recent findings: </strong>The two most frequently used area-based deprivation indices in HAI epidemiology research are the area deprivation index and the social vulnerability index. Of interest, both indices use data from the American Community Survey disseminated by the US Census Bureau to describe area-level socioeconomic and material deprivation across various geographic areas nationwide. Researchers have combined these area-based indices with clinical and individual-level sociodemographic variables and found that higher levels of disadvantage correlate with an increased occurrence of HAIs. Despite similarities in findings when using these indices, they have distinct differences that should be considered.</p><p><strong>Summary: </strong>Area-level deprivation can increase an individual's risk of HAIs, and deprivation indices are tools that can quantify this relationship. Despite the availability of relevant data, there is a need to expand the existing literature using deprivation indices in HAI research. Ultimately, this exploratory research has the potential to inform prevention strategies and policy reforms aimed at reducing disparities in HAIs.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48839,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Current Infectious Disease Reports\",\"volume\":\"27 1\",\"pages\":\"20\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12494663/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Current Infectious Disease Reports\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11908-025-00869-9\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/10/3 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"INFECTIOUS DISEASES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Infectious Disease Reports","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11908-025-00869-9","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/10/3 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

综述目的:自2019冠状病毒病(COVID-19)大流行开始以来,利用基于区域的剥夺指数(area-based deprivation indices)探讨社区层面健康社会决定因素(social determinants of health, SDoH)与传染病易感性之间的联系的已发表研究有所增加。然而,这些剥夺指数是如何制定的,以及它们在识别和解决卫生保健相关感染(HAI)差异方面的效果如何,这些问题仍然存在。本综述旨在澄清HAI流行病学研究中最常用的剥夺指数的起源,并为使用剥夺指数以加强预防战略和宣传工作提供关键考虑和建议。最新发现:在HAI流行病学研究中,最常用的两个基于区域的剥夺指数是区域剥夺指数和社会脆弱性指数。有趣的是,这两个指数都使用了美国人口普查局发布的美国社区调查数据,来描述全国不同地理区域的区域级社会经济和物质匮乏情况。研究人员将这些以地区为基础的指数与临床和个人水平的社会人口变量结合起来,发现较高水平的不利条件与HAIs的发生率增加相关。尽管在使用这些指数时发现相似之处,但它们有明显的差异,应予以考虑。摘要:区域层面的剥夺会增加个人患艾滋病的风险,而剥夺指数是量化这种关系的工具。尽管有相关数据,但仍需要扩大现有文献中使用剥夺指数在HAI研究中的应用。最终,这项探索性研究有可能为旨在减少卫生保健服务差距的预防战略和政策改革提供信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Area-based Deprivation Indices and Healthcare-Associated Infections: A Narrative Review of Evidence.

Purpose of review: Since the coronavirus disease-19 (COVID-19) pandemic started, there has been a rise in published studies using area-based deprivation indices to explore the link between neighborhood-level social determinants of health (SDoH) and susceptibility to infectious diseases. However, questions remain about how these deprivation indices were developed and how effective they are at identifying and addressing healthcare-associated infection (HAI) disparities. This review aims to clarify the origins of the most commonly used deprivation indices in HAI epidemiology research and to offer key considerations and recommendations for their use to enhance prevention strategies and advocacy efforts.

Recent findings: The two most frequently used area-based deprivation indices in HAI epidemiology research are the area deprivation index and the social vulnerability index. Of interest, both indices use data from the American Community Survey disseminated by the US Census Bureau to describe area-level socioeconomic and material deprivation across various geographic areas nationwide. Researchers have combined these area-based indices with clinical and individual-level sociodemographic variables and found that higher levels of disadvantage correlate with an increased occurrence of HAIs. Despite similarities in findings when using these indices, they have distinct differences that should be considered.

Summary: Area-level deprivation can increase an individual's risk of HAIs, and deprivation indices are tools that can quantify this relationship. Despite the availability of relevant data, there is a need to expand the existing literature using deprivation indices in HAI research. Ultimately, this exploratory research has the potential to inform prevention strategies and policy reforms aimed at reducing disparities in HAIs.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Current Infectious Disease Reports
Current Infectious Disease Reports INFECTIOUS DISEASES-
CiteScore
6.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
19
期刊介绍: This journal intends to provide clear, insightful, balanced contributions by international experts that review the most important, recently published clinical findings related to the diagnosis, treatment, management, and prevention of infectious disease. We accomplish this aim by appointing international authorities to serve as Section Editors in key subject areas, such as HIV/AIDS, sexually transmitted diseases, tropical and travel medicine, and urinary tract infections. Section Editors, in turn, select topics for which leading experts contribute comprehensive review articles that emphasize new developments and recently published papers of major importance, highlighted by annotated reference lists.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信